csb wrote:
slowguy wrote:
kiki wrote:
slowguy wrote:
kiki wrote:
slowguy wrote:
Car design may be sexist.
FIFY
Still bullshit, either way you phrase it.
you posted the original bullshit about cars being sexist.
so what's actually bs -- the study? the conclusions?
My post was really obviously a joke.
Different outcomes do not necessarily mean an “ism” is in play. It’s entirely possible that the study is correct, and women are more likely to be injured or die in car crashes, and that there is also not actually sexism involved.
My suspicion is that what’s at play are laziness and cheapness.
Not directed just at you ...
I'm sure the jokes write themselves, but this is one more example of how men and male physiology are the default for "humans," and women are at best considered secondarily. Is it intentional? Doubtful -- I think you're right that it's laziness and cheapness. But by defaulting design to the average male ... to me, this is just one more thing. And I'm just so tired of it.
I wish there was a name for this cheapness and laziness that is so pervasive and detrimental for women.
Maybe someday we’ll invent a word.