SDG wrote:
Nutella wrote:
SDG wrote:
Nutella wrote:
SDG wrote:
TimeIsUp wrote:
Desantis didn’t get that memo. I haven’t looked it up, but makes me think the SC didn’t really say that, otherwise how could this new FL take precedence? I hate agreeing with this bozo, but he’s right about this. https://www.cnn.com/...e-florida/index.html
That is a good law.
Like many of DeSantis' stunts this is clearly un-Constitutional.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Why do you want to intimidate, scare and bully people in their personal space?
Huh? There are already laws against that. This law limits the right of protest in public space. Like so many of DeSantis stunts it is un-Constitutional. He will burn tax payer funds to pass the performative bill, defend it in court, only to lose like he has so many times already.
nope, don't go into the neighborhood and cause a disturbance. period. Due it at their office or place of work, OR you get things like this:
The school board member, Jennifer D. Jenkins, wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post that the protesters heckled her kids, coughed in her face while shouting, "Give her Covid," and burned an obscenity into her lawn with weed killer.
You seem to be under the impression court rulings can't change and this could be found unconstitutional. As we are seeing with Roe, things change over time and Court's interpretations of the constitution and statues due as well. I suggest Desantis is spending the states money wisely in this situation.
While I might agree with your sentiment - that isn't what we have interpreted the 1st amendment to say for almost 240 years. Of course that could change tomorrow.
Protests don't have to be polite or convenient. All (or nearly all) of the things you listed above are not protected speech though. And law enforcement could have stopped.
I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.