Derek M wrote:
I posted a follow up. https://www.marathoninvestigation.com/2018/07/pacer-accused-removed-results.html Thanks for that Derek. It seems to raise more questions... I don't get the whole pacing thing. 2016 he paces but can't keep up. 2017 he paces but then ducks off and starts pacing with another group, 2018 he paces but goes slower than the pace he was designated. Perhaps he needs to rethink his career as a pacer.
I think what he's done, he's cut the course, got the medal, got the official time and left it there allowing people to believe he ran a 3.35 when they look at the results. And he's got the pacer "cover" story. Anyone challenges me, this is what happened. "Now I'll remove myself from the results"..... If you've been racing a while you'd have a number of friends, club mates, family etc googling your results and sending you congratulatory messages. Even if he'd "forgotten" to remove himself from the results, those messages would have been timely reminders... only now he does that.
Is he capable of running a 3.11? Runners come in all shapes and sizes, but the quicker those times get, the smaller and leaner the guys become. I've never seen anyone with that build run a 3.11. Not saying it couldn't happen, but it would be rare to find a big unit that can run that quick.
He has a GPS watch that he uses in races, but never saves it....
Strange splits for the Mesa-Phx race, most of the guys finishing at a similar time had between a 2 - 5 minute positive split discrepancy, his was 22mins. He runs the first half in 1.28, then runs a 1.50.
He's a cheat who has covered his ass to some extent e.g with the pacing story. But when you add everything up, odd split times, not saving the GPS race data, getting the medal/photos, not getting the time removed, his physique etc Too many red flags.