shady wrote:
NormM wrote:
Yeah, I just heard that yesterday. My daughter was involved in gymnastics going back more than 20 years ago. We are in MI and occasionally would go to Twistars for meets and she attended a camp once where he was coaching. Even as a kid she remembers in a tough sport with tough coaches how nasty he was and she had a visceral dislike for him.
Tottally off topic...but as a parent of a 10yrold super athletic daughter my wife and I are so glad she never once showed any interest in gymnastics. ANy sport that requires going ALL IN before puberty freaks me out
A few thoughts on this— I really agree with your sense of caution or reluctance to have a kid go all in on a sport before puberty. It seems like it would create a dependence on the sport and an identification with the sport that can make a developing person really vulnerable.
I’m sure there are ways to do an “all in” approach right, but it would take some very careful thinking and a ton of involvement from the parents. I have a friend who is a world class swimmer whose daughter is now pretty much a world class swimmer, and I think it worked well because swimming was so integrated into their life that they swam and took breaks from swimming like you would read a book and then put it down for a while. Of course you read. Of course you swim. It’s enjoyable and we do it.
I think it’s really important to think about the grooming by abusive coaches as a manipulation of both kids and parents. The kids are victims, and the parents are victims too. The coaches weaken parental authority, like by prohibiting parents at practices and engaging in masked abusive behavior in front of parents in order to give the appearance or make it seem like the parents consent or ratify the abusive behavior. When an unknowing parent is in the room during abuse, that’s really devious. Requiring a kid to be “all in” seems like another form of manipulation. It’s asking too much.