Haven't used a new optical arm strap (seriously considering pre-ordering the Scosche 24). However, I have noticed that indoors, on the trainer, steady state, reasonably tight watch HR monitor is actually quite accurate (checked against palpation) within a few beats. Also resting HR when you wake up reasonably accurate. HR sitting at a desk reasonably accurate. However outdoors in the sunlight, or any increases in HR such as intervals or even a teeny tiny hill and the wrist monitor is pure garbage. I mean it's almost as bad as nothing at all. Chest straps are still considered the gold standard but sometimes need a bit of help from a dollop of electrode gel especially if you're like me and own a bunch of cheap stuff. I've had plenty of odd spikes at the start of a workout before I started using electrode gel. If you live in a dry area or are in a drought it might prove to be hard to get a good reading. Basically what I'm trying to get at is the right tool for the right job. Eventually I'll stop being a cheap skate and use all 3 types of monitors. Wrist based is great for steady state on the trainer or the ability to check you resting HR throughout the week and know when to take a day off. The chest strap would be best for cycling (especially if you have a bunch of long rides in a row), or as a back up when you don't charge your arm based HR monitor, plus all in all is still king of accuracy. You arm band is great or running and everyday use.
I still lapped everyone on the couch!
I still lapped everyone on the couch!