The past few days there's been Dan's article and thread about highly cushioned shoes along with a poll that's showing (currently) a plurality of people preferring highly cushioned shoes: 44% high, 34% average, 22% more road feel.
I started running around the time minimalist and low drop shoes started becoming popular and I was one of the people who laughed the first time I saw HOKAs. I thought they looked stupid and the idea of maximalist cushioning sounded anathema to the idea that shoes should emphasize the "foot's connection to the ground" as Dan put it. Nearly all my training and racing shoes have been low drop and pretty minimal cushioning (lots and lots of Inov8s, some Scott RCs, old Nike Free 3.0, etc.). The first shoe I ran in that I'd call cushy was the Saucony ISO Freedom. Then this past season I mostly trained/raced in Skechers Razor 3s, which I think are the most cushioned shoe I've ever had with 22mm of hyerburst in the forefoot.
I like the Razor 3 so I recently tried the GoRun Ride Hyper 8 (27mm forefoot, 33mm heel) but returned them because they felt different than what I'm used to. Taller, less flexible, less road feel.
Admittedly I've probably been biased against cushioned shoes, thinking (mistakenly) lots of cushion was like cheating and a way to mask poor form. But with great runners setting course records in these high cushion, higher drop shoes it looks like I'm probably being a stuborn idiot.
Has anyone gone from more minimal shoes to HOKAs (or similar) and disliked the extra cushioning? Anything to be cautious of with more cushion, maybe like "good for the knees but bad for the ankles"? Do people find they are more likely to heel strike or get sloppy just cause they can?
If some of these highly cushioned shoes means I can put in more and more miles with less wear on the body then I'll probably be a convert.
I started running around the time minimalist and low drop shoes started becoming popular and I was one of the people who laughed the first time I saw HOKAs. I thought they looked stupid and the idea of maximalist cushioning sounded anathema to the idea that shoes should emphasize the "foot's connection to the ground" as Dan put it. Nearly all my training and racing shoes have been low drop and pretty minimal cushioning (lots and lots of Inov8s, some Scott RCs, old Nike Free 3.0, etc.). The first shoe I ran in that I'd call cushy was the Saucony ISO Freedom. Then this past season I mostly trained/raced in Skechers Razor 3s, which I think are the most cushioned shoe I've ever had with 22mm of hyerburst in the forefoot.
I like the Razor 3 so I recently tried the GoRun Ride Hyper 8 (27mm forefoot, 33mm heel) but returned them because they felt different than what I'm used to. Taller, less flexible, less road feel.
Admittedly I've probably been biased against cushioned shoes, thinking (mistakenly) lots of cushion was like cheating and a way to mask poor form. But with great runners setting course records in these high cushion, higher drop shoes it looks like I'm probably being a stuborn idiot.
Has anyone gone from more minimal shoes to HOKAs (or similar) and disliked the extra cushioning? Anything to be cautious of with more cushion, maybe like "good for the knees but bad for the ankles"? Do people find they are more likely to heel strike or get sloppy just cause they can?
If some of these highly cushioned shoes means I can put in more and more miles with less wear on the body then I'll probably be a convert.