Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Retired Liberal SCOTUS Justice Makes In-Kind Contribution to NRA (Stevens)
Quote | Reply
WaPo basically saying retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens just gave a huge gift to the NRA, the GOP and pro-2A advocates by calling for the 2nd Amendment to be repealed (yeah, good luck with making that happen anytime soon). The paper calls Stevens' NY Times editorial "unhelpful." Well, to Democrats, anyway:

"One of the biggest threats to the recovery of the Democratic Party these days is overreach. Having seen what Republicans have accomplished while pushing to the right, Democrats are debating how hard to push in the opposite direction — on the minimum wage, on abortion, on health care and on education. A party that was once afraid of being tagged with supporting “government-run” health care is increasingly okay with the word “liberal” and even voted in droves for a self-described socialist in 2016. And its 2020 hopefuls are leading the leftward charge.

But rarely do we see such an unhelpful and fanciful idea as the one put forward by liberal former Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens.

In a New York Times op-ed on Tuesday, Stevens calls for a repeal of the Second Amendment. The move might as well be considered an in-kind contribution to the National Rifle Association, to Republicans’ efforts to keep the House and Senate in 2018, and to President Trump’s 2020 reelection bid. In one fell swoop, Stevens has lent credence to the talking point that the left really just wants to get rid of gun ownership and reasserted the need for gun-rights supporters to prevent his ilk from ever being appointed again (with the most obvious answer being: Vote Republican)."

Law and Crime’s Matt Naham also calls Stevens’ argument, and the New York Times’ decision to publish it, “irresponsible." But gun-grabbers gotta try to grab guns, amirite or amirite? ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: Retired Liberal SCOTUS Justice Makes In-Kind Contribution to NRA (Stevens) [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ya know, not even 24 months ago - November 2016 to be exact - the left was shitting their fucking pants because Trump won. They were crying about tyranny, oppression of the LGBT community and just about any other minority group out there.

Now, they are screaming that they want (eventually all) guns banned. Heck - let's go all in and call for a repeal of the 2A.

I guess marijuana does cause short term memory loss.



"Du or Du not-there is no Tri" - Yoda
Last edited by: timberwolf: Mar 27, 18 19:09
Quote Reply
Re: Retired Liberal SCOTUS Justice Makes In-Kind Contribution to NRA (Stevens) [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
 Might not be easy to amend the constitution, but it would be very easy to overturn the 2008 Heller vs DC. Overturn Heller and you have essentially gutted the Second Amendment.

Ginsburg longs for the day that she has the opportunity to "revisit" Heller. Stevens has already opened the door with his dissent in Heller, which has been described as providing a backdoor to overturn Heller.

https://www.nytimes.com/...ues-latest-term.html


"She mulled whether the court could revisit its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which effectively struck down a key part of the Voting Rights Act. She said she did not see how that could be done.
The court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, establishing an individual right to own guns, may be another matter, she said.
“I thought Heller was “a very bad decision,” she said, adding that a chance to reconsider it could arise whenever the court considers a challenge to a gun control law."
Last edited by: DJFaithful: Mar 27, 18 21:27
Quote Reply