Liaman wrote:
spot wrote:
Liaman wrote:
Hold on,
You were saying that you thought that these integrated front ends were "fugly" just a few days ago on the Giant Trinity thread:
spot wrote:
TrekGeek wrote:
Liaman wrote:
A lot of people find them ugly though.
Absolutely ugly!
Agreed, fugly.
Spot
Are you stalking me? I didn't say the integrated front of the giant looked fugly, I was commenting on the overall look of the bike. Just doesn't do it for me. The Canyon looks much better to my eyes. Is that ok with you?
Spot
Not stalking, no.
Your fugly comment was a reply to a point I made on that thread, a point about how I like the integrated front end hydration trend that we are starting to see (I gave the the Canyon as an example) but that I realise that some people find this trend ugly. That's why I remembered it.
My original comment:
"I think that this style of integrated front end hydration and bento will become the new norm.
You only need to look at the new Canyon, new Cube, and now this Giant to see the trend forming.
Personally I like the look and utility of them, and so am happy with the way things are going. A lot of people find them ugly though." You're obviously entitled to whatever opinion you want re: bikes or basically anything else, I just found it weird that you were talking about how nice the front end looked just a day or two after proclaiming them fugly.
Didn't see your original comment, and for the last time, I wasn't commenting on just the front end. Not sure why you keep bringing that up. To me the Giant is just a weird combination of integrated front end with a P3-like curved rear, while the Canyon just seems more put together as a whole.
___________________________________________________
Taco cat spelled backwards is....taco cat.