Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [jimatbeyond] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Stay away from these clowns at the range 😜
In the foreground pic was cropped there is another rifle not pointed down range


Quote Reply
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That looks like the Range Master, which makes it a double WTF?

"...the street finds its own uses for things"
Quote Reply
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [patf] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Long live the SBR , the ATF rule is dead.
Quote Reply
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The ATF will appeal this ruling to the 5th Circuit Court and they will rule in favor of the plaintiffs.

The ATF will then appeal to the Supreme Court and they will rule in favor of the plaintiffs.

All of the ATF's interpretations of laws are about to come tumbling down. Bumpstocks will not be machineguns. Forced reset triggers will not be machineguns. 80% frames and receivers will not be firearms.
Last edited by: jimatbeyond: Nov 9, 23 14:54
Quote Reply
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ATF just got kicked in the teeth again. Their partial frames and receivers rule just lost in the VanDerStok v. Garland case.
Quote Reply
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The Supreme Court will be holding a conference tomorrow to decide if the VanDerStok case should be granted certiorari.

It only takes four votes to get it on to its next step.

I can easily see the court making a decision in the Cargill case and then doing a GVR on VanDerStok.
Quote Reply

Prev Next