Quote:
1.) The Dems are now much more openly supportive of free trade than ever before.
2.) The Dems are now much more openly supportive of immigration than ever before.
3.) The tax cut. The final rates don't bring in enough, but the long term efficiency changes were worth it IMO.
Umm, not agreeing with either of the first two items. The Dems have long been split between the moderate wing ("Clintonian New Dems") and the liberal wing ("Bernie"). There has always been a battle between protectionism and free trade in the Dem party (see Gephardt). Since Clinton and up through Obama, the free trade faction has been much stronger (with small concerns about labor practices and other aspects). The Dems have also ranged immigration, with the left far more adamant about open borders, and moderates looking for a more comprehensive plan of sticter border controls and a path to citizenship. Obama's deportation policies was roundly criticized by the far left, while being accepted by the middle as a quixotic (and failed) attempt to find a single Republican who could back comprehensive reform. Eventually DACA was approved as an EO. The more pragmatic path forward for Dems will be to admit that no Republican will ever support comprehensive immigration reform, and just go it alone with multiple smaller steps.
The Tax cut. Reforming and reducing the marginal corporate rate was a good idea, but the entire implementation was a fail on so many other fronts, most especially with the deficit and expanded spending and double taxation and temporary tax cuts and .... (IMHO).