Well according to Dan's analysis I was a "climber" Got into the sport in 1981. Competed in the shorter events for a number of years, but always seemed to do better as the race got longer. Knew somehow that Ironman was going to be a point of destiny for me. Did my first IM in '89(IMH) then did 8 more IM races in the next 8 years. I kept going because I was doing better and better - driven along by my own personal performance. Packed it in in 1997 after a solid effort at IMC and decided that with a 1 month old child and a new job it was time to walk away from it for the time being - and I did. That was the last time that I swam hard and the last time that I road over three hours. I still stayed fit and although I have had some semi serious back-problems to deal with, I stay active( cycled 60K easy last Saturday with a good friend).
I had considered jumping back into the sport seriously when I turned 40( 2001) a few years ago as the competition in the masters division both locally and at the national level in Canada was not that deep - I was one of the first wave of top people in the country from the early days to reach 40 - but the back problems and some other personal issues put that on hold.
If the back problems ever sort themselves out I am still thinking of getting back into it, but if that never happens - I am fine with that. It was a great run, and I feel lucky to have been able to experience the sport in my country from the very early days. It came full circle for me when Simon Whitfield, A Canadian Kid from Ontario, won the Gold Medal in Sydney. A few months later when I bumped into him at a running race he actually thanked me for helping get the sport off the ground locally in Ontario. I really did nothing, but I was touched by his thoughts none-the-less!
Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog