Correct.
To be specific: initial studies included a "loading phase" (typically 5 d, but sometimes longer), leading subsequent investigations to just follow along. There are also animal data demonstrating changes in protein expression as a result of dietary nitrate supplementation, which, given the turnover rate of most proteins, would generally take at least a few days to occur (or at least be maximized). Together, these publications established the idea that you need to ingest nitrate for multiple days prior to competition.
If you actually pay attention to the
data, however, especially in humans, there is (as I indicated before) very little, if any, evidence that the physiological effects of nitrate supplementation reflect anything other than just an acute effect:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547495 Sadly, this is often the case in science, i.e., ideas become firmly established in peoples' minds before they really should, and it is only upon further study/reflection that things get properly sorted out. Indeed, I recently had to educate a reviewer of one of our articles about this very fact (i.e., they had bought in to the notion that there was a difference between acute and chronic supplementation).
A couple of more dietary nitrate-related "facts" that aren't really as solid as reading even the primary literature would lead you to believe:
1) The effects that are seen are the result of changes in nitric oxide availability specifically in type II, or fast-twitch fibers.
This
hypothesis is based on the fact that, at least in rodents, the nitric oxide system plays a much more important role in type II vs. type I fibers. Andy Jones has therefore done a couple of studies attempting to demonstrate that this is also true in humans (e.g., by comparing the benefits of nitrate ingestion in subjects pedaling very fast vs. very slowly). In humans, however, endogenous nitric oxide production/action is just as high in slow-twitch and fast-twitch fibers, such that you wouldn't necessarily expect a fiber type-specific effect. Furthermore, when we analyzed data from subjects who functionally differed widely in muscle contractile properties, we did not see any correlation between an individual's apparent fiber type and the extent to which they benefited from nitrate supplementation:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29368802 2) Highly-trained subjects do not benefit from dietary nitrate supplementation.
It is true that highly-trained
endurance athletes seem to benefit less, if at all, from nitrate supplementation, at least when it comes to the effects on
endurance exercise. This could be due to frequent activation of the endogenous nitric oxide synthase system, leading to accumulation of nitrite and nitrate (NO -> NO2- -> NO3-). However, it doesn't seem to be true with respect to the effects of nitrate supplmentation on muscle contractile properties:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26641379 I discuss these issues in greater detail in this recent review:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001275