Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot?
Quote | Reply
The past few days there's been Dan's article and thread about highly cushioned shoes along with a poll that's showing (currently) a plurality of people preferring highly cushioned shoes: 44% high, 34% average, 22% more road feel.

I started running around the time minimalist and low drop shoes started becoming popular and I was one of the people who laughed the first time I saw HOKAs. I thought they looked stupid and the idea of maximalist cushioning sounded anathema to the idea that shoes should emphasize the "foot's connection to the ground" as Dan put it. Nearly all my training and racing shoes have been low drop and pretty minimal cushioning (lots and lots of Inov8s, some Scott RCs, old Nike Free 3.0, etc.). The first shoe I ran in that I'd call cushy was the Saucony ISO Freedom. Then this past season I mostly trained/raced in Skechers Razor 3s, which I think are the most cushioned shoe I've ever had with 22mm of hyerburst in the forefoot.

I like the Razor 3 so I recently tried the GoRun Ride Hyper 8 (27mm forefoot, 33mm heel) but returned them because they felt different than what I'm used to. Taller, less flexible, less road feel.

Admittedly I've probably been biased against cushioned shoes, thinking (mistakenly) lots of cushion was like cheating and a way to mask poor form. But with great runners setting course records in these high cushion, higher drop shoes it looks like I'm probably being a stuborn idiot.

Has anyone gone from more minimal shoes to HOKAs (or similar) and disliked the extra cushioning? Anything to be cautious of with more cushion, maybe like "good for the knees but bad for the ankles"? Do people find they are more likely to heel strike or get sloppy just cause they can?

If some of these highly cushioned shoes means I can put in more and more miles with less wear on the body then I'll probably be a convert.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Anything to be cautious of with more cushion, maybe like "good for the knees but bad for the ankles"? //

When I went from regular shoes to Hokas, I had one major problem. I became confused of what my weekly mileage should look like, as it was 0 for so long, my memory of running 3 to 5 days a week was quite a shock.


But really, just go for it, the old days when you got to be surrounded by friends who thought like you, and you all could rag on anyone wearing the clown shoes, has long passed. In its wake are the few old curmudgeons who are still hanging onto the clown shoe theme, while the give more than they should to their local PT...And when you do test them, forget about speed, and just focus on how your legs feel after a really hard session, or a few hard days. Try and remember what they used to feel like, and do an honest comparison between the two.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I went from running in Nike Frees to now running in saucony kinvara, saucony freedom ISO, Nike epic react, and nike zoom fly.

You’ll feel funny wearing them to begin with, but you’ll get over it after a few runs.

My favorite of the group are the saucony freedom followed by the Zoom Fly. I get that “sloppy” feeling you describe in the epic react. The saucony kinvara just feel a bit “dull” to me.

I still like the nike free for wearing to work and around, but I’ve come to do most of my runs in more a moderate to higher cushioned shoe.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I purchased a couple of pairs of Hokas a couple of years ago but haven't worn them regularly because I haven't had injury/pain issues wearing my Nike Pegasus. I do most of my running on grass or dirt.

Are there any year-long or more studies showing that runners wearing highly cushioned shoes have reduced injury rates and/or are able to run more miles? If so, please provide links if possible. Thanks!
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I spent a number of years in different levels of ‘minimal’ shoes (as thin as the Vibram Five Fingers and Altria Sampson) and nothing over 20mm. I decided give Hokas (Bondi 6) a try after hearing so many many people rave about them. I wasn’t a big fan of them and after a month of doing half my miles in them (just too soft) I developed really bad Achilles tendinitis and had to take 3 months off to let it heal. Maybe it was just a coincidence, but I got rid of them and don’t plan on ever trying Hokas again.

That said I do like the 4% for fast runs and racing

Matt
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Personally I think anyone's running quirks are so personal that it's hard to be sure what will work for anyone in particular. I think the best approach would be to get something and use it something like once a week until you know one way or the other. Lots of us use high cushion shoes because injuries force us to try them and we find it works. Much more recently we've got high performance cushioned shoes and that's a whole different thing. Are you battling with a recurring injury and/or looking for a pb on race day?

In very general terms my theory is high cushion is good for lower leg problems but not so much for knees and up. But having said, I think I'm right, that there are high profile people here who use some of the most cush shoes purely for knee injuries. Like I say, it's really an individual thing. If it's race day then I think the Nike next% is the obvious one now with interesting stuff on the way from others. If its an interest in being able to squeeze a few more miles out in training safely then my suggestion would be get some Hoka Clifton on sale so you aren't tempted to return them and just gradually do more in them until you know if they are for you.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
monty wrote:
the few old curmudgeons who are still hanging onto the clown shoe theme, while the give more than they should to their local PT...

As it so happens I am currently one of those curmudgeons who's giving to my local PT. I was building toward an off season run block and everything was going fine until about two weeks ago when my right achilles decided to shut me down. Since then all my "running" has been in the pool or on an elliptical. Maybe a pair of these marshmallow clown shoes will help me get back on track!
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [OddSlug] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
OddSlug wrote:
Are you battling with a recurring injury

Not recurring, but I am on an undesired break from running at the moment (see above)

OddSlug wrote:
and/or looking for a pb on race day?

Yes – who isn't!?

OddSlug wrote:
If its an interest in being able to squeeze a few more miles out in training safely then my suggestion would be get some Hoka Clifton on sale so you aren't tempted to return them and just gradually do more in them until you know if they are for you.

So the Clifton is a safe/recommended place to start? I was looking at the Rincon, but if it's easier to find deals on Cliftons then that may make the choice easier.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I don't think you're missing anything. If anything, if I were you I'd stick with the minimalist shoes!

I did barefoot/minimalist for about 2 years not too long ago after 20+ yrs of normal shoe running. It was one of the hardest, most frustrating things in terms of building up I did - I literally went from a sub 19 5k runner to not even being able to race at all for 6+ months since the transition was tough on my achilles (which I am lucky to not have any injuries with.)

The good things were many - I actually think most people who can run injury free with minimalist SHOULD go minimalist, for the following:

- Forces a proper slow mileage buildup. You can't just go hog wild one day and run 20 miles on a base of 5 mpw - your achilles will rebel and you'll halt pretty quickly.
- Forces much better run form in terms of good posture and balance on the feet. I honestly think Lionel Sanders would improve his stride form significantly if he tried minimalist shoes for technique improvement and slowly incorporated more of it - his clompy heel strike stride is nearly impossible with barefoot/minimalist shoes.
- Makes you much more aware of how to respond best to terrain changes with many different types of strides and cadences, which is great for form and run efficiency. (In contrast, you can bulldoze your way through the same terrain with big cushiony shoes, but it's likely slower and def a lot less graceful.)
- Light = FAST. I ran my fastest triathlon runs with minimalist shoes.
- And this is my theory, but one that definitely applied to me - since the minimalist shoes much more emphasize achilles/calf and spare the quad, you don't have as much run fatigue coming off the bike as you're engaging a different set of muscles (not just all quad). That was definitely true for me - was very noticeable to me off the bike where I'd just take off on the minimalist shoes since my calves/achilles were good to go after a hard bike.

Alas, I now run in big cushy Hoka Bondi 6s. I have MRI confirmed advanced arthritis in my ankles in my mere mid40s , and the minimalist shoes seemed to unfortunately aggravate the pain due to the higher forces on the lower leg/ankle (rather than quad). I'm happy to report that the cushiony shoes seem to have got me back to running as long as I keep my mileage not too high, but I def have taken a significant hit on speed and form as a result. Wish I could go back to minimalist, though, for all the reasons above.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A few notes:

- Hokas are high cushion, but low drop.

- Not all Hokas are created equal. Some are kinda firm. Some have more cushion than others.

- Cliftons were mentioned. I have some Clifton 4 and they're much stiffer than other Hokas I've had and have a weird arch fit. Supposedly the Rincon is more traditional Hoka-like.

- Hoka's midsoles seem to last forever. I just have the problem of the uppers tearing.

- There's nothing wrong with heel-striking. Some of the fastest runners in the world are heel-strikers and there's no evidence that it's bad or that changing it would help. https://www.sciencedaily.com/.../12/191212104646.htm


Afraid it's trial-and-error to find what works for you. I've been running injury-free for 30+ years and have tried just about everything from minimalist to Bondi, although most years have run in heavy motion control shoes because they stood up to my weight and there wasn't much else available in size 16 (I can wear 15 or even some 14s now). Maybe I could wear anything. Others seem to battle injury all the time no matter what they try.
Last edited by: HardlyTrying: Dec 18, 19 20:11
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Northy wrote:
OddSlug wrote:
Are you battling with a recurring injury


Not recurring, but I am on an undesired break from running at the moment (see above)

OddSlug wrote:
and/or looking for a pb on race day?


Yes – who isn't!?

OddSlug wrote:
If its an interest in being able to squeeze a few more miles out in training safely then my suggestion would be get some Hoka Clifton on sale so you aren't tempted to return them and just gradually do more in them until you know if they are for you.


So the Clifton is a safe/recommended place to start? I was looking at the Rincon, but if it's easier to find deals on Cliftons then that may make the choice easier.

I think the Rincon is a reasonable price but still a bit new to get deals on. Cliftons have been around a long time and you can normally get good deals on last years. I just find them comfortable. I've never tried the Bondi but that may just be the psychology of choice and not going the extreme. If you can find a Napali or a Clifton reissue they might be worth a go. The Hoka Fly range seem firmer in the forefoot. The Elevon is ok for instance I just prefer the Clifton. Dan has lots of Hoka articles here that are good reads.

I tried a Hoka you can't get anymore out of desperation with Achilles problems. At the same time I switched to a little and often approach rather than trying to do runs I'd done before with rest days in between. Someone here said tendons don't like too much load and don't like no load (except when it's acutely injured. So you are looking for the Goldilocks load that you personally can do today, tomorrow and 6 or 7 times a week while it gets stronger. It felt silly going out for a 10/15 minute run in clown shoes but it works and it's not long before you get confidence back and you can increase it. I am back to proper running now and I only get hurt if I do something silly like do a 12 mile on a whim I haven't built up to.

Good luck.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Chemist] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Chemist wrote:
I spent a number of years in different levels of ‘minimal’ shoes (as thin as the Vibram Five Fingers and Altria Sampson) and nothing over 20mm. I decided give Hokas (Bondi 6) a try after hearing so many many people rave about them. I wasn’t a big fan of them and after a month of doing half my miles in them (just too soft) I developed really bad Achilles tendinitis and had to take 3 months off to let it heal. Maybe it was just a coincidence, but I got rid of them and don’t plan on ever trying Hokas again.

That said I do like the 4% for fast runs and racing

I had the same story and I tried to correlate the Achilles with soft cushioning but could not find any scientific explanation. I am on 4% now since 2 months and I love them. I hope they will not generate the same injury...
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [OddSlug] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
OddSlug wrote:
[

I think the Rincon is a reasonable price but still a bit new to get deals on. Cliftons have been around a long time and you can normally get good deals on last years. I just find them comfortable. I've never tried the Bondi but that may just be the psychology of choice and not going the extreme. If you can find a Napali or a Clifton reissue they might be worth a go. The Hoka Fly range seem firmer in the forefoot. The Elevon is ok for instance I just prefer the Clifton. Dan has lots of Hoka articles here that are good reads.

I tried a Hoka you can't get anymore out of desperation with Achilles problems. At the same time I switched to a little and often approach rather than trying to do runs I'd done before with rest days in between. Someone here said tendons don't like too much load and don't like no load (except when it's acutely injured. So you are looking for the Goldilocks load that you personally can do today, tomorrow and 6 or 7 times a week while it gets stronger. It felt silly going out for a 10/15 minute run in clown shoes but it works and it's not long before you get confidence back and you can increase it. I am back to proper running now and I only get hurt if I do something silly like do a 12 mile on a whim I haven't built up to.

Good luck.

Unfortunately any Cliftons you can get on sale right now aren't good (too firm). The Clifton 3 was the last good one. The 6 is supposed to be more like the 3 but I haven't tried it yet. The Rincon is more like a Clayton. Super light but not as squishy as the Clifton, but would still recommend it over Clifton 4 or 5. The re-release of the Clifton 1 might be a good option as I see it's on sale now, but I'm not sure how much like the original it is.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Plissken74] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Plissken74 wrote:
Chemist wrote:
I spent a number of years in different levels of ‘minimal’ shoes (as thin as the Vibram Five Fingers and Altria Sampson) and nothing over 20mm. I decided give Hokas (Bondi 6) a try after hearing so many many people rave about them. I wasn’t a big fan of them and after a month of doing half my miles in them (just too soft) I developed really bad Achilles tendinitis and had to take 3 months off to let it heal. Maybe it was just a coincidence, but I got rid of them and don’t plan on ever trying Hokas again.

That said I do like the 4% for fast runs and racing


I had the same story and I tried to correlate the Achilles with soft cushioning but could not find any scientific explanation. I am on 4% now since 2 months and I love them. I hope they will not generate the same injury...

Are you racing and training in the 4%? I thought most runners use the 4% and next% primarily as race day shoes because neither is durable enough to train in consistently.

Either way, both these comments make it sound like there might not be a relationship between Achilles problems and soft cushioning given that you both like the 4%.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Altra says to use more cushion for foot pain, less for joint pain higher up.
That struck me as brilliant, especially as post spine fusion (Dr. says "Running? We'll see...") I've had the most luck with less cushion.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
I don't think you're missing anything. If anything, if I were you I'd stick with the minimalist shoes!
I did barefoot/minimalist for about 2 years not too long ago after 20+ yrs of normal shoe running. It was one of the hardest, most frustrating things in terms of building up I did - I literally went from a sub 19 5k runner to not even being able to race at all for 6+ months since the transition was tough on my achilles (which I am lucky to not have any injuries with.)

The good things were many - I actually think most people who can run injury free with minimalist SHOULD go minimalist, for the following:

- Forces a proper slow mileage buildup. You can't just go hog wild one day and run 20 miles on a base of 5 mpw - your achilles will rebel and you'll halt pretty quickly.
- Forces much better run form in terms of good posture and balance on the feet. I honestly think Lionel Sanders would improve his stride form significantly if he tried minimalist shoes for technique improvement and slowly incorporated more of it - his clompy heel strike stride is nearly impossible with barefoot/minimalist shoes.
- Makes you much more aware of how to respond best to terrain changes with many different types of strides and cadences, which is great for form and run efficiency. (In contrast, you can bulldoze your way through the same terrain with big cushiony shoes, but it's likely slower and def a lot less graceful.)
- Light = FAST. I ran my fastest triathlon runs with minimalist shoes.
- And this is my theory, but one that definitely applied to me - since the minimalist shoes much more emphasize achilles/calf and spare the quad, you don't have as much run fatigue coming off the bike as you're engaging a different set of muscles (not just all quad). That was definitely true for me - was very noticeable to me off the bike where I'd just take off on the minimalist shoes since my calves/achilles were good to go after a hard bike.

Alas, I now run in big cushy Hoka Bondi 6s. I have MRI confirmed advanced arthritis in my ankles in my mere mid40s , and the minimalist shoes seemed to unfortunately aggravate the pain due to the higher forces on the lower leg/ankle (rather than quad). I'm happy to report that the cushiony shoes seem to have got me back to running as long as I keep my mileage not too high, but I def have taken a significant hit on speed and form as a result. Wish I could go back to minimalist, though, for all the reasons above.

Seems like the simple answer is to just get a pair of these cushy shoes and work them in to the rotation. Some runs on more minimalist, some easy and/or long runs on pillows. Hope that the minimalist helps keep my feet/ankles/calves strong while the maximalist help add some easy miles.


That said, am I seeing some contradictions in your post? Minimalist helped you strengthen everything from the knees down but now you can only run in Bondis because of ankle arthritis? Or are the two unrelated?
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I’m just coming off a grade 2 calf strain, and haven’t ruled out my Hokas as the cause. Have the Napali (Rincon replaced the Napali) and the Clifton 4. I purchased some cushioned shoes (New Balance Beacon also) to help with knee pain, and it helped greatly. However after runs with the Naples my Achilles was sore, to the point were I had to take a day off to recover. Didn’t seem to have that issue with the Clifton 4 and my knee was pain free after the run. Then during a run in the Napali my calf tore. Could just be coincidence and I am going to slowly work the shoes back into my rotation because they were great for my knee pain reduction. Plan is to may close attention to the start of Achilles pain as the early indicator.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The ankle arthritis has been going on for decades, at least 10 yrs prior to minimalist shoes, from more than 20 bilateral ankle sprains from basketball in my earlier days.

I actually switched to minimalist shoes in hopes of slowing the growing pain in my ankles that was occuring every year as I got older, but unfortunately it didn't help with that, and now I'm fairly certain that the high impact centered on the lower leg from minimalist is limiting.

I do agree with what most scientists have found regarding shoes and cushion or lack thereof - no shoe eliminates the forces. The forces are just redistributed with various shoes. So some shoes send more forces to your hip, some to knee, some to ankle/achilles. It's likely prudent to use whatever shoe redistributes the forces to the areas that are your strongest and least degenerate. I actually thought previously that the cushioned shoes would dramatically reduce peak impact force at the least, but apparently even that isn't true - those peak forces are just moved around as well.

One pure speculative theory I have (definitely just pure speculation, I have zero data for it!) is that since knee arthritis is 10x more common than ankle arthritis (that is a true fact from science/medicine), the general running public might be better off barefoot or minimalist, as the forces are much more directed toward achilles/ankle/foot rather than knee. It's amazing how much force the achilles can absorb and return once you get acclimated to minimalist running - I would run up 15% grades with a fraction of the quad fatigue that I get in Hoka Bondi6s, but my achilles had to be conditioned enough to tolerate it.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [vonschnapps] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
vonschnapps wrote:
I’m just coming off a grade 2 calf strain, and haven’t ruled out my Hokas as the cause. Have the Napali (Rincon replaced the Napali) and the Clifton 4. I purchased some cushioned shoes (New Balance Beacon also) to help with knee pain, and it helped greatly. However after runs with the Naples my Achilles was sore, to the point were I had to take a day off to recover. Didn’t seem to have that issue with the Clifton 4 and my knee was pain free after the run. Then during a run in the Napali my calf tore. Could just be coincidence and I am going to slowly work the shoes back into my rotation because they were great for my knee pain reduction. Plan is to may close attention to the start of Achilles pain as the early indicator.

Yikes – sorry to hear about your calf strain. That sucks.


I'm starting to think finding the right shoes is more confusing than swim breathing patterns...
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've tried literally everything. Nike, Hoka, Newton, Merrill, Altra, Asics, Adidas, Brooks, Saucony, Inv8, Sketchers... you name it. Someone introduced me to minimalist shoes and I thought those are the right ones because I didn't know any better. You just have to try and see what's best for you. If I run long distance or short distance fast, I usually can tell if the shoes is right for me or not. Running form, style, distance, your weight, road condition, weather... there are so many variables, so just try different pairs and find out.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A very good article on Clifton v. Rincon.

https://www.steadyfoot.com/...lifton-6-comparison/

"I drank what?!?!" - Socrates
Poor Swimmer. Weak Cyclist. Slow Runner.
TriDot Ambassador / Sacramento Triathlon Club
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I rotate between some altra elantras and hoka cliftons. But there's a difference between the hokas that have thicker soles but minimal drop and some other more cushioned shoes that have significant drop.

The thing I like about those two in particular is that the forefoot is better supported. What I never liked about cushioned shoes before was that they were very cushioned around the heel but less so in the mid and forefoot (almost forcing you to heelstrike), which is why I found myself running mostly in more minimalist shoes.

I don't think switching to a more cushioned, but still minimal drop shoe will cause any running form problems. But which kind is a pretty individualized thing.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [OddSlug] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Been running in hoka Arahi for few weeks now, previously ran in saucony guides for years. Achilles pretty tender and getting bit concerned.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [vonschnapps] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
vonschnapps wrote:
I’m just coming off a grade 2 calf strain, and haven’t ruled out my Hokas as the cause. Have the Napali (Rincon replaced the Napali) and the Clifton 4. I purchased some cushioned shoes (New Balance Beacon also) to help with knee pain, and it helped greatly. However after runs with the Naples my Achilles was sore, to the point were I had to take a day off to recover. Didn’t seem to have that issue with the Clifton 4 and my knee was pain free after the run. Then during a run in the Napali my calf tore. Could just be coincidence and I am going to slowly work the shoes back into my rotation because they were great for my knee pain reduction. Plan is to may close attention to the start of Achilles pain as the early indicator.

I actually run in both the Napalis as my gym TM shoe (lives in my car bag) and my Bondi6 as my main shoe for everything else.

The Napali has good cushioning but at least for me, has a noticeably more forward footstrike tendency with a lot less heel striking. It actually feels more like a minimalist-style footstrike to me, just with a lot of padding under the front. My form with the Napali is definitely slightly different from my Bondi6 run style, where heel striking is even encouraged by the huge rear cushion.

Of course, with a more front-foot type strike, the more load will be placed on your calf and Achilles. So you do have to exercise caution if you haven't previously built up your calf/Achilles.

The Bondi6 is more forgiving in that you can literally clomp your way through your run my completely heel striking the whole way, even in ugly fashion, but I'm skeptical as to whether that's a better practice than the more correct and agile mid-forefoot strike once you're properly acclimated to it. (I don't race Oly or shorter in Bondis - too heavy and clunky.)
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:

The Napali has good cushioning but at least for me, has a noticeably more forward footstrike tendency with a lot less heel striking. It actually feels more like a minimalist-style footstrike to me, just with a lot of padding under the front. My form with the Napali is definitely slightly different from my Bondi6 run style, where heel striking is even encouraged by the huge rear cushion.

The Bondi6 is more forgiving in that you can literally clomp your way through your run my completely heel striking the whole way, even in ugly fashion, but I'm skeptical as to whether that's a better practice than the more correct and agile mid-forefoot strike once you're properly acclimated to it. (I don't race Oly or shorter in Bondis - too heavy and clunky.)


I loved both the Napali and the Bondi. Bondi is definitely much more cushion but actually slightly lower heel to toe drop. Didn't notice that I ran differently in one versus the other.

The Napali was apparently Clifton 3 with a different upper. I liked the Napali much better than the Clifton 4. Haven't tried the later Cliftons yet. Haven't gotten Bondi in awhile, stack seemed like a bit of overkill to me, but I might get another pair some time.

Once again, there's nothing more "correct" about a mid-forefoot strike. Just run. Nothing wrong with heel-striking.
Last edited by: HardlyTrying: Dec 19, 19 11:12
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was one of the people who laughed when I saw Hokas the first time - especially in the floral color ways early on. I thought they were completely ridiculous. I trained in Adidas Tempos (lightweight trainer with a small amount of stability). I was also chronically injured early on in my running career, and assumed I just wasn't made to run more than 25mpw without getting hurt.

I got a pair of the Speedgoat on a whim when I was sidelined by an IT band issue - at the time I was training in the Lunaracer (all-time favorite shoe) and the Tempos. I hated them at first, used them briefly (maybe 2wks) to get over the injury and then tossed them in the closet. A few months later I was trying again to boost my mileage to 40+ for a consistent period (figuring it was the definition of insanity to expect a different result after trying so many times), started to feel some of my common aches and pains, and pulled out the Hokas to give them a shot. They completely took the beating off of my legs.

The negative for me was that the super soft feel created a brief bout of PF, which I'd never dealt with before (was usually a sfx & tendonitis victim). I switched the insoles for a set I pulled out of my lunaracers (instead of the stock ortholite), and it went away (I would also assume that dampening the cushioning over more miles helped).

I can't give all the credit to Hokas for allowing me to finally train running with some vigor (consistent 40-60mpw pretty much ever since that buildup), because I used them as a tool to rotate with other shoes, which I think is their best use. Additionally, I made some other changes (increased cadence, slowed down my easy pace from 7-7:30 to 8-9:00, 5k race pace was 5:35 at the time). I still use them routinely for recovery runs, and I don't find them comfortable for anything fast (albeit again, I use the Speedgoat). High cushion shoes have a permanent place in the toolbox.

I currently am not using them due to a financially unsustainable affinity for the Nike Pegasus Turbo, which I think are one of the best all-around shoes available, super cushioned but also so fast. I rotate them with the New Balance FuelCell Rebel - not sure if those are considered high cushion.

"Don't you have to go be stupid somewhere else?"..."Not until 4!"
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
+1

I've been using low drop minimal shoes for all marathons. But this year I'm in 'need to change something' mood, so I'm going to give Hoka's a shot.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [ask77nl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ask77nl wrote:
+1

I've been using low drop minimal shoes for all marathons. But this year I'm in 'need to change something' mood, so I'm going to give Hoka's a shot.

Running about a month in Hoke Cliftons. They may (may!) be slower than minimal shoes I was wearing for many years, but recovery is much better. And I’ll still in the state where recovery is #1 priority.

I think I’ll continue using high cushion for a while, probably buy Next% for races.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Stubborn yes, Idiot no.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
High cushion shoes do not work for me, just due to my specific issues.

Growing up running cross country, I rolled my ankle so many times that now my ankles can roll all the way over without injury. I just hobble two steps, and carry on.

Except in high cushion shoes. When those things roll, it's bad for me. I had two bad ankle rolls for the first time in like 30 years when I was trying out Hokas. My first significant running injuries of any kind in decades.

So not for me.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
High cushion shoes do not work for me, just due to my specific issues.

Growing up running cross country, I rolled my ankle so many times that now my ankles can roll all the way over without injury. I just hobble two steps, and carry on.

Except in high cushion shoes. When those things roll, it's bad for me. I had two bad ankle rolls for the first time in like 30 years when I was trying out Hokas. My first significant running injuries of any kind in decades.

So not for me.

question for you. because, i... am... you. in what you describe above. so, going all the way back to 2010, this was my big, big reticence. did you actually have a case where you were in HOKAs and you rolled your ankle and this happened to you? or, are you pretty well sure that this is likely to happen, so you've made the decision to eschew this shoe type?

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
or, are you pretty well sure that this is likely to happen, so you've made the decision to eschew this shoe type?

No, it happened twice to me. Once was just running in the dark, and I missed a sidewalk crack, rolled. That sidelined me for about 3 weeks, which rolling my ankle has never done.

The 2nd was in a race. I was bombing downhill (my lifelong specialty). And I was in love with the Hoka for revitalizing that specialty. But rolled my ankle, and ended my race.

N=2, and it could have just been freak accidents. But being the first time in decades that I hadn't just carried on after rolling, it was enough for me.

I'm not anti-Hoka. I was loving them. And my ankles are genuinely freakishly messed up. They roll super easy. So it's a purely personal issue.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have the same exact problem with ankles - numerous ankle sprains in my earlier basketball years (7+ on each side) since my ligaments are completely torn in my ankles (MRI confirmed bilaterally) so my ankles are intrinsically unstable for lateral motion.

Running is fortunately predominantly a forward motion, with not much lateral cutting, but in the case of an errant curb descent or road/trail debris, I've definitely had my fair share of bad run sprains.

My last sprain came using the Hoka Rincon, 3 wks prior to a race - was so bad I couldn't walk for a week. I'll unfortunately get worse ankle cartilage damage from that one for sure - I'm now wearing hard ankle braces to limit sprains (even though they are still rare for me) on almost all outdoor runs save race day just to play it safe.

My main shoe is still the Bondi 6 - interestingly, the higher stack height isn't as big a deal on that shoe since it's a bit wider and flatter to me than the Rincon, which feel slightly more narrow and slightly more precarious for my ankle (I can definitely notice it). Needless to say, Nike 4% would be a friggin' disaster for me if people with good ankles are feeling perchy on them! I also think with the Bondi 6, once you break it in, you get a bit of central 'sag' in the foam that also helps buffer against rolls, and as well the lighter upper on the Rincon also gives you slightly less stability once you actually roll the ankle (I've had a few mild 'saves' in my Bondi6 on rolls which likely would have been full sprains with the Rincon.)

Still, if you don't have torn ankle ligaments, it's probably not an issue for most.

My most stable shoe to date has still definitely been the Brooks Transcend 3, which is an amazingly solid and sturdy shoe, with an awesome upper that lasts literally forever (way more solid than Hokas for sure, but comes with added weight.) Alas, the shoe is too firm for me now, despite the fact it's one of their more padded shoes. That shoe is almost anti-sprain due to its build for motion control - I really notice esp compared to the Rincons, which just feel dangerous to someone like me with my bad ankles.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
Slowman wrote:
or, are you pretty well sure that this is likely to happen, so you've made the decision to eschew this shoe type?


No, it happened twice to me. Once was just running in the dark, and I missed a sidewalk crack, rolled. That sidelined me for about 3 weeks, which rolling my ankle has never done.

The 2nd was in a race. I was bombing downhill (my lifelong specialty). And I was in love with the Hoka for revitalizing that specialty. But rolled my ankle, and ended my race.

N=2, and it could have just been freak accidents. But being the first time in decades that I hadn't just carried on after rolling, it was enough for me.

I'm not anti-Hoka. I was loving them. And my ankles are genuinely freakishly messed up. They roll super easy. So it's a purely personal issue.

i have had bad ankles since i was a teenager. i used to roll them a couple of times a year, and i'd be out. like you said. for weeks. and almost nothing is more painful.

i don't want to spike the football, but it seems over the last 20 or 25 years i've developed a defense. unconsciously. when my ankle starts to roll my body unweights that leg. and i mean this is way back there on my brain stem that this happens. that leg immediately unweights and i come down quick and hard on the other foot to compensate. i'm not nearly smart enough to execute this. my body has taken it upon itself to do this out of self-preservation, bypassing my decision portal.

i would say that, in my experience, this happens in HOKAs less often to me than it used to happen, that is, HOKAs appear to be subject to a roll less often, and i believe it's the cushion that's the reason. the cushion absorbs the lever action of the shoe hitting, say, a rock or a hole. i posit this because i did wear a HOKA - the old conquest - that was for me exceptionally unstable compared to the other models, because HOKA screwed the pooch on that shoe and made it particularly hard.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Interesting. Glad to hear corroboration. I might give it another go despite the risk My experiment was a long time ago, with I think the most extreme Hoka. It looks like things have dialed back a bit since then, at least in some models.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
. i'm not nearly smart enough to execute this. my body has taken it upon itself to do this out of self-preservation, bypassing my decision portal.

Ha, yes! I do that exact thing. I know it well. It's a key part of my downhill bombing barely-in-control survival strategy.

Like I just mentioned to lighttheir, I might give it another go. I was using very early Hokas (I'm a sucker for any new tech), and it very well might have been the Conquest that you mention.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I run the Zoom Fly 3 on the road but do not like them on the treadmill. I keep a pair of Saucony Fastwich for the treadmill

Very happy with this combination
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
Slowman wrote:
. i'm not nearly smart enough to execute this. my body has taken it upon itself to do this out of self-preservation, bypassing my decision portal.


Ha, yes! I do that exact thing. I know it well. It's a key part of my downhill bombing barely-in-control survival strategy.

Like I just mentioned to lighttheir, I might give it another go. I was using very early Hokas (I'm a sucker for any new tech), and it very well might have been the Conquest that you mention.

the conquest was a real miss of a shoe. among the 3 or 4 worst shoes HOKA ever made. there's a shoe coming out, the new elevon. 2nd generation. the original elevon was kind of nice, and actually shared some common elements with the conquest, but unfortunately one of those common elements was it was too hard. the new elevon i hope fixes that. we'll see. i'm eagerly awaiting this shoe because i'm currently running in the (reissued, only available online) original bondi b - a design now 9 years old - because it remains better (for me) than any HOKA made then or since for my own training. this and the carbon x are the 2 HOKA shoes i like (carbon x for racing and fast training, tho i don't really go fast enough to qualify for fast training).

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trail wrote:
Slowman wrote:
. i'm not nearly smart enough to execute this. my body has taken it upon itself to do this out of self-preservation, bypassing my decision portal.


Ha, yes! I do that exact thing. I know it well. It's a key part of my downhill bombing barely-in-control survival strategy.

Like I just mentioned to lighttheir, I might give it another go. I was using very early Hokas (I'm a sucker for any new tech), and it very well might have been the Conquest that you mention.

Interestingly for me, ALL my running sprains have been come during easy 'mindless' running, with most (?all) of them occuring during taper weeks where I'm going slow and almost recovery pace.

I never sprain my ankle doing anything tempo or faster. I'm pretty sure that the higher effort tightens everything (muscles, etc) surround my ankle and I'm also at heightened proprioception when going at speed and ready to instantly respond to any road irregularities.

It's the darn easy cruising where everything's relaxed/floppy, and you're daydreaming, then WHAM - overrolling on that curb drop for handicapped people, or that darn stick you weren't paying attention to!
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I like the Brooks “Beast”. Been on them for years and nothing that I’ve tried feels better. My feet are flat and that was a target in the design of this particular shoe. It rolls very nice running or walking.....for me. Everyone’s feet are a little different.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [Northy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
First rule of thumb is every runner is different. It was inevitable the pendulum was going to swing off minimalism. Hoka One One came out at the exact right time when guys like Monty were struggling to actually be able to run and others were coming off the minimalism bandwagon with nagging injuries. It doesn’t sound like you are either one of those. Well there is only one Monty.

More cushion doesn’t not lead to more miles. It can of course but so can any shoe. Ideally you own more than one shoe. I suggest 3.

1. General Go To shoe - One you know will work. When you feel like crap and don’t want to run, you reach for this shoe because you know it’s the difference maker. Personally that shoe right now for me is the Pegasus Turbo 2 from Nike.

2. Long Run Shoe - Any run 90 minutes or longer. You want a shoe that is going to continue to feel good through the entire run. Some runners do go to more shoe here but it’s not always the case. Personally for me it depends on the terrain. If I happen to be on the roads I use the Carbon X from Hoka One One. Rarely am I on the roads so it’s usually a trail shoe from Nike or On.

3. Race day shoe - This one you bring out for races and any time you are on the track or doing a track like workout on roads or trails. The idea is to feel fast when trying to run fast. For that it’s the Vapor Fly 4% Flyknit.


The right combination of shoes for you should be of great help to you running more miles. There isn’t one shoe that is going to do it. You are not the same runner day in a day out and if you are doing any structure your pacing is not the same day in and day out.

Dave Jewell
Free Run Speed

Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [SDJ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for chiming in Dave. I always appreciate seeing your shoe comments and insights on the forum.

After my last race this season I've picked up and tested out a bunch of different shoes, I think at least 9 different pairs in total (thank god for free shipping and returns!). My race day shoe, which also happened to be my everyday training shoe most of last season, is/was the Skechers Razor3. I still really like that shoe but wanted to add more variety to the rotation. After trying out a bunch of different shoes from several different brands with different drops and levels of cushioning I've currently settled on this as my rotation:

Cushioned daily trainers –
Nike Epic React 2 flyknit: highest drop of the bunch, I really like the fit and while they're cushioned I suspect they'll also do well for some tempo days (also tried the Peg Turbo 2 but did not like the fit)
New Balance FuelCell Propel: probably the most cushy shoe I've ever tried, also very comfortable, likely for easy aerobic base runs, and I got a pair for $44!

More minimal shoe –
Inov-8 Trailtalon 235: I still really like the fit of most Inov-8 shoes I've tried, great for trails, very flexible, great road feel

Race day shoe –
Razor3: very comfortable, I can run long in them, I can run easy in them, I can do track workouts and race in them

I also hope to finally try out the Vaporfly and the Endorphin Speed once they're out. I don't have any races for a while so I'm saving my $$ for now.

That said, I've been dealing with an Achilles problem for the past 7 weeks which has sidelined me from running. My hope is that, once I'm back, rotating through different shoes at different paces will help me build more miles and run fitness.
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [SDJ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SDJ wrote:
First rule of thumb is every runner is different. It was inevitable the pendulum was going to swing off minimalism. Hoka One One came out at the exact right time when guys like Monty were struggling to actually be able to run and others were coming off the minimalism bandwagon with nagging injuries. It doesn’t sound like you are either one of those. Well there is only one Monty.

More cushion doesn’t not lead to more miles. It can of course but so can any shoe. Ideally you own more than one shoe. I suggest 3.

1. General Go To shoe - One you know will work. When you feel like crap and don’t want to run, you reach for this shoe because you know it’s the difference maker. Personally that shoe right now for me is the Pegasus Turbo 2 from Nike.

2. Long Run Shoe - Any run 90 minutes or longer. You want a shoe that is going to continue to feel good through the entire run. Some runners do go to more shoe here but it’s not always the case. Personally for me it depends on the terrain. If I happen to be on the roads I use the Carbon X from Hoka One One. Rarely am I on the roads so it’s usually a trail shoe from Nike or On.

3. Race day shoe - This one you bring out for races and any time you are on the track or doing a track like workout on roads or trails. The idea is to feel fast when trying to run fast. For that it’s the Vapor Fly 4% Flyknit.


The right combination of shoes for you should be of great help to you running more miles. There isn’t one shoe that is going to do it. You are not the same runner day in a day out and if you are doing any structure your pacing is not the same day in and day out.

Dave
Would you recommend a Race day shoe or Long run shoe for an IM run. Usually around a 4:45 IM runner so not winning any awards here. Would the Long run shoe be better to help save my legs?
Quote Reply
Re: High cushion shoes: am I being a stubborn idiot? [mattr] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The current trend if you are racing which could mean racing for age group, racing yourself or racing the clock is to put on the Nike Vapor Fly. I don’t subscribe to that but I understand it. I don’t think you need a different shoe from your long run shoe but what I suggest is a fresh pair. One that has some running but still feels new. That change from an old pair to a new pair is always inspiring and you should be inspired to run.

Dave Jewell
Free Run Speed

Quote Reply