joshatsilca wrote:
Marginal Gains Podcast Episode 4 just went live:
The sort of "crank asymmetry" talked about at the start of the podcast used to be common. In the days of adjustable square-taper bottom brackets, the spindle was just one piece of the bottom bracket assembly, and it was easy for the market to support a variety of interesting dimensions. Lots of bikes came with asymmetric spindles.
I suspect the main reason for this practice was to minimize q-factor. If both crank arms are as close to the bike as can safely be afforded, the drive-side stuff usually needs to be farther outboard than the non-drive side.
On my '79 Fuji America, the spindle is about a centimeter (!) longer on the drive side, and the difference in actual pedal position relative to bike centerline is similar. Overall q-factor is about 142mm, which isn't too shabby for a triple! Similar to what was said in the podcast, I never noticed the asymmetry until I took the BB apart for service and looked at the spindle.
edit:
I won't take a photo of the America's spindle because it's currently inside of the bicycle, but here's a less extreme example. One side is about 3mm longer than the other: