For quite a while I didn't eat great. Pretty much what I wanted. It must have been barely less than my riding output, as the weight slowly but surely went down.
Now, I've tried to eat better. Fewer trips to the local greasy taco joint for lunch, no Wendy's for lunch, not downing 4 beers a couple times a week, etc... Instead salads, leftovers, a little red wine here/there, better choices. Still a splurge when appropriate.
However, as the power has gone up and the weight gone down, some of the workouts seem to really deplete me now.
I started doing 2x20 workouts to prep for TT racing. It's creating a deficit.
It's convenient for me to do these workouts at a time before lunch time. I could maybe eat a bigger breakfast.
But, is it ever a consideration for "convenience" nutrition for harder workouts? I'm talking taking a gel for a 60-90min workout. I'm starting to get close to 900 calories in an hour on the bike for some of these workouts. I know there's people here doing much more than that for longer. It's just that this is what I'm experiencing now.
I don't want to increase my overall diet necessarily to cover that just to have to cut it out again. I don't want to "yo-yo" eat to cover this stuff. I'm just a lowly am-bike racer guy.
It seems I could take one SiS at almost 400KJ for one of those workouts.
When eating a little better, 900 calories isn't a trivial amount to make up for.
I admit ignorance on this one. I've read some things violently opposing alternative nutrition for anything under 60 to 90 minutes and advocating whole foods, etc. I'm just not used to having to replace that much energy this often. People eat heavy before 1/2 marathons or something, I feel I'm going to have to for workouts on the bike.
Thanks.
Now, I've tried to eat better. Fewer trips to the local greasy taco joint for lunch, no Wendy's for lunch, not downing 4 beers a couple times a week, etc... Instead salads, leftovers, a little red wine here/there, better choices. Still a splurge when appropriate.
However, as the power has gone up and the weight gone down, some of the workouts seem to really deplete me now.
I started doing 2x20 workouts to prep for TT racing. It's creating a deficit.
It's convenient for me to do these workouts at a time before lunch time. I could maybe eat a bigger breakfast.
But, is it ever a consideration for "convenience" nutrition for harder workouts? I'm talking taking a gel for a 60-90min workout. I'm starting to get close to 900 calories in an hour on the bike for some of these workouts. I know there's people here doing much more than that for longer. It's just that this is what I'm experiencing now.
I don't want to increase my overall diet necessarily to cover that just to have to cut it out again. I don't want to "yo-yo" eat to cover this stuff. I'm just a lowly am-bike racer guy.
It seems I could take one SiS at almost 400KJ for one of those workouts.
When eating a little better, 900 calories isn't a trivial amount to make up for.
I admit ignorance on this one. I've read some things violently opposing alternative nutrition for anything under 60 to 90 minutes and advocating whole foods, etc. I'm just not used to having to replace that much energy this often. People eat heavy before 1/2 marathons or something, I feel I'm going to have to for workouts on the bike.
Thanks.