Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Felix culpa in re Diamondback Andean -- customer service issue resolved
Quote | Reply
End result post: http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ost=6424495#p6424495
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I thought was the end to the Diamondback Andean saga when I posted my initial review on May 27, 2017 turned out to be the beginning of a more painful process, and this regrettable experience continues to this day. Diamondback has now had my irreparably flawed Andean frameset back for six weeks, and the company still has my money despite continued promises to refund it and just as many excuses for not. Even if I get the refund, I'm out over $1,000 on this purchase, and so much more in time and stress and logistics trying to make this bike work. And nobody has taken accountability, apologized, or issued a refund. They have the bike and they have my money. For six weeks. What is going on at Diamondback and how can it make sense for anyone to buy a bike from them?

But this isn't a shaming thread. This is a warning thread. Threads like this are worthwhile if they save one unwitting consumer from getting hosed by one of these companies that sells a faulty product and then responds to it with even worse customer service when one of us could have simply said "stay away". So I'm saying it: stay away. There should be no omerta in triathlon on this front.

When I posted my initial review on 5/27, I thought we'd solved the ongoing issues with the bike -- namely, I couldn't actually get that front end to stay straight during my normal riding conditions. On May 30, I went for a three hour ride with the brand new fork and brand new stem and 110% torque, carefully cleaned and greased bolts, freshly applied carbon paste -- you name it, I did it -- and 2.5 hours into the ride I stop at a light and look down and was just crushed to see this again:



Despite every effort to alleviate the issues -- three stems, two forks/steerers, multiple mechanical effort both professional (LBS) and amateur (me), hundreds of dollars in labor costs, and countless hours of time -- this issue was simply not fixable. As cursed as I felt, I suspect I was probably lucky. Because as stan said in the other thread about Factorgate.

slowman wrote:
went over a speed bump. a lot of weight leveraged in front of the steering axis. perfect storm.
there is engineering. and then there is the inputs that drive the engineering. the output is no good unless the input is good.

i don't know what happened with THIS bike (maybe there are facts we don't know). but when i look at the Felt thread, the Aduro recall, and so many other aerobars down through history, it ought to be obvious that leveraging weight in front of the steerer, and out the side of the extensions, creates engineering challenges.

that guy was damned lucky.


That's basically what's going on here. I ride these bikes in the lowest and longest configurations (105mm stem, slammed in this case). I ride horrendous roads, I just do. And I keep my elbows on the pads to get a little more reach and a little better head position, so when I'm hitting a speed bump, I put force on the ends of the extensions far in front of the steerer. So maybe it's just me, but I think the Andean front end interface is possibly the worst designed of any modern superbike even if the thing was appropriately fixed, for all the reasons I laid out in my review.

I was just paralyzed about what to do with this. I had the whole bike built up and Diamondback was telling me this has happened to no other person. So could I in good conscience sell it? Should I return it, and take the bath on the refund -- I had already sold the crappy stock parts and invested in top of line kit on which I'd get smacked upon resale? I ultimately decided to return it in early July. Here's the run down of the last two months:

7/13: I request call tag for the return box
7/17: Call tag provided by DB.
7/27: After ten dayes, I ask if the bike has been received and when I will receive refund.
7/28: DB says not yet, but says that "Once everything arrives it should be a pretty quick look over + inventory for the refund issue, taking just a couple days to go through our support folks, and then maybe a day or two to hit your financial institution as well."
8/1: DB confirms receipt of Andean.
8/4: Specific amount of refund is confirmed by DB, meaning inventory process has been completed. I provide address for mailing of check.
8/11: I issue request for status update on refund.
8/11: DB says "I will let you know ASAP to be on the lookout for it for sure. As of this afternoon it had not finalized yet, but I will check back again early next week for you."
8/18: Having not heard from DB, I email "It's been a week now, what's the update?"
8/22: Four days later still no word from DB. I get more stern: "Please provide a status on this refund."
8/23: DB rep claims crippling illness. DB states: "It does look like while I was out they both hit a snag and then have worked there way through it as to how the books are kept and they look to be in the home stretch. As you have been fully aware and accepting of a new process for us throughout every phase, I fully appreciate your patience. I have asked several points along the way to just be able to get you your money back in a more expeditious way and let the accounting sort itself out after, but Accounting/Ledgers etc are much more immutable than I would have imaged or have liked to get you made whole as soon as possible. I can give you a daily update until it’s completed at this point even if I have no news to give, and again I am sorry that it is taking this long. Thank you for your understanding and I will keep you up to date daily as mentioned if you like until resolved." The idea that this guy is going to send me an email every day is, on its face, preposterous. I'm lucky if I can get an update once a week. I don't respond. I don't want updates at this point. I want my money back.
8/29: The first unprompted update ever from DB comes. Hooray, it's good news from DB: "I have been told today that I should be able to make sure everything is on it’s way and settled for your remittance before the long weekend for Labor day. Thank you again so much for your patience and I will let you know again as soon as that is 100% the case and on it’s way."
8/31: "Happy Thursday. Things have progressed to a point where all the pieces are in place that the Credit could apply while I am out of the office. If it has not applied over the weekend, I will be back to checking on it daily/hourly until it has." DB wishes me a happy labor day weekend, after having reduced my chances of a refund from almost 100% to essentially "it could happen". I light this guy up in response, and if you saw the whole email history -- not just with the issues, but with the fulfillment -- you wouldn't blame me: "Business is all about expectations. With anyone, especially customers, you are much better off setting lower expectations that you are certain you can meet than you are setting reach or high expectations that you never will or don't or can't. Over promising and under delivering is a shitty way to treat customers and people and a really effective way to lose all credibility and trust. This isn't the power of positive thinking -- it's the principle of doing what you say you will and of meeting or coming close to meeting the (basically arbitrary) expectations that you yourself set. I look forward to your final update, which I hope will be borne out by reality."
9/11 (am): I have not heard from DB for 12 calendar days and 9 business days. I wonder if DB rep is checking "daily/hourly" for 12 days. At this point I give up. I file a PayPal dispute for "Significantly not as described". I inform DB rep that I have initiated a PayPal dispute.
9/11 (am): DB accounting responds rapidly through PayPal portal, promising an immediate return of my funds.
9/12 (pm): Immediate may mean different things to different people, but at this point immediate to me means within 24 hours. 36 hours later I still have no refund. I email Diamondback Accounting at ~5pm eastern. No response by end of business day Pacific time.

I have avoided this warning post for a long time. I was patient, after being told on 7/28 that the refund turnaround would be about a week (from 8/1). Spotty updates. Promises unmet. This is all frankly ridiculous. I don't understand how a company like this intends to stay in business, but I wouldn't buy another bike from them if there was $5K down in the bottom bracket trunk. Because that's less than what I figure I have lost from this debacle, all things considered. I don't know if I'll ever get my money back at this point, which is really a shame.

I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.

Buyer beware.

Edit: As of 9/13 in the morning, PayPal has ruled in my favor in the dispute. They have credited my account.
Last edited by: kileyay: Sep 15, 17 12:10
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sorry to hear about the trouble you are having with this bike. I think the moral of the story is buy a bike that looks like a bike, not a spaceship.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
i won't pretend to be an impartial observer, but I fail to see how they can defend their actions in this case.

----
@adamwfurlong
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Do they have liquidity issues? I don't see any other reason to not refund you other than they don't have any money. They might be using every last dollar to pay creditors and suppliers and you are being shunted down the line.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [T3_Beer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wow! What a disaster. Those bikes were going to be hard enough to sell to begin with, if I hear of anyone interested in a DB....I will direct them to your experience. Have you reported to the BBB? Thanks for sharing. Curious....does anyone from DB visit ST?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:

I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.

Buyer beware.


What are you trying to get a refund on? Just the frameset or your custom build?
Last edited by: Karl.n: Sep 12, 17 17:18
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
**Insert Jordan Rapp joke here**
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I gotta believe they are simply out of money or something. Refunds are not that hard.

At least you have a credit card or PayPal to pull the charges.

Sorry for the hardship.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Karl.n] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Way to quote the whole post...

Frameset it looks like.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Way to quote the whole post...

Frameset it looks like.

Actually, since they only sell complete bikes, I'm pretty sure he sent it back with the upgraded parts on it (at least, that's how it read to me)...

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was pretty much ready to throw down the coin on one in the spring, back when they were having lots of issues with delayed deliveries and broken promises on delivery dates.

I emailed them and asked how long of a delay I should expect in light of twitchers reporting delays. I was giving them every chance to be honest and give me a realistic idea; but there reply was, and I am paraphrasing - ' if you order today, 6 weeks at your door'
To me, that didn't pass the sniff test so I decided to in another direction.

Ask me how much I love my Kiwami LD Aero Trisuit
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Fixed it just for you.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The weird thing about that failure is that there just can't be much side load on the steerer while riding, no matter how shitty the roads you ride. The thing rotates freely in order to steer, so the first thing that would happen when you hit something is it would rotate, and yes your arms would put force in the opposite direction but there's at least some give there.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A is wrong, first time ever!
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A. wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
Way to quote the whole post...

Frameset it looks like.

Actually, since they only sell complete bikes, I'm pretty sure he sent it back with the upgraded parts on it (at least, that's how it read to me)...

No I had to take the bath on all the new parts I bought (at resale) and a bath on the new takeoff parts that were steady sold. Refund was pro rated for only frameset, $3k out of the $4500 paid, but I made about $1k on new takeoff sales.

I'm not complaining about that deficit. I'm complaining about the deficit between $3k and zero.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
What I thought was the end to the Diamondback Andean saga when I posted my initial review on May 27, 2017 turned out to be the beginning of a more painful process, and this regrettable experience continues to this day. Diamondback has now had my irreparably flawed Andean frameset back for six weeks, and the company still has my money despite continued promises to refund it and just as many excuses for not. Even if I get the refund, I'm out over $1,000 on this purchase, and so much more in time and stress and logistics trying to make this bike work. And nobody has taken accountability, apologized, or issued a refund. They have the bike and they have my money. For six weeks. What is going on at Diamondback and how can it make sense for anyone to buy a bike from them?

But this isn't a shaming thread. This is a warning thread. Threads like this are worthwhile if they save one unwitting consumer from getting hosed by one of these companies that sells a faulty product and then responds to it with even worse customer service when one of us could have simply said "stay away". So I'm saying it: stay away. There should be no omerta in triathlon on this front.

When I posted my initial review on 5/27, I thought we'd solved the ongoing issues with the bike -- namely, I couldn't actually get that front end to stay straight during my normal riding conditions. On May 30, I went for a three hour ride with the brand new fork and brand new stem and 110% torque, carefully cleaned and greased bolts, freshly applied carbon paste -- you name it, I did it -- and 2.5 hours into the ride I stop at a light and look down and was just crushed to see this again:



Despite every effort to alleviate the issues -- three stems, two forks/steerers, multiple mechanical effort both professional (LBS) and amateur (me), hundreds of dollars in labor costs, and countless hours of time -- this issue was simply not fixable. As cursed as I felt, I suspect I was probably lucky. Because as stan said in the other thread about Factorgate.

slowman wrote:
went over a speed bump. a lot of weight leveraged in front of the steering axis. perfect storm.
there is engineering. and then there is the inputs that drive the engineering. the output is no good unless the input is good.

i don't know what happened with THIS bike (maybe there are facts we don't know). but when i look at the Felt thread, the Aduro recall, and so many other aerobars down through history, it ought to be obvious that leveraging weight in front of the steerer, and out the side of the extensions, creates engineering challenges.

that guy was damned lucky.


That's basically what's going on here. I ride these bikes in the lowest and longest configurations (105mm stem, slammed in this case). I ride horrendous roads, I just do. And I keep my elbows on the pads to get a little more reach and a little better head position, so when I'm hitting a speed bump, I put force on the ends of the extensions far in front of the steerer. So maybe it's just me, but I think the Andean front end interface is possibly the worst designed of any modern superbike even if the thing was appropriately fixed, for all the reasons I laid out in my review.

I was just paralyzed about what to do with this. I had the whole bike built up and Diamondback was telling me this has happened to no other person. So could I in good conscience sell it? Should I return it, and take the bath on the refund -- I had already sold the crappy stock parts and invested in top of line kit on which I'd get smacked upon resale? I ultimately decided to return it in early July. Here's the run down of the last two months:

7/13: I request call tag for the return box
7/17: Call tag provided by DB.
7/27: After ten dayes, I ask if the bike has been received and when I will receive refund.
7/28: DB says not yet, but says that "Once everything arrives it should be a pretty quick look over + inventory for the refund issue, taking just a couple days to go through our support folks, and then maybe a day or two to hit your financial institution as well."
8/1: DB confirms receipt of Andean.
8/4: Specific amount of refund is confirmed by DB, meaning inventory process has been completed. I provide address for mailing of check.
8/11: I issue request for status update on refund.
8/11: DB says "I will let you know ASAP to be on the lookout for it for sure. As of this afternoon it had not finalized yet, but I will check back again early next week for you."
8/18: Having not heard from DB, I email "It's been a week now, what's the update?"
8/22: Four days later still no word from DB. I get more stern: "Please provide a status on this refund."
8/23: DB rep claims crippling illness. DB states: "It does look like while I was out they both hit a snag and then have worked there way through it as to how the books are kept and they look to be in the home stretch. As you have been fully aware and accepting of a new process for us throughout every phase, I fully appreciate your patience. I have asked several points along the way to just be able to get you your money back in a more expeditious way and let the accounting sort itself out after, but Accounting/Ledgers etc are much more immutable than I would have imaged or have liked to get you made whole as soon as possible. I can give you a daily update until it’s completed at this point even if I have no news to give, and again I am sorry that it is taking this long. Thank you for your understanding and I will keep you up to date daily as mentioned if you like until resolved." The idea that this guy is going to send me an email every day is, on its face, preposterous. I'm lucky if I can get an update once a week. I don't respond. I don't want updates at this point. I want my money back.
8/29: The first unprompted update ever from DB comes. Hooray, it's good news from DB: "I have been told today that I should be able to make sure everything is on it’s way and settled for your remittance before the long weekend for Labor day. Thank you again so much for your patience and I will let you know again as soon as that is 100% the case and on it’s way."
8/31: "Happy Thursday. Things have progressed to a point where all the pieces are in place that the Credit could apply while I am out of the office. If it has not applied over the weekend, I will be back to checking on it daily/hourly until it has." DB wishes me a happy labor day weekend, after having reduced my chances of a refund from almost 100% to essentially "it could happen". I light this guy up in response, and if you saw the whole email history -- not just with the issues, but with the fulfillment -- you wouldn't blame me: "Business is all about expectations. With anyone, especially customers, you are much better off setting lower expectations that you are certain you can meet than you are setting reach or high expectations that you never will or don't or can't. Over promising and under delivering is a shitty way to treat customers and people and a really effective way to lose all credibility and trust. This isn't the power of positive thinking -- it's the principle of doing what you say you will and of meeting or coming close to meeting the (basically arbitrary) expectations that you yourself set. I look forward to your final update, which I hope will be borne out by reality."
9/11 (am): I have not heard from DB for 12 calendar days and 9 business days. I wonder if DB rep is checking "daily/hourly" for 12 days. At this point I give up. I file a PayPal dispute for "Significantly not as described". I inform DB rep that I have initiated a PayPal dispute.
9/11 (am): DB accounting responds rapidly through PayPal portal, promising an immediate return of my funds.
9/12 (pm): Immediate may mean different things to different people, but at this point immediate to me means within 24 hours. 36 hours later I still have no refund. I email Diamondback Accounting at ~5pm eastern. No response by end of business day Pacific time.

I have avoided this warning post for a long time. I was patient, after being told on 7/28 that the refund turnaround would be about a week (from 8/1). Spotty updates. Promises unmet. This is all frankly ridiculous. I don't understand how a company like this intends to stay in business, but I wouldn't buy another bike from them if there was $5K down in the bottom bracket trunk. Because that's less than what I figure I have lost from this debacle, all things considered. I don't know if I'll ever get my money back at this point, which is really a shame.

I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.

Buyer beware.

I guess they can't keep up with the demand for/about this bike...at each and every level of their operation.

Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [windschatten] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Why would you quote the entire post?

Make Inside Out Sports your next online tri shop! http://www.insideoutsports.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Tom A is wrong, first time ever!

I wasn't wrong about it being unclear in the post :-P

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'd suggest you've been WAY more patient than most people ever would be, and certainly more patient than I. This is rediculous. I wasn't considering this bike (ever), but if anyone was even tempted... I don't know how they could be after hearing a tale like this.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just an awful experience.
If their accounting dept goes cold, doesn't PayPal issue the refund and then PayPal chases them for the $? Thought that's how their service worked as an intermediary, but could be wrong.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sorry to hear about that. That's a failure (looming failure?) that's completely unacceptable for a bike. Did they give you any reason as to why that might be happening to you? I'm just curious. IIRC you're not exactly a huge guy. The loads you might put on a 130mm stem with your arm position might be equivalent to what someone 6'2" 220lb would put on a 90mm stem with a less "stretched" position. To me that's not an unusual parameter.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
davews09 wrote:
Just an awful experience.
If their accounting dept goes cold, doesn't PayPal issue the refund and then PayPal chases them for the $? Thought that's how their service worked as an intermediary, but could be wrong.


You are correct.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
PayPal will take care of it in a heartbeat. They're good.

I just wonder if it was a counterfeit bike he bought, or if it's his fault buying direct to consumer, or something, something "friend"

wovebike.com | Wove on instagram
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [milesthedog] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There is no way the bike is counterfeit or that due diligence was not given in the buying direct process given the extensive backstory surrounding this exact bike and the reason for buying it. I'm not so sure PayPal will take care of it in a heartbeat as the claim is that the bike was not as described and therefore returned. However, what was actually returned is substantially different to what was originally sent (bike frame which has been modified vs whole bike). The question is whether the issues are a result of any of the changes that were made to the bike and if PayPal has to offer a refund for a purchase that was changed, used and then returned.

My guess it that Diamondback is trying to figure if they can claim the issue is a result of the wrenching/upgraded parts that were added to the frame. If they can claim the issue originates from anything that was done to the bike after they shipped it then they won't pay up. Now Diamondback's response indicates the issue is really with the original frame (or they would have stated the issue already) and they are just trying to find a way out of offering a refund. Overall I think the Andean was built as a concept bike and Diamondback never designed the bike or their sales system to handle actual orders and real world usage.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [scott8888] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
yes, that last part should have been in pink, and it was a bad joke referencing my other thread in which the buyer was blamed but in which the company did step in and make things right and completely regained my trust to the point that I'll be buying their products in the future.

and there's the thing, I fully trust that if the company stepped in, issued Kiley a refund, apologized, and offered a new solution for the front of the Andean that is safer, the company would instantly redeem itself and could continue building its brand in the triathlon space. But, the way they've handled themselves is horribly negligent if only in regard to their brand - I mean, they know Kiley published the aero test; how long could they screw him over before their treatment of him was made public? Why would they risk their brand like that? Have they thought this through? It just appears there are silos within DB that aren't able to be communicated across; I can only imagine Rapp has done his best to help get this resolved, and if his voice is ineffective, what does that say about DB? I think the most upsetting part is that we want to see companies do well in the triathlon space and we are patient and very forgiving, so for DB to muck it up so bad is really disappointing.

But yeah, PayPal isn't going to fault Kiley for upgrading the components on the bike he bought - it was his property and the stem issue is unrelated to the component upgrades. I've found Paypal to be so fast acting that I had to ask them to slow their retributive action down.

Dan could reach out to DB and say, 'hey guys, I'm running your ads full blast over here, don't f my people over.' kind of like the Stan version of 'let my people go!'

wovebike.com | Wove on instagram
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Is time to start a gofundme to battle Diamondback?

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [scott8888] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
scott8888 wrote:
However, what was actually returned is substantially different to what was originally sent (bike frame which has been modified vs whole bike). The question is whether the issues are a result of any of the changes that were made to the bike and if PayPal has to offer a refund for a purchase that was changed, used and then returned.

My guess it that Diamondback is trying to figure if they can claim the issue is a result of the wrenching/upgraded parts that were added to the frame. If they can claim the issue originates from anything that was done to the bike after they shipped it then they won't pay up. Now Diamondback's response indicates the issue is really with the original frame (or they would have stated the issue already) and they are just trying to find a way out of offering a refund.

This discussion occurred before I sent the bike back. The refund was promised. At no point in the discussion was the prospect of no refund entertained. If it had been, I wouldn't have stripped everything from the frameset and sent it back. Remember that I was working through the issues with the bike with Diamondback for two months, swapping stems and forks and the like. Now, obviously they aren't going to admit fault, which I can understand, but you need to give the customer back his money when we all know which party is actually at fault here.

I'm going to go with the theory about liquidity, or maybe mismanagement of fixed budget within this particular division of the parent company Accell. This parent company has a habit of hemorrhaging tens of millions of euros annually, despite selling well over one million bikes globally each year. And they are spending like mad men on this Andean project. They started with the most expensive design outlet in cycling. And this season they have been jetting around the world to every MDot race with half a dozen demo bikes in tow -- do you know how expensive this stuff is? They have multiple paid consultants from this message board alone, and of course there's the advertising:


Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [milesthedog] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
milesthedog wrote:
But, the way they've handled themselves is horribly negligent if only in regard to their brand - I mean, they know Kiley published the aero test; how long could they screw him over before their treatment of him was made public? Why would they risk their brand like that? Have they thought this through? It just appears there are silos within DB that aren't able to be communicated across


This is the part that makes the least sense to me. These guys know that I have a big mouth online. I have non-public relationships with several of them, and I generally like them. My initial review on the bike, which was far from positive, made the rounds at Diamondback, and they all read it. So this is the person you plan to jerk around for six weeks and refuse to return money to? It's mind boggling. I wasn't going to start a thread like this about the ongoing issues if they processed the refund and made it right, or as right as possible. But here we are
Last edited by: kileyay: Sep 13, 17 7:09
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.
Curious to know why you are going through so many bikes. What is your goal and strategy in your bike selection process? Could it be that DB is skeptical of your motivation and goals?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Brushman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
why would how often he buys new bikes have any impact on whether or not he was owed money? is motivation and goal is that he wants his money back. are you proposing that DB thinks maybe he doesn't want his money back?

----
@adamwfurlong
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [afurlong] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Count me in the liquidity camp. They may not have money to send.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
milesthedog wrote:
But, the way they've handled themselves is horribly negligent if only in regard to their brand - I mean, they know Kiley published the aero test; how long could they screw him over before their treatment of him was made public? Why would they risk their brand like that? Have they thought this through? It just appears there are silos within DB that aren't able to be communicated across


This is the part that makes the least sense to me. These guys know that I have a big mouth online. I have non-public relationships with several of them, and I generally like them. My initial review on the bike, which was far from positive, made the rounds at Diamondback, and they all read it. So this is the person you plan to jerk around for six weeks and refuse to return money to? It's mind boggling. I wasn't going to start a thread like this about the ongoing issues if they processed the refund and made it right, or as right as possible. But here we are

My thoughts have always been a customer service is everything.

IMO, one person's less than positive initial review of the bike won't scare away as many customers as one person's horrible experience with customer service.

They obviously think enough of the slow twitch community are potential buyers that they would run a lot of ads on here, and to be honest, it's been one of the bikes that I have been considering upgradong to, but stuff like this.....
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just curious, did you try a different stem? Surely looks like there's a clearance issue, keeping the stem in place.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Brushman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Brushman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.
Curious to know why you are going through so many bikes. What is your goal and strategy in your bike selection process? Could it be that DB is skeptical of your motivation and goals?

This is basically completely irrelevant and not unusual in this world, especially if you work in the industry or have connections or you just like trying different stuff, or even all of the above...
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Brushman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.

Curious to know why you are going through so many bikes. What is your goal and strategy in your bike selection process? Could it be that DB is skeptical of your motivation and goals?


This is basically completely irrelevant and not unusual in this world, especially if you work in the industry or have connections or you just like trying different stuff, or even all of the above...

I think 25 bikes in 4 years is a total waste of time and energy. I don't care how many industry contacts you have or how much money you have. A new bike every 2 months? The company that owns DB is unfortunately in a state of disarray and this is really a management issue with them.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davejustdave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was at a race on the gulf coast last weekend, and ducked into a local waffle shop (I was low on waffle after the race). They had a big sign on the wall with their mission statement on it - best mission statement I have ever seen.

"Please the Customer"

Let DB know their customer service is worse than a waffle shop.

I'm closer to the feathered end of the spear than the point.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [endosch2] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am sorry for you.

Quote:
I think 25 bikes in 4 years is a total waste of time and energy.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
Brushman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
I have had a lot of purchase, product failure, and return experiences as a consumer in this triathlon/cycling space. I've been through over 25 bikes in four years, at least half direct to consumer. I have never had problems this bad. Hell, my DHGate and Aliexpress experiences have been far better buying fake Cernelo frames and china crap components.

Curious to know why you are going through so many bikes. What is your goal and strategy in your bike selection process? Could it be that DB is skeptical of your motivation and goals?


This is basically completely irrelevant and not unusual in this world, especially if you work in the industry or have connections or you just like trying different stuff, or even all of the above...

Im with James on this. Kiley's buying habits have nothing to do with what DB agreed to. They agreed to take it back, they agreed to refund his money, and while they have taken the bike back they refuse to act on refund, which they AGREED to.

My YouTubes

Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [endosch2] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
endosch2 wrote:
I think 25 bikes in 4 years is a total waste of time and energy. I don't care how many industry contacts you have or how much money you have. A new bike every 2 months?

I don't know why I'm wasting the time or energy responding to this, but...

I like trying a lot of bikes. I like talking about bikes. I like riding bikes. I like new bikes, old bikes, cheap bikes, rich bikes. For a while, I had a pro triathlete girlfriend, and I bought her a bunch of bikes too, and I was sorry to see those bikes go. Sometimes I acquire bikes for friends pro bono. I just like bikes.

You're allowed to like other things.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Can we be friends? I have nothing to offer in the friendship other than a lust for a new bike and a need for a friend to buy it for me.

"It's good enough for who it's for" - Grandpa Wayne
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There are few things more frustrating than a company giving rubbish customer service, especially when that involves failing to refund money when they've already agreed to refund money. It's frankly quite bizarre.

With your connections though, I'm surprised you haven't managed to escalate things up the chain to someone who could fix this quicker, especially since posting this thread.

No developments?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
bullshit, you do not like cheap bikes

----
@adamwfurlong
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Lesson for us all: Never Buy Low Serial Numbers.


-bobo

"What's good for me ain't necessarily good for the weak-minded."
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
I am sorry for you.

Quote:
I think 25 bikes in 4 years is a total waste of time and energy.

Why? 25 bikes in 4 years is as insane as Floyd Mayweather only wearing a pair of underwear once.

25 bikes in 4 years is hardly enough time to get adapted to any given bike.[/quote]
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
For a while, I had a pro triathlete girlfriend, and I bought her a bunch of bikes too, and I was sorry to see those bikes go.
Zing! Off topic, but how do you have your garmin mounted in that pic? I tried doing something like that with rubber bands but it never seemed very stable/solid

Matt
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
endosch2 wrote:
I think 25 bikes in 4 years is a total waste of time and energy. I don't care how many industry contacts you have or how much money you have. A new bike every 2 months?


I don't know why I'm wasting the time or energy responding to this, but...

I like trying a lot of bikes. I like talking about bikes. I like riding bikes. I like new bikes, old bikes, cheap bikes, rich bikes. For a while, I had a pro triathlete girlfriend, and I bought her a bunch of bikes too, and I was sorry to see those bikes go. Sometimes I acquire bikes for friends pro bono. I just like bikes.

You're allowed to like other things.

You may like bikes even more than I do. AWESOME!

I agree regarding liquidity. I don't know if this was mentioned earlier in the thread, but I wonder if DB's decision to go consumer direct had impact on their liquidity.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for posting.
Lots of things about the bike and the company are troubling.
A lesson for all, including us.

Advanced Aero TopTube Storage for Road, Gravel, & Tri...ZeroSlip & Direct-mount, made in the USA.
DarkSpeedWorks.com.....Reviews.....Insta.....Facebook

--
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Pun_Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pun_Times wrote:
kileyay wrote:
For a while, I had a pro triathlete girlfriend, and I bought her a bunch of bikes too, and I was sorry to see those bikes go.

Zing!

Off topic, but how do you have your garmin mounted in that pic? I tried doing something like that with rubber bands but it never seemed very stable/solid

It looks like a Glen Alden carbon computer mount.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [milesthedog] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
milesthedog wrote:
PayPal will take care of it in a heartbeat. They're good.

As an update, just received this:

PayPal wrote:
We've completed our review and decided this case in your favor. You will receive a $2,929.99 USD refund from Accell North America Inc. The refund amount should reflect in your PayPal balance within 5 business days, if not sooner. If you paid with a credit card, the money is refunded to your credit card. Please note that it can take up to 30 days for the refund to appear on your card statement.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
i'm going to bet that you get no further communication from them, and that they are way too chicken shit to come on ST to address this publicly.

----
@adamwfurlong
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [afurlong] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
afurlong wrote:
i'm going to bet that you get no further communication from them, and that they are way too chicken shit to come on ST to address this publicly.

Along with others, I think the anonymous bike survey that Dan put up the other day was from DB.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
endosch2 wrote:
I think 25 bikes in 4 years is a total waste of time and energy. I don't care how many industry contacts you have or how much money you have. A new bike every 2 months?


I don't know why I'm wasting the time or energy responding to this, but...

I like trying a lot of bikes. I like talking about bikes. I like riding bikes. I like new bikes, old bikes, cheap bikes, rich bikes. For a while, I had a pro triathlete girlfriend, and I bought her a bunch of bikes too, and I was sorry to see those bikes go. Sometimes I acquire bikes for friends pro bono. I just like bikes.

You're allowed to like other things.

My current N + 1 = 4 is sadly deficient by comparison! Glad to hear you are getting a refund; and thanks for informing everyone about DB's customer service (or lack thereof).
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
milesthedog wrote:
PayPal will take care of it in a heartbeat. They're good.


As an update, just received this:

PayPal wrote:
We've completed our review and decided this case in your favor. You will receive a $2,929.99 USD refund from Accell North America Inc. The refund amount should reflect in your PayPal balance within 5 business days, if not sooner. If you paid with a credit card, the money is refunded to your credit card. Please note that it can take up to 30 days for the refund to appear on your card statement.

So does this mean that Paypal now goes after DB for reimbursement. Interested to hear DB's response.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Mike Alexander] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mike Alexander wrote:
kileyay wrote:
milesthedog wrote:
PayPal will take care of it in a heartbeat. They're good.


As an update, just received this:

PayPal wrote:
We've completed our review and decided this case in your favor. You will receive a $2,929.99 USD refund from Accell North America Inc. The refund amount should reflect in your PayPal balance within 5 business days, if not sooner. If you paid with a credit card, the money is refunded to your credit card. Please note that it can take up to 30 days for the refund to appear on your card statement.


So does this mean that Paypal now goes after DB for reimbursement. Interested to hear DB's response.


i saw some crosstalk offline. i think folks at diamondback were made aware of this issue, very probably because of this thread. i didn't alert diamondback. perhaps jordan did. in any case, i think some folks not involved in the refund process were rightly upset that a customer had not gotten proper service and they hopped to and got the refund processed.

beyond this, i think it's fine that this thread chronicled the laborious and painful process kiley went through, because it's one person's experience. i built an andean 2 weeks ago and i didn't have any of the problems kiley had. i've ridden the bike a bunch and have not experienced those problems. i have a lot of reviews i'll be writing of products that are hung on this bike, and in all of the building up and down, up and down of this frameset i haven't experienced any of his problems.

but this isn't to diminish his experience. maybe he was an early adopter and whatever problems he experienced were addressed before i got my frameset. maybe his problems were specific to using the stem he used on that particular bike (which is my suspicion). nevertheless, his experience is his, mine is mine.

this discussion was fine as long as it was simply kiley complaining about his andean experience. where it started to go off the rails was when it got highly speculative and conspiracy theoretical. there is only so much of that i'm going to allow.

EDIT: let me add that i *think* DB decided that he is deserved of a refund. i haven't spoken to DB about this, other than to say that i know that more folks inside DB were mobilized to make sure the case is correctly handled.

carry on...

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Last edited by: Slowman: Sep 13, 17 11:14
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Only sorry to see the bike go Kiley, not the gf? Sorry, thought I would lighten the thread up a bit.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
i think it's fine that this thread chronicled the laborious and painful process kiley went through, because it's one person's experience.

wasn't Milesthedog's thread also about his experience? why wasn't that fine? Just trying to understand the rules about posting re poor customer service.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
[/quote] For a while, I had a pro triathlete girlfriend, and I bought her a bunch of bikes too, and I was sorry to see those bikes go.[/quote]
Hilarious.

It is the mind itself which builds the body.
-Joseph Pilates
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [DarkSpeedWorks] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
Thanks for posting.
Lots of things about the bike and the company are troubling.
A lesson for all, including us.

Well, let's put this in perspective because i feel with kiley and i don't think he is treated the right way if he was promissed the refund. If he was promised the refund they should have taken care of this in a appropriate timeframe. No question on this.

But i own the Andean, and i like to play with bikes as well. When my Andean finally arrived i really wanted to put a zipp vuka stealth bar on the stem. I cut of the flanges up until a point that the vuka fitted, but i cut so much of the stem that i didn't wanted to use it anymore because i am not sure how safe that still is. I emailed them about my stem 'project' and i told them i needed a new one. Within the week it arrived in my country even before i paid for it.

I have taken it apart 3 times and rebuilt it also to play with the Di2 cables a bit. Every time the stem was loose and re-tightend. I have had no slippage, no play, no rotation what so ever. I do shaved off 2 threads from the pinch bolt but after that the stem and bars are rock solid. I have hit speed bumps, potholes and some other serious bad road surface. Nothing happened with the bars. Nothing happened with the storage door, nothing happened with the storage boxes on top. Everything stays where it should. No seatpost slippage and some questions i had were answered fast by DB or even faster by Jordan Rapp.

So my CS experience is very good and i actualy really enjoy the bike. I have owned a SC and a Felt IA FRD in the last 5 years. The Andean 'catches' less wind then the IA or let me rephrase this, it feels more stable in high winds.

I have just one complain on this bike and that is the press fit bb, or better, the removal of it. That will be my winter project. It is so tight in there that i just cannot get it out. I'm not sure how much force i am willing to put on it so i will discuss this with DB in the next few weeks.

So nothing wrong with the bike and i cannot recall having read from any other owners they are having trouble with the stem or bars. But i do think that they handled the situation with kiley poorly.

Jeroen

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [tri-run] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
tri-run wrote:
DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
Thanks for posting.
Lots of things about the bike and the company are troubling.
A lesson for all, including us.


Well, let's put this in perspective because i feel with kiley and i don't think he is treated the right way if he was promissed the refund. If he was promised the refund they should have taken care of this in a appropriate timeframe. No question on this.

But i own the Andean, and i like to play with bikes as well. When my Andean finally arrived i really wanted to put a zipp vuka stealth bar on the stem. I cut of the flanges up until a point that the vuka fitted, but i cut so much of the stem that i didn't wanted to use it anymore because i am not sure how safe that still is. I emailed them about my stem 'project' and i told them i needed a new one. Within the week it arrived in my country even before i paid for it.

I have taken it apart 3 times and rebuilt it also to play with the Di2 cables a bit. Every time the stem was loose and re-tightend. I have had no slippage, no play, no rotation what so ever. I do shaved off 2 threads from the pinch bolt but after that the stem and bars are rock solid. I have hit speed bumps, potholes and some other serious bad road surface. Nothing happened with the bars. Nothing happened with the storage door, nothing happened with the storage boxes on top. Everything stays where it should. No seatpost slippage and some questions i had were answered fast by DB or even faster by Jordan Rapp.

So my CS experience is very good and i actualy really enjoy the bike. I have owned a SC and a Felt IA FRD in the last 5 years. The Andean 'catches' less wind then the IA or let me rephrase this, it feels more stable in high winds.

I have just one complain on this bike and that is the press fit bb, or better, the removal of it. That will be my winter project. It is so tight in there that i just cannot get it out. I'm not sure how much force i am willing to put on it so i will discuss this with DB in the next few weeks.

So nothing wrong with the bike and i cannot recall having read from any other owners they are having trouble with the stem or bars. But i do think that they handled the situation with kiley poorly.

Jeroen

jeroen, i have done pretty much exactly what you have done with this bike, and my experience is the same, tho i didn't cut too much off the wings ;-)

i'll be writing about this bike with quite a few pics and in different configs. just, about the pressfit bb. how are you trying to remove the bb? with what tools? and did you read my tools article on the front page! i'm happy to help you unpress your bb.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [tri-run] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I believe the OP mentioned something very specific about his setup that could be impacting the performance of the bike. That being how long and low he rides it.

Mind sharing a photo of your bike? I'd bet its not exceptionally long and low.

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IIRC in kiley's original review of the DB he stated that he had a ton of trouble with the PF30 interface. both he and his mechanic had great difficulty removing the OEM PF bb.

there are only so many tools that essentially serve the job of banging the shit out of the BB to get it out, but Park Tool's newest BB removal tool thingy is pretty solid. but most bikes in my experience vary so widely in their QC as far as that specific area goes that bike to bike is pretty unpredictable in terms of 'ease of forced removal.'
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Reading all of this just makes me wish you had purchased a Falco.

Internet User
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wsrobert wrote:
I believe the OP mentioned something very specific about his setup that could be impacting the performance of the bike. That being how long and low he rides it. Mind sharing a photo of your bike? I'd bet its not exceptionally long and low.


his photo is going to look like my photo because it's got the factory stem on it. i have a theory. i have no idea whether my theory has any merit.



you'll note that this frame, in front of the head tube top, where the steerer exits, slopes up. this is okay if you use the factory stem, or a stem that follows this profile. but as you can see even the factory stem is built to really hug that profile. in my opinion it would be a mistake to try to use this bike as a long/low bike beyond the longness, lowness it currently exhibits.

in my opinion, just my guess, a downward sloping non-factory stem [EDIT, LATE ADD: or a slammed factory stem if an insufficient gap is maintained] is going to exhibit, along with the steerer, a natural bounce that's going to hit this frame from time to time, and that's why kiley's stem offsets. the stem hits the frame, on its bottom, and the bottom of the stem is forced to slide to one side.

this isn't a manufacturer defect. this is a poor frame choice given kiley's riding position and stem requirement, which kiley wouldn't have known about prior to buying the frame.



see where LAI is? that's where kiley is. he has precisely the same variance from the norm. it's not that there's anything wrong with kiley's position, but as you can see his position requires a very specific frame geometry, or a very specific bar. i just about always tell people with positions like this, your purchase is a tririg alpha x. that's your "frame". the bicycle frame is now the "component" that attaches to what is your primary necessary purchase.

in my opinion, but i'd have to calc this out, a tririg alpha c on the standard andean stem, or a similarly low profile bar like perhaps a PRO or an enve, that is the way to build kiley's bike up for him.

maybe i'm wrong in my analysis. i have zero data other than my gut instinct. but this is what my gut tells me. that factory stem is rock solid on the steerer. it's a round 1" carbon steerer. if you tighten your stem correctly and it still offsets, my explanation is what makes the most sense to me. that's the only way i could imagine force being applied in a manner so as to exhibit kiley's handlebar offset.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Last edited by: Slowman: Sep 13, 17 14:15
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Isn't Diamondback where Jordan went? If so did he just go from bad to worse as far as jobs are concerned.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wait i don't get it. did kiley NOT use the factory stem? what length is your stem? is it the same as jeroen's or kiley's?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
IIRC in kiley's original review of the DB he stated that he had a ton of trouble with the PF30 interface. both he and his mechanic had great difficulty removing the OEM PF bb.

i just built an andean and a plasma premium. they each use a PF bb, tho the size of the hole is different. they were each equivalently hard/easy to press in. i had to bang the bb in the scott back out because i put it in backward (got the right and left wrong). they were appropriately hard/easy to bang out.

at some point, it's just how bikes work. both these bikes were, to my feel, built appropriately.

jkhayc wrote:
there are only so many tools that essentially serve the job of banging the shit out of the BB to get it out, but Park Tool's newest BB removal tool thingy is pretty solid.

do you mean this?



i don't have any experience with it but anything from park is likely to work well. i use this:



and this:



and my massive deltoids and biceps.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
wait i don't get it. did kiley NOT use the factory stem? what length is your stem? is it the same as jeroen's or kiley's?


i heard or read he used a 130mm stem. did i remember wrong? i believe the factory stems are 95mm, 105mm, 115mm. so maybe i'm misinformed or misremembered. but i can't make those two facts square. either he didn't use a factory stem or he didn't use a 130mm or DB has a stem i don't know about.

EDIT: ah, okay, i see that at least in 1 case he used the 105mm factory. in that case i don't know what happened. the only thing that can have happened is that the stem and the frame contacted each other, which then makes me question whether all the head parts were installed. all i know is i can't reproduce the problems he mentions in the bike i'm riding.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Last edited by: Slowman: Sep 13, 17 14:03
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yea I've used the "expander'' thingy in the past, but use the first tool pictured now. Much better. And a hammer and some willpower.

I saw your fit this Saturday and cheered for her as "Dan Empfield's fit" because I couldn't remember her actual name. Only saw her on the run though, so can't comment on the fit ;) haha (although that obviously implies that the bike worked and the gearing selection was solid)

"They allayed my fears by agreeing to ship me both the 95mm and 105mm stem with the bike, so I could configure it to my wishes, which was a good compromise."

from his review. i think he went with the longer one
Last edited by: jkhayc: Sep 13, 17 14:03
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
I ride these bikes in the lowest and longest configurations (105mm stem, slammed in this case).
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
"They allayed my fears by agreeing to ship me both the 95mm and 105mm stem with the bike, so I could configure it to my wishes, which was a good compromise."

i went back and read it, and he said that, yes, he had this stem slammed. i keep coming back to the notion that slammed was overslammed. this was the thiokol o ring in this case.

i found this bike built to extremely tight tolerances, but i found every tolerance perfect. i think you can see in the pic i provided that the distance between the stem and the frame is not much. you take out a 2mm spacer the stem is going to contact the frame. you have to leave a little - 2mm, 3mm - gap between them because even if there was no flex in the stem (unlikely) there is flex in the steerer, between the bearings, and that's going to be transmitted above and below the bearings (in fork splay and what would you call it? stem splay?).

all i can say is that i can't replicate that behavior in the bike i'm riding. maybe jordan or jeroen have experienced something like this.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Have you ever ridden a Trek SC? Also, why was the SC not in the aero shootout? Seems to be a very aero bike and don't hear many complaints about it...

Pink? Maybe. Maybe not. You decide.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
I saw your fit this Saturday and cheered for her as "Dan Empfield's fit" because I couldn't remember her actual name. Only saw her on the run though, so can't comment on the fit ;) haha (although that obviously implies that the bike worked and the gearing selection was solid).

she had a successful ride. she made up about a third of the gap to the splits of the ladies who ride away from her historically. she's still got a ways to go, but some of that's training, and she only had 3 rides in the position and on the new bike. she's going to write about it in the next few weeks i think.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There is indeed very little room between frame and stem. If you forget to place one of the parts on fork the stem will indeed 'touch' the frame. But i did had some lateral play at first with the pinch bolt at the original length, shaving off 2 or 3 of the threads solved the issue completely. And i did rebuilt it several times just to fiddle with some parts. I now have it with a pd svet zero base bar that matches quite nice with the stem. But i do found that it worked also with a syntace stem and with the first vuka stealth integrated stem/bar from zipp. But you don't have the storage options with that bar system

By the way, i have all those bb removal tools from park. I even showed it to some friends over at shimano hq here and the mechanics there tried to get the bb out. But they stopped trying because they didn't want to hammer with more force then they already did. I was there and witnessed it and the bb didn't even moved a tiny mm. Nothing, and i want my rotor ceramics bb in it.....;-(

But beyond the bb everything works how it should.

Jeroen

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [tri-run] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
tri-run wrote:
i have all those bb removal tools from park. I even showed it to some friends over at shimano hq here and the mechanics there tried to get the bb out. But they stopped trying because they didn't want to hammer with more force then they already did.

you need bigger hammers.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [japarker24] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Are those serious questions?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
you'll note that this frame, in front of the head tube top, where the steerer exits, slopes up. this is okay if you use the factory stem, or a stem that follows this profile. but as you can see even the factory stem is built to really hug that profile. in my opinion it would be a mistake to try to use this bike as a long/low bike beyond the longness, lowness it currently exhibits.

To be clear, I would never have bought this bike if it didn't work for me from a pad x and pad y perspective with stock parts. Which I did.

I don't know what the cause of this was, but it wasn't a one shot deal. Like I said, we tried three stems and two different forks, and it just didn't work. Like Jeroen, I also shaved off threads from the pinch bolt.

My sense is that it's an issue with the single pinch bolt combined with the heft of the stock stem (and the tolerances between stem and steerer). I almost guarantee that a normal stem with two bolts and a standard carcass/body to it would have held pat.

Let me clarify my comments about how I ride differently than most people. I don't know anyone else who rides like that on the types of roads I ride in the configuration I ride. And yes, I ride in the lowest and longest stock configuration that this bike allows and provides for, and I ride very steep. But beyond that, like I have said, I put my elbows directly in the center of the pad. When I hit road turbulence, it hurts like a bastard on my elbows -- routinely, my pads break the skin at my elbow. So when I'm going 40 mph and I'm about to hit a storm hole cover I lift my elbows off the pad, and all the weight of upper body, which remember is very far forward, essentially falls on the tip of the extension. So there isn't distribution to the pads in these cases. That's a long lever, and I have a long cockpit. Yes, theoretically there shouldn't be horizontal force, but in practice there is uneven force applied. Occasionally -- for instance, if I'm texting or taking a selfie or something -- I may put a bunch of weight on one extension only, or one side of the cockpit only.

Additionally, the roads in and around the city of Philadelphia, where I do a big chunk of my riding, are utter garbage. I also get biweekly flats, even with tubeless setups with excessive sealant. Just because you flat twice a year on the same tires doesn't mean I'm doing something wrong with my tires.

All this is admittedly an extreme and unusual way of riding, and to be clear I don't think others will have this same issue, nor should they avoid buying this bike solely of my specific product issue. This post was primarily about the aftermath of all that, even as Diamondback worked with me to diagnose the product issue and in the attempts to fix it.

The way I ride notwithstanding, this shouldn't happen, which is why I sent it back and asked for a refund. The bike simply didn't work for me. It works for Jordan. It works for Dan. It works for Jeroen. It'll likely work for others, especially if DB ever gets their act together with the stem and front end.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [japarker24] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
japarker24 wrote:
Have you ever ridden a Trek SC? Also, why was the SC not in the aero shootout? Seems to be a very aero bike and don't hear many complaints about it...


Yes, I have, and it was maybe the best TT bike I've owned. But it's not all that easy to maintain or travel with -- or at least, not like my Felt. That said, I have a black-on-black 7 series on order. Should be here in November. Pretty stoked about it.

And the SC wasn't in the aero shootout because the relationship between the Speed Concept and P5 is well known, and both Trek and Cervelo agree that they are very close, with the P5 slightly better at low yaw.
Last edited by: kileyay: Sep 13, 17 15:44
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Slowman wrote:
you'll note that this frame, in front of the head tube top, where the steerer exits, slopes up. this is okay if you use the factory stem, or a stem that follows this profile. but as you can see even the factory stem is built to really hug that profile. in my opinion it would be a mistake to try to use this bike as a long/low bike beyond the longness, lowness it currently exhibits.


To be clear, I would never have bought this bike if it didn't work for me from a pad x and pad y perspective with stock parts. Which I did.

I don't know what the cause of this was, but it wasn't a one shot deal. Like I said, we tried three stems and two different forks, and it just didn't work. Like Jeroen, I also shaved off threads from the pinch bolt.

My sense is that it's an issue with the single pinch bolt combined with the heft of the stock stem (and the tolerances between stem and steerer). I almost guarantee that a normal stem with two bolts and a standard carcass/body to it would have held pat.

Let me clarify my comments about how I ride differently than most people. I don't know anyone else who rides like that on the types of roads I ride in the configuration I ride. And yes, I ride in the lowest and longest stock configuration that this bike allows and provides for, and I ride very steep. But beyond that, like I have said, I put my elbows directly in the center of the pad. When I hit road turbulence, it hurts like a bastard on my elbows -- routinely, my pads break the skin at my elbow. So when I'm going 40 mph and I'm about to hit a storm hole cover I lift my elbows off the pad, and all the weight of upper body, which remember is very far forward, essentially falls on the tip of the extension. So there isn't distribution to the pads in these cases. That's a long lever, and I have a long cockpit. Yes, theoretically there shouldn't be horizontal force, but in practice there is uneven force applied. Occasionally -- for instance, if I'm texting or taking a selfie or something -- I may put a bunch of weight on one extension only, or one side of the cockpit only.

Additionally, the roads in and around the city of Philadelphia, where I do a big chunk of my riding, are utter garbage. I also get biweekly flats, even with tubeless setups with excessive sealant. Just because you flat twice a year on the same tires doesn't mean I'm doing something wrong with my tires.

All this is admittedly an extreme and unusual way of riding, and to be clear I don't think others will have this same issue, nor should they avoid buying this bike solely of my specific product issue. This post was primarily about the aftermath of all that, even as Diamondback worked with me to diagnose the product issue and in the attempts to fix it.

The way I ride notwithstanding, this shouldn't happen, which is why I sent it back and asked for a refund. The bike simply didn't work for me. It works for Jordan. It works for Dan. It works for Jeroen. It'll likely work for others, especially if DB ever gets their act together with the stem and front end.

Sounds like you need a Flex-stem, or suspension fork...which would match the disc brakes, I guess ;-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Diamondback didn't do anything concerning the refund.

It was processed by PayPal as part of the SNAD complaint.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think I just need my season to be over so I can ride my gravel and mountain bike for the next six months. Just got back from slicing open the side of a $110 road tubeless tire and I've had about enough of all this.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
I think I just need my season to be over so I can ride my gravel and mountain bike for the next six months. Just got back from slicing open the side of a $110 road tubeless tire and I've had about enough of all this.

What road tubeless tire is $110?? =8-0

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
S-Works Turbo is $100 + tax.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
S-Works Turbo is $100 + tax.

I can't say I would recommend using that tire, even if it was less expensive...I've run a couple as a rear tire, and in both cases they suffered punctures that required plugging not long after mounting them. And I was using them in the same manner as I do my typical Turbo Cottons, which I rarely puncture. I know that flats can be a hit or miss thing sometimes, but the chance of it happening on 2 different tires on 2 separate occasions (separated by a period of time using a different tire) didn't seem to be completely coincidental.

Not only that, but in my roller testing, they weren't all that great speed-wise, especially considering that their mounted width was WAY above the 26C rating, even on a narrow rim (~27mm on an Open Pro and ~30mm on a Jet+).

So, IMO, they really don't have that much going for them...

If you want to run a reasonably durable road tubeless tire of about the same width, and ~same Crr, but at a significantly lower cost, you can't go wrong with the 25C IRC RoadLite. You should be able to find them for ~$50-60...

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Dark Mark] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dark Mark wrote:
Reading all of this just makes me wish you had purchased a Falco.

No one was THAT stupid.


Oh wait.... ;)

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
I have a black-on-black 7 series on order. Should be here in November. Pretty stoked about it.

I don't understand why any triathlete would not buy a Speed Concept 7 series.

/kj

http://kjmcawesome.tumblr.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
japarker24 wrote:
Have you ever ridden a Trek SC? Also, why was the SC not in the aero shootout? Seems to be a very aero bike and don't hear many complaints about it...


Yes, I have, and it was maybe the best TT bike I've owned. But it's not all that easy to maintain or travel with -- or at least, not like my Felt. That said, I have a black-on-black 7 series on order. Should be here in November. Pretty stoked about it.

And the SC wasn't in the aero shootout because the relationship between the Speed Concept and P5 is well known, and both Trek and Cervelo agree that they are very close, with the P5 slightly better at low yaw.

I thought you were sold on the Premier Tactical.

Let food be thy medicine...
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kjmcawesome] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
I don't understand why any triathlete would not buy a Speed Concept 7 series.

Because they got a great deal on one of the left over 9 series frames? Black and Red!
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Why wouldn't they be?

Pink? Maybe. Maybe not. You decide.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [BryanD] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BryanD wrote:
Why would you quote the entire post?

Because everyone else here does, on every other post?
Groupthink maybe.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [spookini] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
* there is also a reply button so you don't need to quote the entire post *

That said, what irks me as a consumer about this whole saga is not that K could have screwed up the bike by using the wrong components, or doing something to it / tweaking it that made it have the issues at had. What irks me is the fact that DB said that they would refund him the money, and then just didn't.

That's weaker than circus lemonade.

DB should have said that he screwed it up, and therefore he wasn't going to get a refund. Or, alternately, once they committed to giving him the refund, they should have just given him the damn refund. He shouldn't have had to resort to PayPal to get it.

That's the issue. Not what was done to the bike, not whether or not other people had the same issue, Etc. Either you're going to honor a warranty or not. And if you're going to honor a warranty, you pay up..

I'm one of those people who's out there looking at this, and thinking about how I'm planning on upgrading my bike because I want to try and get those few extra seconds out to maybe do something a little bit better than I did last year. At the same time, I'm also thinking about how my customer service experience has been with the company that makes the bike that I currently ride: Cervelo. Cervelo makes great bikes, but, since their bikes aren't made in heaven by Angels, occasionally one will be produced with a flaw, like mine was.. once I notice there was an issue with my bike, I contacted the company, and they replaced the frame, no questions asked, quickly, with zero stress.

That's kind of the point here. The issue with this particular bike could have been a one-off. It could have been a bad day at the factory where one didn't get laid up quite right. It really doesn't matter. There was a problem, Diamondback said they would fix the problem, and yet they didn't. Promises made. Promises broken. That's a big deal.

Just an average middle-aged consumer with a few bucks to spend on a bike who is trying to figure out which brand I'm going to spend it on talking here.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kjmcawesome] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kjmcawesome wrote:
kileyay wrote:
I have a black-on-black 7 series on order. Should be here in November. Pretty stoked about it.


I don't understand why any triathlete would not buy a Speed Concept 7 series.


I had a 12 year old Trek Mtb that got a seat tube crack, and Trek immediately replaced it with a brand new top-of-the-line Top Fuel, no questions asked. That's another reason to buy Trek. You can count on them.

My latest book: "Out of the Melting Pot, Into the Fire" is on sale on Amazon and at other online and local booksellers
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hahaha, i will try with a sledgehammer....

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I did neither read this whole thread nor the former thread, so if my remark is irrelevant pleas ignore it, but as I read this:

kileyay wrote:
On May 30, I went for a three hour ride with the brand new fork and brand new stem and 110% torque, carefully cleaned and greased bolts,

I had to think about this thread on greased bolts:

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/...ring=torque#p6407379

See especially post #7 of this thread.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
When I hit road turbulence, it hurts like a bastard on my elbows -- routinely, my pads break the skin at my elbow. So when I'm going 40 mph and I'm about to hit a storm hole cover I lift my elbows off the pad, and all the weight of upper body, which remember is very far forward, essentially falls on the tip of the extension. So there isn't distribution to the pads in these cases. That's a long lever, and I have a long cockpit. Yes, theoretically there shouldn't be horizontal force, but in practice there is uneven force applied. Occasionally -- for instance, if I'm texting or taking a selfie or something -- I may put a bunch of weight on one extension only, or one side of the cockpit only.

You forgot the pink font on the text I've bolded... at least I hope... you don't seriously text and take selfies when you ride do you?

As for your riding technique, you need thicker armpads for the small bumps and you need to get out of aero for the big bumps. Transferring all your upper body weight to the ends of the extensions on a long setup when you hit a bump is not gonna end well, sooner or later.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
That said, I have a black-on-black 7 series on order. Should be here in November. Pretty stoked about it.

Are you trying to be like me? ;)

Just curious.... were you not able to order a 9 series? I've been meaning to ask my LBS this but I keep forgetting to.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Why would anyone want to buy a 9 series?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
can't speak for kiley here, but i ride a NP2 vs. a P5 for the simple reasoning that it's 98% as fast (or closer) as the p5 but with far easier ''live-ability'' and it costs way less. i had a p5 for a few years; loved it. just don't wanna deal with that type of bike anymore. 7 series vs. 9 series is a similar dynamic, potentially.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [sp1ke] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Weight and stiffness.

And anyone that already has a 9 series and wants a new one but doesn't want to downgrade.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
can't speak for kiley here, but i ride a NP2 vs. a P5 for the simple reasoning that it's 98% as fast (or closer) as the p5 but with far easier ''live-ability'' and it costs way less. i had a p5 for a few years; loved it. just don't wanna deal with that type of bike anymore. 7 series vs. 9 series is a similar dynamic, potentially.

I get what you are saying with Cervelo but Trek isn't the same as the speed concepts are the same bike. The 7 vs 9 series are no different when trying to work on them or break them down for travel. The only differences between the bikes is the carbon.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ahhh, now that you say that i recall reading that the 7 and 9 are the same front end/rear brake. not like it used to be. whoops.

although that almost reinforces the performance:cost argument. identical performance, much lower cost ($1500 less? depending on 'deal' level)
Last edited by: jkhayc: Sep 14, 17 5:28
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeah on the old gen 1 sc, the bike were different and the 7 series didn't have the integrated front end. On the new bike the 7.5 model and above all had the integrated front end which IMO is the best buy since the bike was released 4 years ago.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
kileyay wrote:
That said, I have a black-on-black 7 series on order. Should be here in November. Pretty stoked about it.

Are you trying to be like me? ;)

Just curious.... were you not able to order a 9 series? I've been meaning to ask my LBS this but I keep forgetting to.

The 9 series is no more for 2018. Trek only has one "stock" model Speed Concept - the previous 7.5 with the new Ultegra group set and 50mm faired wheels at $4000. Stock Colorway is black on black. For a $500 upcharge, you are into project 1 and have a choice of 5 colors and component sizing.

For a superbike, I like the way Trek is approaching the SC. You can get a ready to race superbike with decent wheels at $4000. From there, you can figure it pretty much anyway you want it by going the P1 route.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [BBB1975] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That's what I've gathered online as well. I just haven't heard anything official from a trek dealer or someone who has recently tried to order a 2018 bike. And since Carl isn't there anymore, we can't ask him either.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I realize it doesn't really matter in terms of performance, but any idea on the weight diff between the 2017 9 series and the 2018 frames?
And, would anyone ever really notice the difference in stiffness of the lower end carbon??


** Edit - whatever the weight diff is, I -think- I remember Carl stating that a lot of the weight diff was actually in the seat post - carbon for 9 series, aluminum for 7 series.... Looks like the 2018 comes with the aluminum post.
Last edited by: SBRcanuck: Sep 14, 17 6:53
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JackStraw13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JackStraw13 wrote:
I thought you were sold on the Premier Tactical.

I'm not sure if I'm sold yet. There are some aesthetic issues with the (slack) post and of the paint job/decals and then there are still some product issues (can't use my own cups/pads). All of those issues are easily fixed.

Besides that, I need to spend some time with a demo Tactical -- once a small exists in the U.S. that hasn't been committed to a buyer -- for review purposes.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
Just curious.... were you not able to order a 9 series?


I didn't try. I'm getting the SC7 for $2350, and the SC9 would be at least 50% more. Plus I really dig the black on black, as opposed to the red on black.

No chance I ever would have bought last year's 7 series, with it's skinny fork and minuscule base bar airfoil, not to mention the color scheme.

But yeah, the minor differences in stiffness and weight just aren't worth the price premium for me. Funny where we draw the line on this stuff...
Last edited by: kileyay: Sep 14, 17 8:44
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
But yeah, the minor differences in stiffness and weight just aren't worth the price premium for me. Funny where we draw the line on this stuff...

what wheel product is currently sitting in your house...???
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
stevej wrote:
Just curious.... were you not able to order a 9 series?


I didn't try. I'm getting the SC7 for $2350, ...

Ugghh...not fair. That's about 2900 Canadian. Price at my LBS is 3999 + tax (15%) Can. :(
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jkhayc wrote:
kileyay wrote:
But yeah, the minor differences in stiffness and weight just aren't worth the price premium for me. Funny where we draw the line on this stuff...


what wheel product is currently sitting in your house...???

That wheel purchase decision would be best stated as follows: The major difference in tubeless compatibility vs. non-tubeless compatibility is worth the price premium for me.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [SBRcanuck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
there are still some Series 9 framesets available (black/red) they come with the nicer carbon, speedbox and the carbon fork so depending on your deal level with your Trek dealer it may be worth it. If not the new 2018 7 series frame looks the business.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [elf6c] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
elf6c wrote:
there are still some Series 9 framesets available (black/red) they come with the nicer carbon, speedbox and the carbon fork so depending on your deal level with your Trek dealer it may be worth it. If not the new 2018 7 series frame looks the business.


You mean post, right? They both have the same fork, no? Good catch on the speed box. It's about a 1k difference in price here in Canada, so the speed box knocks about 100 off that.. I have to admit I'd be tempted to get the 9 series...but thats just me. :)


- Whoops, scratch that, 2k difference here in Canada.. F*ck...
Last edited by: SBRcanuck: Sep 14, 17 8:58
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [SBRcanuck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SBRcanuck wrote:
elf6c wrote:
there are still some Series 9 framesets available (black/red) they come with the nicer carbon, speedbox and the carbon fork so depending on your deal level with your Trek dealer it may be worth it. If not the new 2018 7 series frame looks the business.


You mean post, right? They both have the same fork, no? Good catch on the speed box. It's about a 1k difference in price here in Canada, so the speed box knocks about 100 off that.. I have to admit I'd be tempted to get the 9 series...but thats just me. :)


- Whoops, scratch that, 2k difference here in Canada.. F*ck...

I would have to imagine trek is now including the carbon seatpost in there 7 series 2018 bikes. Considering this is their only 2018 offering and a lot of people will be ordering it with di2 so they need somewhere to put the internal battery. The 9 series carbon seatpost is required to mount the di2 internal battery.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [SBRcanuck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
yes, he meant post. the series 7 has a carbon fork and alloy seatpost

the world's still turning? >>>>>>> the world's still turning
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
The 9 series carbon seatpost is required to mount the di2 internal battery.

Putting it in the seat tube isn't such a big deal, is it? That's what I do with all my other bikes.

I'll probably end up drilling through the top of the post anyways so I can put the junction box under the saddle.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Per Dexter, 2017 7 series frame module comes out to 8.8 pounds. 2017 9 series frame module is 8.3 pounds.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
stevej wrote:
The 9 series carbon seatpost is required to mount the di2 internal battery.

Putting it in the seat tube isn't such a big deal, is it? That's what I do with all my other bikes.

I'll probably end up drilling through the top of the post anyways so I can put the junction box under the saddle.

The carbon seat post comes with threaded taps underneath the post and a metal mounting bracket to hold the battery in place in the seatpost. It's really freaking easy and brilliant. Sure you could probably rig something up to make the aluminum seat post work but why not just get the carbon one that is designed to mount an internal battery? If you can't get a 2018 9 series anymore, trek should be supplying their 2018 bikes with the carbon seatpost. You'll have to let us know when you get yours.

Are you referring to junction A or B to put it in the seatpost? If you are referring to junction B, just leave it in the BB. There's no issue doing that. No sense hacking up the seatpost.

If you haven't already..... read up on this.... https://trek.scene7.com/...t_Service_Manual.pdf

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just perfect how this thread has evolved into a 2018 7-series SC buying guide.

Regarding the seatpost for the battery install - I simply wrapped the battery in bubble wrap and jammed it in to the seat tube. Then used a couple small pieces of gorilla tape at the bottom of the post.

Regarding the junction box, I believe Kiley is referring to the SM-EW90 junction (the one you use to charge your di2 battery). Only peasants mount this junction on top of the stem cover.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm referring to Junction A. Zip tied to the rails. I don't want cables on my front end.

Yeah, it's a good point, maybe I'll ask the shop to upgrade me for the $150. But will pain me to drill into that.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
davews09 wrote:
Regarding the junction box, I believe Kiley is referring to the SM-EW90 junction (the one you use to charge your di2 battery). Only peasants mount this junction on top of the stem cover.

How does one route the cables to the JB in the seatpost when you run bull horn shifters and TT shifters?

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Extra B junction up front in the stem area
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Then you end up with this thing of beauty:


Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So you end up putting two of those junction B's in the front end since they only have 4 connections right? Assuming you are using bull horn shifters.

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Correct, unless you're using synchro shift or 1x.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
davews09 wrote:
Then you end up with this thing of beauty:

It looks results in losing the ability to carry a bottle behind the saddle though

Matt
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Pun_Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Actually I do have a BTS zip-tied. Can snap a pic and post.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Gotcha. Yeah, I'd be interested on seeing that when you get a chance

Matt
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Callin'] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I just ordered a 2018 Trek SC. I went project one because from what I could discern, the standard level bike came with the UCI compliant base bar. When you went project one, you got the deeper airfoil non-UCI compliant base bar and the speed fin rear brake cover as opposed to the standard rear brake cover. I found this odd as the fork was not the UCI compliant fork, so the bike would not be UCI compliant anyway. The website also says the standard bike has the alloy seat post. I cannot see if the project one upgrades to the carbon seat post or not.

Ryan
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
davews09 wrote:
Just perfect how this thread has evolved into a 2018 7-series SC buying guide.

You're welcome.

Pink? Maybe. Maybe not. You decide.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [ryans] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So with the recent relaxation of the 3:1 ratio, I would bet Trek is trying to dump some of the older UCI legal parts. For example, the speed concepts in the TdF used the deeper fork.

https://www.bicycling.com/...r-de-france/slide/20

we live in strange times where narrative has way more impact than utility or truth...
-SteveMc
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Funny how this thread completely changed topic ;-)

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
So you end up putting two of those junction B's in the front end since they only have 4 connections right? Assuming you are using bull horn shifters.

I just finished a build using the Di2 6-port junction B from an XTR external bottle bolt mount adapter for the Di2 internal battery instead of the two 4-port junction B wired together option. The 6-port junction B is a small cylinder with the same external diameter as the internal di2 battery and is under an inch long. This build had it tucked away inside a Zipp Vuka Stealth along with a D-Fly unit. I haven't worked on a Gen2 SC so I don't know if you have the space to tuck this away in the top tube.

For this same build I also went with a 2-port RS910 Di2 bar end Junction A wired inline with an extension shifter and coaxed into the back end of a Zipp carbon extension. There might not be an option for the RS910 in the standard SC monobar setup, but with your mono extension adapter setup this configuration could work. It is a tight fit with the Zipp carbon extension I.D. Much easier with the aluminum EVO110. Much cleaner than trying to find a spot for a 3 or 5 port Junction A up front. I like it better than the under the saddle option too.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hello, Slowtwitchers,

This is Steve Westover. I am the VP of Marketing at Diamondback and want to respond directly to this post today.

First, I want to publicly apologize to Kiley and the rest of the Slowtwitch community to say that we botched this for him. Due to a number of failures on our part within accounting, receiving, and PayPal, we failed to resolve and process this return quickly and to respect the time and effort Kiley put into this bike.

The Andean is purchased through the Custom Studio, which sends it out of our typical returns process. And in this particular case, it was a partial return, which was also unusual. Regardless, it shouldn’t have taken more than 10 days to process, and once we recognized some failures on our part we should have refunded the balance the old-fashioned way, with a check.

Over the course of the last few months, we worked extensively with Kiley to resolve all of the issues he has had with the bike. We sent new forks and stems and talked directly to him and his mechanic to make sure that he was completely satisfied with his Andean. We did this for Kiley, and we will do this for any customer who purchases a Diamondback. Unfortunately, we were not able to completely resolve the issue to his satisfaction.

Once we received the frame, we ran a battery of tests to pinpoint the problem and to see if we could duplicate the issue and discover if it is a widespread problem with the Andean. We identified a lubricant on the headset bearings that contaminated the surfaces on the steerer tube. This had a dramatic negative effect on the breakaway force required to move the stem, which is likely the result of the contamination. We cleaned the entire assembly with alcohol and applied carbon paste, then tested it to our specs and it exceeded standards by over 50%. This is a CPSC and ISO standard that we must comply with and pass. We test and verify our products internally and with a third party lab to assure compliance and safety. We have not had this issue with other Andeans, but as a precaution we have updated our user guides so this does not happen to anyone in the future.

We read, watch, and provide input into the Slowtwitch community and appreciate all the feedback — good, bad, and ugly — and thank you for making our company better. I can tell you because of this interaction we have made some significant changes in how we work with our customers, process returns, and our relationship with PayPal.

Thank you for keeping the triathlon community open and honest.

*Note - that we attempted to reach out to Kiley via phone multiple times today to apologize and confirm the refund along with giving him the opportunity to talk to our engineering team about our findings. We were not able to get him on the phone but we invite Kiley or anyone else interested to contact me directly to talk more about the issues that are being discussed on this thread.

Steve Westover
VP Marketing
swestover@diamondback.com
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Steve Westover] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Confirm the refund?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Steve Westover] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So this whole debacle started because Kiley and his mechanic fucked up the build ?
The guy has gone through 25 bikes, I'd hate to sell him a bike with the way he talks on forums.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Steve Westover] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks Steve. Responded to your email and received the voice mail. I appreciate the detail provided thus far and response to this issue. We'll talk tomorrow
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [TriguyBlue] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TriguyBlue wrote:
So this whole debacle started because Kiley and his mechanic fucked up the build ?
The guy has gone through 25 bikes, I'd hate to sell him a bike with the way he talks on forums.

Hey, shithead. It signals a hell of a lot of confidence in a product when that product is provided to me for assessment because of how I talk on this forums and because of my experience with bikes and components. And in these assessments, I am not unfair to the provider -- I give them every opportunity to work out the cause and offer a solution -- just as I did for Diamondback. I'm not Publius anymore. I genuinely want these guys to succeed. I SAID THIS. We want more innovation in this space and more firms with resources to deliver us products that enhance our performance and our experience as athletes.

If what Steve says is true, I think it's both fantastic and infuriating -- great if they have discovered the issue that will not afflict current or future customers, but angering in that it was not suggested before or run past the engineering team for assessment. Steve is absolute correct that DB did many things in the attempt to resolve this issue -- they were responsive and helpful, and I mentioned those things in my review. But I tallied $500 in service cost by the only wrench I trust in my 6 million resident city, as well as numerous pictures, dialogue, etc. exchanged. So if I "fucked up the build" somebody "fucked up" in their failure to tell me so.

Back to that confidence in your own product. I have on my review/editorial slate the TriRig Omni, the Premier Tactical, the Profile Design Aeria Ultimate, the 51 Speed Shop front end, and at least one product (and likely more) from Culprit, a company that is innovating in the component space right now. These are all provided to me and offered to me by the manufacturer, and the fact that these offers are made at all should instill confidence in would-be customers. Scared to let me evaluate your product? Big red flag.

Oh, and fuck you too.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It's always amazing to me how quickly you can get a response once you let others know publicly about bad experiences and the potential loss of sales.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Hey, shithead.

Oh, and fuck you too.

I know not everyone here feels the way I do but I LOVE this attitude & your unwavering willingness to stand up for yourself. You are one of the few here that does not hide behind an anonymous username & regardless of that fact you are willing to speak your mind & say what needs to be said. Don't stop being you!
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've been looking forward to your review of the Omni for a while. Any thoughts on when you'll have that out?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [turningscrews] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
turningscrews wrote:
kileyay wrote:
Hey, shithead.

Oh, and fuck you too.

I know not everyone here feels the way I do but I LOVE this attitude & your unwavering willingness to stand up for yourself. You are one of the few here that does not hide behind an anonymous username & regardless of that fact you are willing to speak your mind & say what needs to be said. Don't stop being you!

If you wonder why I stand up for manufacturers, retailers, race directors here, it's because of the difference between what industry and the consumer are able to say with impunity. Would you have felt good about the manufacturer's response here if it had begun, "hey, shithead!"

I'm Dan. No anonymity.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
turningscrews wrote:
kileyay wrote:
Hey, shithead.

Oh, and fuck you too.

I know not everyone here feels the way I do but I LOVE this attitude & your unwavering willingness to stand up for yourself. You are one of the few here that does not hide behind an anonymous username & regardless of that fact you are willing to speak your mind & say what needs to be said. Don't stop being you!

If you wonder why I stand up for manufacturers, retailers, race directors here, it's because of the difference between what industry and the consumer are able to say with impunity. Would you have felt good about the manufacturer's response here if it had begun, "hey, shithead!"

I'm Dan. No anonymity.

I wasn't praising how he responded to a bike manufacturer. I edited his long response to a poster who basically said he was full of shit.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [turningscrews] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
turningscrews wrote:
I wasn't praising how he responded to a bike manufacturer. I edited his long response to a poster who basically said he was full of shit.


i understood what you wrote and the sentiment behind it. just, i've watched for upwards of a year as diamondback, cervelo for its p5x, and any number of companies have gotten shat on and many of those companies have quietly been found to have produced very good products.

in this case, diamondback has been roundly shat on for producing a bike, selling it, dropping the ball on processing a timely refund (which it has acknowledged). prior to dropping the ball, in an attempt to satisfy the customer it did (as i understand it) send out 2 forks, 3 stems, and spent quite a lot of time trying to troubleshoot and fix a problem, which doesn't sound to me indicative of bad customer service.

this was a technical problem that i can't duplicate and that to the best of my knowledge no one else has been able to duplicate. i'm not going to go as far as the person who kiley lost his cool at, because i'm not prepared to dispute kiley's experience. i can only talk about my experience.

that established, one option is that kiley got a faulty bike; another option is that he didn't. i don't know which. just, as a former bike maker who introduced this category of bike you all own, boy do i have stories of consumers and shop mechanics! i say this casting no aspersions on kiley's experience, because it's his experience and i wasn't there.

over the past 5 years i've owned 2 speed concepts, a felt DA, i spent a fair bit of time on a cervelo p5x, i just built, rode and tested a scott plasma premium, and then there's this diamondback in my workshop, and there are some other tri bikes i'm forgetting. they're all great bikes. they all built up great, rode great, handled, started, stopped, adjusted, shifted. there's more breathiness and hyperventilation about the performance of products than is appropriate, because when these products fail to live up to their promise often it's because the products aren't properly used (and sometimes i'm the one who doesn't properly use them). in another thread right now there's a "failure" of a bike; no, it's the "failure" of the aerobar; in fact the user was riding pedestals 15mm too tall with screws 15mm too short. so, another couple of brand reputations are publicly trashed because of user error.

i love consumer reviews here on this forum, but consumer readers need to understand that consumer reviews are written by consumers. i'm not a consumer. i'm a former bike maker, who built his own factory, designed his own bikes, and designed classes of bikes that were paradigm changers. i designed the way you all are fitted to these bikes, via the various methodologies, most of which are offshoots of the math and processes that i built. i'm not going to list all my palmares as a manufacturer, i just write this because for all this i am very aware of my own shortcomings as a reviewer and a mechanic. because of this i am reticent to be critical of a product until i fully understand the function of that product, and if it doesn't work to my satisfaction i want to make double darn sure it's the product's fault and not mine. i think good reviewers must approach the writing of their text with this much humility. if you don't demand this as a reader then you end up no better informed than a voter making his ballot decisions after consuming russian news off facebook.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Last edited by: Slowman: Sep 14, 17 22:54
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [TriguyBlue] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TriguyBlue wrote:
So this whole debacle started because Kiley and his mechanic fucked up the build ?
The guy has gone through 25 bikes, I'd hate to sell him a bike with the way he talks on forums.
+1.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
turningscrews wrote:
kileyay wrote:
Hey, shithead.

Oh, and fuck you too.

I know not everyone here feels the way I do but I LOVE this attitude & your unwavering willingness to stand up for yourself. You are one of the few here that does not hide behind an anonymous username & regardless of that fact you are willing to speak your mind & say what needs to be said. Don't stop being you!

If you wonder why I stand up for manufacturers, retailers, race directors here, it's because of the difference between what industry and the consumer are able to say with impunity. Would you have felt good about the manufacturer's response here if it had begun, "hey, shithead!"

I'm Dan. No anonymity.

100%
Garbage like this thread could ruin a reputation based on nothing but a poorly put together bike. Sure the customer service wasn't great on the refund, but they've gone above and beyond on everything else and get shat on in this thred.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:

Would you have felt good about the manufacturer's response here if it had begun, "hey, shithead!"

does laughing = feeling good? Because I'd have definitely laughed if DB's post had started with "hey shithead(s)"

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Brushman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The ball drop with DB’s CS and the point of Kiley’s post has only in so much to do with the steerer that it was the problem which lead to the CS issue. Blame Kiley and his mechanic for screwing up 3 stems and 2 forks, great. BUT Kiley never came out and criticized the company for not working with him to resolve that failure, regardless if it’s a defect or user error. The concern and reason for the original post was that DB did not honor its word with Kiley and refund his money. Kiley had to go to PayPal, who sided with Kiley, to get his money back. It was only after Kiley posted in this space about the lack of DB’s ability to stick to its word did they try and contact him and resolve the issue.


Again, this issue is about DB’s DROPPING OF THE BALL ON THE REFUND and that tarnish is well deserved. Kiley is not trying to sling shade at DB for the steerer question and went out of his way to suggest that his experience could be an isolated case. The steerer is a moot point, but the refund and how DB handled that part of it is not.

My YouTubes

Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Back to that confidence in your own product. I have on my review/editorial slate the TriRig Omni, the Premier Tactical, the Profile Design Aeria Ultimate, the 51 Speed Shop front end, and at least one product (and likely more) from Culprit, a company that is innovating in the component space right now. These are all provided to me and offered to me by the manufacturer, and the fact that these offers are made at all should instill confidence in would-be customers. Scared to let me evaluate your product? Big red flag.

--------

You mention you have 5 products to reviews? How many previous reviews have you done. I ask because you make the statement that your lack of evaluation status for tri products sends out a big red flag.

And you may have done a tone of reviews that I'm unaware of, just wanted some clarity/background on your statement that it sends a "red flag" if you don't review a company's product.

ETA: and this isn't a knock just that when someone makes that type of declaration, I'm curious how they come to that conclusion.

ETA #2- where is a summary of the reviews you give? Threads on ST? Review website? Internal product type of review?

Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Last edited by: B_Doughtie: Sep 15, 17 3:46
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [LAI] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
LAI wrote:
Again, this issue is about DB’s DROPPING OF THE BALL ON THE REFUND and that tarnish is well deserved. Kiley is not trying to sling shade at DB for the steerer question and went out of his way to suggest that his experience could be an isolated case. The steerer is a moot point, but the refund and how DB handled that part of it is not.

This is the thing. That was the point of this thread, and it's pretty much of a straw man to focus on the product issue / to stress the customer service adequacy prior to the return (which I myself stressed in my prior review and on this thread). But if they solved the product issue, I'm glad they solved it. But again, not the point here.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [B_Doughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
B_Doughtie wrote:
You mention you have 5 products to reviews? How many previous reviews have you done. I ask because you make the statement that your lack of evaluation status for tri products sends out a big red flag.

Let me try to clarify. What the poster above suggested was that companies wouldn't even want to sell me a product, and I'm making the point that companies go out of their way -- because of confidence in the product they manufacture -- to offer that product up for me to review. Including companies that my alter ego did everything in his power to tear down!

But to answer your question, I've only done a couple official reviews, and one of them was so gushing that I was called a "shill" for 3T, but I have a bunch in the queue for this offseason. I didn't mean "if you don't provide me your product gratis, it's a big red flag", I mean that if what he says is true, that a company wouldn't even want to sell me a product given how I talk about those products here, then why? What does that say about the product?

I can call people shitheads if I want on this forum because I'm not selling you guys anything and frankly, if you don't like my perspective or my language, you can go get fucked. I don't call my buyers or sellers shitheads in my line of work. Usually. Okay, sometimes I do, but it's rare.

Stan brings a perspective of an industry insider and former bike manufacturer; I bring the perspective of a consumer who has experience with bikes and components and rides the hell out of both. I'm not a mechanic, just a regular guy. And if I made this kind of mistake and this was the result, then that too is instructive. But you should read both and all perspectives in your purchase consideration -- both have their place. Most of you guys are smart and can make up your own mind as to the truth. Put on your big boy pants and assess the information you have available.

There was a failure at Diamondback here -- that is not disputable -- and even if there was no product failure, there was a customer service failure on the back end. I trust that they will learn from this. I look forward to talking to Steve later this morning and moving on from this.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
There was a failure at Diamondback here -- that is not disputable -- and even if there was no product failure, there was a customer service failure on the back end. I trust that they will learn from this.
Agree.

In this situation Diamondback was way too trusting and generous and perhaps offered a refund prematurely.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Most of you guys are smart and can make up your own mind as to the truth. Put on your big boy pants and assess the information you have available.

-------
Kiley so that was sorta my point and I thought everything you said was cool until you added the "red flag" part about companies. If your trying to push info to consumers, by all means push the good/bad/indifferent. But let the consumers be the ones that decide whether it's a red flag or not for a company (it validates your thoughts much much more if you allow the consumer to come to that conclusion with the info you provide).

Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
turningscrews wrote:
I wasn't praising how he responded to a bike manufacturer. I edited his long response to a poster who basically said he was full of shit.


i understood what you wrote and the sentiment behind it. just, i've watched for upwards of a year as diamondback, cervelo for its p5x, and any number of companies have gotten shat on and many of those companies have quietly been found to have produced very good products.

in this case, diamondback has been roundly shat on for producing a bike, selling it, dropping the ball on processing a timely refund (which it has acknowledged). prior to dropping the ball, in an attempt to satisfy the customer it did (as i understand it) send out 2 forks, 3 stems, and spent quite a lot of time trying to troubleshoot and fix a problem, which doesn't sound to me indicative of bad customer service.

this was a technical problem that i can't duplicate and that to the best of my knowledge no one else has been able to duplicate. i'm not going to go as far as the person who kiley lost his cool at, because i'm not prepared to dispute kiley's experience. i can only talk about my experience.

that established, one option is that kiley got a faulty bike; another option is that he didn't. i don't know which. just, as a former bike maker who introduced this category of bike you all own, boy do i have stories of consumers and shop mechanics! i say this casting no aspersions on kiley's experience, because it's his experience and i wasn't there.

over the past 5 years i've owned 2 speed concepts, a felt DA, i spent a fair bit of time on a cervelo p5x, i just built, rode and tested a scott plasma premium, and then there's this diamondback in my workshop, and there are some other tri bikes i'm forgetting. they're all great bikes. they all built up great, rode great, handled, started, stopped, adjusted, shifted. there's more breathiness and hyperventilation about the performance of products than is appropriate, because when these products fail to live up to their promise often it's because the products aren't properly used (and sometimes i'm the one who doesn't properly use them). in another thread right now there's a "failure" of a bike; no, it's the "failure" of the aerobar; in fact the user was riding pedestals 15mm too tall with screws 15mm too short. so, another couple of brand reputations are publicly trashed because of user error.

i love consumer reviews here on this forum, but consumer readers need to understand that consumer reviews are written by consumers. i'm not a consumer. i'm a former bike maker, who built his own factory, designed his own bikes, and designed classes of bikes that were paradigm changers. i designed the way you all are fitted to these bikes, via the various methodologies, most of which are offshoots of the math and processes that i built. i'm not going to list all my palmares as a manufacturer, i just write this because for all this i am very aware of my own shortcomings as a reviewer and a mechanic. because of this i am reticent to be critical of a product until i fully understand the function of that product, and if it doesn't work to my satisfaction i want to make double darn sure it's the product's fault and not mine. i think good reviewers must approach the writing of their text with this much humility. if you don't demand this as a reader then you end up no better informed than a voter making his ballot decisions after consuming russian news off facebook.

--------------------

Amen

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think, in part, what happened in this particular thread is that the issues wound up being mixed up between the product end of things, and the refund that both Diamondback and Kiley agreed to in the end.

With regard to product - this is the unfortunate byproduct of forums; they inherently wind up take issues that are unrelated to the original topic of the thread and wind up in bad places. In this instance, people were ready to damn the overall product produced in this situation. I think this is what you speak to in your comment - that if you're going to be sure to blame the product and manufacturer, be 100% sure it was their fault. And yes, of course your experience is going to color your observation - just as Kiley's experience will color his prose.

However, this thread (although about what was deemed by both Kiley and Diamondback to be an issue with the product relative to the consumer's satisfaction) was about Diamondback's failure to issue a prompt refund. That's a completely separate issue, IMO, from the product itself. It's here where Diamondback completely failed. Based on all interactions, including Mr. Westover's post in this thread, Kiley got his chain yanked around undeservedly. That, IMO, is far more important to a consumer and to you as a former bike manufacturer than the product itself.

Things will go wrong. You know this. It's how your company responds during the course of that service that makes or breaks your company. Diamondback performed a lot of excellent service for Kiley, until it didn't. And when they didn't, they really didn't.

At the end of the day, I would still ride an Andean or a Serios, because I think they're still excellent bikes and I think Diamondback wouldn't ever let this situation happen again. But if I were to hear another story of a failed refund, I would seriously reconsider support of their company.

----------------------------------
Editor-in-Chief, Slowtwitch.com | Twitter
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Brushman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Brushman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
There was a failure at Diamondback here -- that is not disputable -- and even if there was no product failure, there was a customer service failure on the back end. I trust that they will learn from this.

Agree.

In this situation Diamondback was way too trusting and generous and perhaps offered a refund prematurely.

Are you planning on purchasing a DB or are you just aimlessly talking shit to Kiley?

Because I've read this entire thread and I'm no longer considering a DB. Kiley is not the one who broke his word in this situation.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [rrheisler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
before slowtwitch, in the 1990s, i was a regular on rec.sport.rst, the usenet newsgroup for triathlon. my user name was QRman, and habitues of that newsgroup were called RSTers.

one day a post showed up on that newsgroup entitled, "QRman screws RSTer" and detailed how my bad customer service failed this customer. the OP was met by a cascade of responses berating him. i posted once i saw the thread, and wrote something to the effect of, "thank you, but please don't come to my defense! i did screw this RSTer. i didn't mean to screw him. my policies governing our processes were designed not to screw him. however, screw him i did, because of a perfect storm of mix-ups."

this happens to every company. we had a guy here take his beef with 3T public and i don't know how to rank gerard vroomen and superdave in the heirarchy of taking care of the customer, but both are in the customer service hall of fame. somehow, sometimes, there is a mutation in the RNA of a company's processes. it seems pretty clear to me that diamondback's customer service response to kiley was blameless and comprehensive. until it wasn't.

and then we had this thread here which is basically a modern day, "DBman screws STer," with which as you see i'm familiar, and to which the company responded. you are right to conclude it's a strike against the company. but i was sent a draft of steve westover's response (posted above) just before steve posted it on the forum, and that told me most of what i need to know about this company that i didn't know already.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Last edited by: Slowman: Sep 15, 17 8:20
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [dhr] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dhr wrote:
Brushman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
There was a failure at Diamondback here -- that is not disputable -- and even if there was no product failure, there was a customer service failure on the back end. I trust that they will learn from this.

Agree.

In this situation Diamondback was way too trusting and generous and perhaps offered a refund prematurely.


Are you planning on purchasing a DB or are you just aimlessly talking shit to Kiley?

Because I've read this entire thread and I'm no longer considering a DB. Kiley is not the one who broke his word in this situation.




Kilyay is going to talk to DB and straighten things out. DB acknowledged there was an issue and are fixing it. If the physical problem has been solved then likely Kilyay would ride the bike and DB should be praised for getting to the bottom of it.

mistakes happen. people get wound up. reasonable people move on.

I would consider a BD because of this thread. DB aren't on this thread bashing Kilyay or other deflective tactics. Their post came a day or so after the initial post. This makes me believe they were making sure they had all the info before they muddied the water further.. The post here is sticking to the facts. Is telling us what happened in a mature and reasonable way. They have tried to sort out the issue with their bike and think they may in fact have sorted the problem.

I wonder if they would let Kilyay 'borrow' a bike for a bit and see if the problem is resolved. i wonder if Kilyay would be willing to take the bike back and provide a review.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Steve Westover] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Surely I can't be the only one who has a hard time buying that the problem was magically solved by cleaning the steerer tube? If that's the case, I could/should have experienced several catastrophic crashes, yet have NEVER experienced this issue.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JASpencer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Its common knowledge not to grease or get grease on a carbon steerer tube for this reason. Not saying they greased it but its been stated that this can happen if grease gets on the steerer tube clamping surface.
grease plus a too narrow steerer or to wide stem could be just add up to the perfect storm.

2019 T-Rex Tri Series
Last edited by: mknight84: Sep 15, 17 8:20
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JASpencer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
When are we going to talk about Speed Concepts again?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Right. I think I would specifically call to attention that the response Steve posted is exactly the kind of response that restores people's confidence in a company through adversity. That kind of response (and yours, admitting failure) IMO is perfect.

----------------------------------
Editor-in-Chief, Slowtwitch.com | Twitter
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JASpencer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JASpencer wrote:
Surely I can't be the only one who has a hard time buying that the problem was magically solved by cleaning the steerer tube? If that's the case, I could/should have experienced several catastrophic crashes, yet have NEVER experienced this issue.


at the same time iam sure there is people, thinking how is it not possible to get this stem tight enough.
using a shimmy made of a soda can ( ie similar to what cervelo used for the old alu cervelo p3 seat post clamp )
that would have certainly been the first thing i would have tried had i felt that either fork was a bit too narrow or stem a bit too wide.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JASpencer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JASpencer wrote:
Surely I can't be the only one who has a hard time buying that the problem was magically solved by cleaning the steerer tube? If that's the case, I could/should have experienced several catastrophic crashes, yet have NEVER experienced this issue.

This I can understand, but since it is just a matter of stem-on-fork clamping issue I also have a hard time in getting that several stems, at least 3 forks if I read it correctly and none of the several stem / fork combinations seem to have worked. Which I find hard to get since I got my Andean just after Kiley wrote his first initial review were he mentioned this issue for the first time so i think we have had the same type of frame/fork. No updates or something done on them. It was him that set me on the right track to shave of a few mm from the pinching bolt to get the stem clamped tight as hell on the steerer column. And he was spot on, because with the extra few mm on the pinching bolt I couldn't get it tight. But the few mm shaved of solved the issue completely.

Since I f*ckd up one stem by trying to be creative with it, I received another and this had also no issues with that second stem. And you bet that those first few weeks of riding I stopped several times to re-check and double check play on the head set or movement of the stem and bars due to Kiley's initial review. I rode with my Torque wrench at hand to see if the pinch bolt would come loose, if there was play in the headset or in the cap and bolt on top of the stem.

It was just after 2 months that I have had enough 'faith' that everything was secure that I put the hard top box on top of the stem. What ever I did, after rebuilding it several times, the stem never came loose, the bars were as tight as they could be, I hit some nasty bumps and potholes. Nothing that could replicate the issue that Kiley had (other then that ultra super tight bb he also mentioned)

Which makes me wonder what it could have been that several stems, 3 different forks not could solve and as far as i read happened to no one else that ownes a DB Andean. Not saying that it didn't happen with Kiley's bike, but how small are the changes that he got 3 forks that were off in diameter and/or got several stems that all didn't work. Or did he and/or the mechanic did something on all those forks/stem/builts over and over again that made the same issue repeat itself.

Maybe a standard way, a routine if you would like, on how some parts were greased, lubed or whatever that on a different bike's stem/fork combo don't matter but just with this specific set created the issue and thus it kept coming back.
Not accusing anyone, just really curious since I own an Andean.

Jeroen

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [rhayden] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rhayden wrote:
Kilyay is going to talk to DB and straighten things out. DB acknowledged there was an issue and are fixing it. If the physical problem has been solved then likely Kilyay would ride the bike and DB should be praised for getting to the bottom of it.

mistakes happen. people get wound up. reasonable people move on.

I would consider a BD because of this thread. DB aren't on this thread bashing Kilyay or other deflective tactics. Their post came a day or so after the initial post. This makes me believe they were making sure they had all the info before they muddied the water further.. The post here is sticking to the facts. Is telling us what happened in a mature and reasonable way. They have tried to sort out the issue with their bike and think they may in fact have sorted the problem.

I wonder if they would let Kilyay 'borrow' a bike for a bit and see if the problem is resolved. i wonder if Kilyay would be willing to take the bike back and provide a review.

Absolutely. But, of course, my point was about attacking the messenger here. Kiley's original post wasn't in error. It was a negative customer service experience.

DB has seemingly done alright outside of the refund issue. Some people are okay with that and will consider purchasing a bike in spite of the problem. Unfortunately, I don't have time to get involved with a potential problem like that. So I move on. I like to learn from others' mistakes, as well.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [tri-run] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm well aware one shouldn't lube a steerer, as I'd assume any reputable mechanic would as well. I'm curious as to what steps DB took to ensure the issue was in fact related to the assembly and not a very forward, very long, and very low position putting a lot of leverage on a cut down steerer.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JASpencer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JASpencer wrote:
I'm well aware one shouldn't lube a steerer, as I'd assume any reputable mechanic would as well. I'm curious as to what steps DB took to ensure the issue was in fact related to the assembly and not a very forward, very long, and very low position putting a lot of leverage on a cut down steerer.


Do you perhaps have Kiley's set up, or if Kiley reads this maybe he can give his dimensions. Although we are on different frame sizes I wonder if I could duplicate the same sort of leverage. It might not be 100% perfect but just to see how close I can get and see how much leverage difference there is and if i can replicate the issue.

It would be interesting, for both / all parties involved, if they could ship the bike, with their built, back to him and see what happens. That would clear all the issues. If I was DB I would do this just to clear things up and in the end show that nothing was wrong with the specific parts used. Or if it was the set up that was too long and too low that the leverage was too high they just would have said that. Now it just got this who is right and what is the truth feeling hanging around it.

Jeroen

Owner at TRIPRO, The Netherlands
Last edited by: tri-run: Sep 15, 17 10:13
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That was quite a lot to write - when detailing that you're simply pro manufacturer would suffice. With seeming no ability to feign objectivity. Or attempt to understand how consumers could be sold bikes, that are now exceedingly complicated and surpass the level of knowledge and expertise available at their local LBS. And in those situations, its the consumers fault. In your opinion at least. In Kileys own experience - after all of that trial and error and effort on DBs side - they failed to advise on what would seem to be a simple solution. That could have easily been outlined in whatever build documentation is included with these bikes.

At what point is it not the manufacturers responsibility to ensure the shops they're selling into have the adequate knowledge to service the end consumer?

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wsrobert wrote:
... after all of that trial and error and effort on DBs side - they failed to advise on what would seem to be a simple solution. That could have easily been outlined in whatever build documentation is included with these bikes.



At what point is it not the manufacturers responsibility to ensure the shops they're selling into have the adequate knowledge to service the end consumer?

The way I read it, DB didn't know the solution until they had his bike back in their hands, so they didn't fail to advise.

And, they didn't sell the bike into that shop, kiley bought the bike online, and took it to a mechanic of his choice. Nothing wrong with that, but DB can't personally train every mechanic in the world.

Of course, DB dropped the ball on the refund, and while that created a major pain in the ass for Kiley, he had the paypal protection.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [tri-run] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
i have the same length stem that kiley had. i ride steep. i'm heavier than he is. i ride on shitty roads like he does. i don't have his problem. i'm not suggesting any causation, i just don't know how exactly DB is supposed to continue to chase this, unless you're suggesting building a dedicated testing machine that doesn't currently exist for a single model of bike.

let me tell you how things really worked in the bike making business when i was a bike maker. you engineer the bike. you build the bike. you test the bike on testing machines. you follow all CPSC and CE protocols. you put this bike underneath product testers. then you put it underneath your pro and pro team riders. now, after the thing has been ridden by 40 or so people you put it out there for sale.

and then you wait to find out what's wrong with your bike.

because consumers are going to do things you couldn't possibly believe they'd do, likewise bike mechanics working on stores, and the large number of consumers give you a second, more expansive test of validation because of the sheer numbers.

i can't speak for DB. however, after having given the problem a comprehensive world class noodling if i just couldn't figure out what caused the problem i'd look very hard to see if there's a second instance. if i couldn't find a second instance at some point i'd just add it to the list of mysteries of the universe.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wsrobert wrote:
That was quite a lot to write - when detailing that you're simply pro manufacturer would suffice. With seeming no ability to feign objectivity. Or attempt to understand how consumers could be sold bikes, that are now exceedingly complicated and surpass the level of knowledge and expertise available at their local LBS. And in those situations, its the consumers fault. In your opinion at least. In Kileys own experience - after all of that trial and error and effort on DBs side - they failed to advise on what would seem to be a simple solution. That could have easily been outlined in whatever build documentation is included with these bikes.

At what point is it not the manufacturers responsibility to ensure the shops they're selling into have the adequate knowledge to service the end consumer?

In this case, that's a very difficult question to answer because Diamondback doesn't sell into any shops. They are 100% consumer direct. The bikes come fully built and - in particular with the Andean - this is why they desire to know your fit coordinates, because the bike is hard to work on, so they want to ship the bike as close as they can in a "ready-to-ride" way. This is much easier with mountain bikes - I was set up happily enough on the trail bike DB sent me after about 15min of wrenching. Harder with road bikes. And really hard with tri bikes.

The question you pose will be an ongoing challenge for Diamondback, Canyon (once they start shipping), HIA, and others. Someone like Trek who is selling direct but still maintains a dealer network has a leg up here... if you happen to live close to a good Trek dealer.

So there are, I think, quite different answers to your question depending on whether you are asking it specifically about this incident or about bike-dealer relationships more generally.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [tri-run] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Honestly, I'm wondering if there was a faulty headset bearing that leaked onto the fork upon insertion. If I was building a bike, I'd clean the fork before inserting it, and then when you put it in it gets contaminated. I could foresee a series of events where a one off bad bearing causes this through no fault of the manufacturer or builder. Note they specifically said it was bearing lube that causes the problem.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [imswimmer328] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
imswimmer328 wrote:
Honestly, I'm wondering if there was a faulty headset bearing that leaked onto the fork upon insertion. If I was building a bike, I'd clean the fork before inserting it, and then when you put it in it gets contaminated. I could foresee a series of events where a one off bad bearing causes this through no fault of the manufacturer or builder. Note they specifically said it was bearing lube that causes the problem.

I was wondering the same and wondered why no one else asked - was it lube that the mechanic applied during the build, or did something come out of one of the bearings?
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [SBRcanuck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SBRcanuck wrote:
wsrobert wrote:
... after all of that trial and error and effort on DBs side - they failed to advise on what would seem to be a simple solution. That could have easily been outlined in whatever build documentation is included with these bikes.



At what point is it not the manufacturers responsibility to ensure the shops they're selling into have the adequate knowledge to service the end consumer?


The way I read it, DB didn't know the solution until they had his bike back in their hands, so they didn't fail to advise.

And, they didn't sell the bike into that shop, kiley bought the bike online, and took it to a mechanic of his choice. Nothing wrong with that, but DB can't personally train every mechanic in the world.

Of course, DB dropped the ball on the refund, and while that created a major pain in the ass for Kiley, he had the paypal protection.

DB has chosen a direct to consumer model. Here is one consequence of that model. As you mention, they cannot train every mech. But these are the issues they'll face following this model.

And when those issues arise, their CS better be well buttoned up. And it was, until it wasnt - and then it really wasnt. Which was the point of this entire thread. The shitty customer service. Personally I do not see how Kiley could have been anymore clear that this was uniquely his experience with the bike and the point of the thread was simply DBs inability to stand behind their promises. Many people could not only have great experiences with the bike, but also great experiences with DBs CS. Just as Dan has.

None of this seems that complicated.

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
i have the same length stem that kiley had. i ride steep. i'm heavier than he is. i ride on shitty roads like he does. i don't have his problem. i'm not suggesting any causation, i just don't know how exactly DB is supposed to continue to chase this, unless you're suggesting building a dedicated testing machine that doesn't currently exist for a single model of bike.

let me tell you how things really worked in the bike making business when i was a bike maker. you engineer the bike. you build the bike. you test the bike on testing machines. you follow all CPSC and CE protocols. you put this bike underneath product testers. then you put it underneath your pro and pro team riders. now, after the thing has been ridden by 40 or so people you put it out there for sale.

and then you wait to find out what's wrong with your bike.

because consumers are going to do things you couldn't possibly believe they'd do, likewise bike mechanics working on stores, and the large number of consumers give you a second, more expansive test of validation because of the sheer numbers.

i can't speak for DB. however, after having given the problem a comprehensive world class noodling if i just couldn't figure out what caused the problem i'd look very hard to see if there's a second instance. if i couldn't find a second instance at some point i'd just add it to the list of mysteries of the universe.

Lots more words - but yet you still fail to see or admit the only driver of this post. Which rests solely on DBs inability to follow through on their promise of a refund. DB was fantastic it would seem up to that point - trying to ensure that this got sorted for a customer who wanted it sorted. Personally after fork number 2, I'm asking for a refund. I dont have the time or patience. But much more was done on both sides from that regard.

But NONE of those bike issues matter. DB promised a refund and didnt follow through. What are we still talking about?

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wsrobert wrote:
detailing that you're simply pro manufacturer would suffice. With seeming no ability to feign objectivity.

when i saw you replied to my post i pretty much knew the tenor of the reply before reading it. on this and on every issue, one way to parse between two disparate outlooks is slowman's view versus wsrobert's view. you are of course free to believe and relay your opinion, so that readers can clearly see where your compass needle points, versus mine.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Rappstar wrote:
Someone like Trek who is selling direct but still maintains a dealer network has a leg up here.

did you see the other thread on this very topic of a trek consumer direct purchase? so much for trek's leg up ;-)

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:

and then you wait to find out what's wrong with your bike.

because consumers are going to do things you couldn't possibly believe they'd do, likewise bike mechanics working on stores, and the large number of consumers give you a second, more expansive test of validation because of the sheer numbers.

I think this is part of it, in regards to DB. While the custom stem / HED Corsair combination on the Serios and Andean looks pretty slick, many users, such as myself, looked to aftermarket bars to meet their specific needs. It's fairly obvious, this stem was only made to work with the Corsair bars, and anything else required some 'tinkering.' And, from what I've read here, that seems to be fairly common. I know this is veering away from the customer service aspect, but I believe this stem/bars design could be more flexible for users that will want to or need to switch out front end components.

Oh, and my experience with DB customer service has been nothing but positive.

--------------------------------------------
TEAM F3 Undurance
Last edited by: Rappstar: Sep 15, 17 10:21
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Watching your posts it seems like you do want to make balanced and thoughtful posts based on your actual experiences. And that's all a reasonable reader can ask for IMHO.

I would ask if you think the level of customer service YOU receive is representative of what an average consumer receives. It would take a very dumb company not to go above and beyond for you. Additionally, it is not uncommon that new products going to influential people are more carefully "sorted" than the average consumer. As one of your examples was somewhat discordant from what I had seen for IRL consumers in my area, I just want to point out that as the commercials note "Your mileage may vary" when it comes to some of these companies and the customer service or product quality.

But then again, so might mine. I have a built in positive bias toward Trek and Bontrager products, but how much of that is based on an awesome LBS, great warranty support and products which match my personal preference. Even with Zipp/HED, when I have a product go wrong I find myself making greater much greater allowances than with other manufacturers. I guess we all are the sum of the products we actually get to use, but given your well earned status in the industry I may posit that yours may be a bit more curated by the manufacturers.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
That's what I've gathered online as well. I just haven't heard anything official from a trek dealer or someone who has recently tried to order a 2018 bike. And since Carl isn't there anymore, we can't ask him either.

Carl is no longer with Trek?? Anyone know where is he working by chance? Carl was a breathe of fresh air as far as I am concerned.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Multisportsdad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Multisportsdad wrote:
I know this is veering away from the customer service aspect, but I believe this stem/bars design could be more flexible for users that will want to or need to switch out front end components. Oh, and my experience with DB customer service has been nothing but positive.

ah, well, you bring up what is the most salient complication with this bike. have you looked at the pics i've taken of the andean? that i built in my workshop? have you noted that the bars on it are not the bars that come with this bike?

i love me some andean. but only with the PD bars on that bike or with other similar bars that pedestal. however, you need their stem on the bike (for optimal performance) because it has bosses that accept their front storage that fairs their rear storage. conundrum! so i did some modifying. as jeroen did on his andean.

this bike goes from a good bike to a great bike as new front end options come on line. i'll go into greater detail on this in my own reviews that i'll write on this bike.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Thomas Gerlach] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
stevej wrote:
That's what I've gathered online as well. I just haven't heard anything official from a trek dealer or someone who has recently tried to order a 2018 bike. And since Carl isn't there anymore, we can't ask him either.


Carl is no longer with Trek?? Anyone know where is he working by chance? Carl was a breathe of fresh air as far as I am concerned.

carl left trek some months ago. i'm keeping an eye on him. stalking him you might say. imho carl was a resource trek did not fully understand, and trek's SC sales may suffer because of carl's absence. the bike is unchanged - still a great bike. but the support has changed (because the support system that is carl is no longer there). trek made a blunder by having carl's absence remain unfilled, and other enterprising bike companies could do well by noting that this means a free agent is unsigned.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [AKCrafty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
AKCrafty wrote:
When are we going to talk about Speed Concepts again?

Hopefully soon.

Pink? Maybe. Maybe not. You decide.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [elf6c] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
elf6c wrote:
I would ask if you think the level of customer service YOU receive is representative of what an average consumer receives.

shite no. you'd better treat me like a damned god if you're a bike company! (tho not really because i'm very unlikely to take that out on you publicly if you don't, because i understand that every customer service issue is individual and companies screw up just as i did when i was a bike maker.)

and that's why i really don't think i wrote in this thread, "my customer service experience with DB has been stellar! i don't know what kiley's talking about!" i think it would be unfair and unrealistic for me to write that.

so i've kept my comments (i think) to the performance of the bike. yes, i know a lot of things about all the bike companies you all don't know. i know which bike companies have had customer relations challenges because of acquisitions, trade show and travel, staff leaving, new untrained staff coming in, and so when i see comments on the forum i know exactly why a snafu happened at an otherwise great company, but what am i going to say?

the truly enterprising reader, upon not getting satisfaction, sometimes just PMs me. sometimes i can help. sometimes i can't. it just depends what that reader wants, and sometimes it's more satisfying to publicly flay the company than to get the problem solved.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
yes, I noticed your mods to the stem. I'm also using PD bars for likely the same reason. I'm now using their Version 2.0 stem (what I call it) with the nose that is held on with magnets. It seems to be a better design than 1.0, but I'm not wild about the Di2 cables that come out the bottom.

--------------------------------------------
TEAM F3 Undurance
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
wsrobert wrote:
detailing that you're simply pro manufacturer would suffice. With seeming no ability to feign objectivity.


when i saw you replied to my post i pretty much knew the tenor of the reply before reading it. on this and on every issue, one way to parse between two disparate outlooks is slowman's view versus wsrobert's view. you are of course free to believe and relay your opinion, so that readers can clearly see where your compass needle points, versus mine.

And I'm happy you continue to allow it.

I'm just the counter to what I often believe is an imbalanced opinion - by being imbalanced myself, in the opposite direction. But I guess thats the thing - often these dialogues are just a collection of opinions. Someone said above that we're all smart enough to draw our own conclusions based on the dialogue presented. Probably just good for us all to remember that.

Not that it matters, but I'd still ride a DB. Probably.

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
1) i do not think DB knew based on what was written so how could they have included it

2) not sure dan was unobjective. I think his point was its easy to throw companies under buses undeservedly online

3) the real FU here is DB's customer service. I am not sure that they did anything else as they did not know it was a problem
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
stevej wrote:
That's what I've gathered online as well. I just haven't heard anything official from a trek dealer or someone who has recently tried to order a 2018 bike. And since Carl isn't there anymore, we can't ask him either.


Carl is no longer with Trek?? Anyone know where is he working by chance? Carl was a breathe of fresh air as far as I am concerned.


carl left trek some months ago. i'm keeping an eye on him. stalking him you might say. imho carl was a resource trek did not fully understand, and trek's SC sales may suffer because of carl's absence. the bike is unchanged - still a great bike. but the support has changed (because the support system that is carl is no longer there). trek made a blunder by having carl's absence remain unfilled, and other enterprising bike companies could do well by noting that this means a free agent is unsigned.

I have ridden a Trek bike for as long as I can remember. I have and continue to like their bikes and believe in them, but sometimes I wonder if they really understand what is and isn't valuable internally from a marketing/sales/cs perspective. Maybe the company is just getting too big.

There is no doubt in my mind that Carl was a valuable resource to the ST community as he answered thousands of questions to potential buyers in the dawn of Superbikes. I have no idea if that was part of Carl's actual responsibility (as an engineer of the bike), and if not, whether those above even grasped what he did. I have noticed that certain positions there are very short-lived. Maybe people aren't in positions long enough to really truly understand what is working and what isn't. Regardless that is a huge loss for Trek. As far as I am concerned you can find another marketing/sales/cs person, but you can't just find another Carl.

Fwiw, as I mentioned in another thread. My own casual observation of a trip Tim Reed/Holly Lawrence took to Trek this summer seemed rather illogical in regards to some activities they were asked to do. I was not at all surprised by the result at Worlds. It was clear whoever is in charge of activating their sponsorship doesn't really understand how much time and effort is required to be a World Champion in triathlon. I get that you want to get some value out of the athletes but the way they did it was invaluable in the first place which means you are just wasting their time.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Thomas Gerlach] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
My own casual observation of a trip Tim Reed/Holly Lawrence took to Trek this summer seemed rather illogical in regards to some activities they were asked to do. I was not at all surprised by the result at Worlds. It was clear whoever is in charge of activating their sponsorship doesn't really understand how much time and effort is required to be a World Champion in triathlon.

i don't have any insight on that worthy of a comment, i'll just note that one thing kiley and i agree on is that holly's seat's too high. i love the rest of her position. but her seat could come down at least a cm and she would benefit.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [japarker24] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
japarker24 wrote:
AKCrafty wrote:
When are we going to talk about Speed Concepts again?


Hopefully soon.

Happened sooner than I thought!
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [rhayden] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rhayden wrote:
Kilyay is going to talk to DB and straighten things out. DB acknowledged there was an issue and are fixing it...mistakes happen. people get wound up. reasonable people move on.

I spoke with Steve from Diamondback earlier today and we have reached a detente. Diamondback offered to cover the service costs I incurred, which assuages a lot of the financial pain on my end.

As for the PayPal and refund process, it sounds like there was an internal breakdown in communication where the people with the power to redress weren't aware or made aware of the situation. It's obviously not an excuse, but this kind of thing happens at large companies -- anyone who has worked in a marketing function at a billion dollar company can attest to that -- but of course it's also the kind of thing that direct-to-consumer bike purveyors like Canyon and DB have to master over time if they are going to be successful.

In terms of the product issue, it does sound like this was a new thing for them, and learning of this problem may be a blessing in disguise going forward. Not that it matters, but I still think that a two bolt stem and/or a stem without such heft would have alleviated the problem -- maybe they agree, maybe they don't, but I think there is surely room for improvement in the design of that front end. That bolt occlusion alone...

All things considered, it sounds like there have been relatively few issues with the bike across the population served. The consistent complaint seems to be the PF bottom bracket nightmare, which I experienced and Jeroen experienced. But considering how ambitious this bike is and was, maybe not so bad.

I'm glad I started this thread, and I'm glad we hashed this out. It may be easy to throw a company under the bus undeservedly online, but strict compliance with the code of slowmerta isn't a solution either. Because the reality is it's really tough, as an end consumer buying niche products in a small market, to make purchase decisions without any information, positive or negative, from another end consumer. I had a good dialogue with rappstar about this topic earlier this year:

kileyay wrote:
Rappstar wrote:
If I try something and I hate it, is the better outcome for all involved not to simply say directly to them, "hey, this didn't work for me for X, Y, and Z reasons. Maybe consider changing those things?" What good comes out of publicly exposing those flaws?


Really? How about the good being that your readers don't go spend money on terrible shit that sucks?

I think you of all people can choose and use your words well enough to separate criticisms that are personal vs. those that are likely applicable to your audience. And we are smart enough to differentiate between the two ourselves. You think we don't understand that saddles are personal?

It really burns me up when I go out and buy something based on a one-sided review or recommendation -- typically from a friend who is so encumbered by post-purchase confirmation bias they are incapable of admitting to a product's flaws -- only to find a failure point that makes the thing a deal breaker for me. And if someone had only mentioned that potential downside...

On a related note...I smashed up my helmet last weekend in an accident and have been shopping for a new one all week. I read your Scott review and it was so incredibly over the top positive I couldn't bring myself to order that helmet. That review was just too gushing. I picked up three others to test out instead. I guess we just have radically different views on what constitutes an effective and credible product review. And your view is wrong.

I stand by that.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
but strict compliance with the code of slowmerta isn't a solution either.

perhaps you could explain to me how this code works. given this very thread. and given that you pretty much write what you want here. and given the threads on felt now ongoing.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
but strict compliance with the code of slowmerta isn't a solution either.


perhaps you could explain to me how this code works. given this very thread. and given that you pretty much write what you want here. and given the threads on felt now ongoing.

I bite my tongue for this entire thread and you can't let me get in one small jest at the very end? It was a jest, not a jab.

<3
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Slowman wrote:
kileyay wrote:
but strict compliance with the code of slowmerta isn't a solution either.


perhaps you could explain to me how this code works. given this very thread. and given that you pretty much write what you want here. and given the threads on felt now ongoing.


I bite my tongue for this entire thread and you can't let me get in one small jest at the very end? It was a jest, not a jab. <3

ah. well. the irony was lost on me. sorry. i know it ruins it if you have to explain the joke.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [BryanD] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
because no one on this godforsaken website knows how to use the quote feature. Dev Paul, who's been on here since dinosaurs roamed the earth still puts his reply inside the quote half the damn time.
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JustinPB] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JustinPB wrote:
because no one on this godforsaken website knows how to use the quote feature. Dev Paul, who's been on here since dinosaurs roamed the earth still puts his reply inside the quote half the damn time.

Hahaha. Gold
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Maybe direct to consumer isnt the right model for bikes that rival the space shuttle in complexity? Or at least not the model that exists today.

You mention DB asks for Pad X-Y to ensure its built as close to those numbers as possible upon arrival. But people travel with their bikes. They swap out parts. Thats not really a solution.

Maybe it'll take the industry going from one end of the spectrum (B&M) to the other (online) - failing - and then back to a completely rethought version of the OG model. Or some more successful hybrid of the two.

"One Line Robert"
Last edited by: wsrobert: Sep 15, 17 13:10
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Thomas Gerlach] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
Slowman wrote:
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
stevej wrote:
That's what I've gathered online as well. I just haven't heard anything official from a trek dealer or someone who has recently tried to order a 2018 bike. And since Carl isn't there anymore, we can't ask him either.


Carl is no longer with Trek?? Anyone know where is he working by chance? Carl was a breathe of fresh air as far as I am concerned.


carl left trek some months ago. i'm keeping an eye on him. stalking him you might say. imho carl was a resource trek did not fully understand, and trek's SC sales may suffer because of carl's absence. the bike is unchanged - still a great bike. but the support has changed (because the support system that is carl is no longer there). trek made a blunder by having carl's absence remain unfilled, and other enterprising bike companies could do well by noting that this means a free agent is unsigned.

I have ridden a Trek bike for as long as I can remember. I have and continue to like their bikes and believe in them, but sometimes I wonder if they really understand what is and isn't valuable internally from a marketing/sales/cs perspective. Maybe the company is just getting too big.

There is no doubt in my mind that Carl was a valuable resource to the ST community as he answered thousands of questions to potential buyers in the dawn of Superbikes. I have no idea if that was part of Carl's actual responsibility (as an engineer of the bike), and if not, whether those above even grasped what he did. I have noticed that certain positions there are very short-lived. Maybe people aren't in positions long enough to really truly understand what is working and what isn't. Regardless that is a huge loss for Trek. As far as I am concerned you can find another marketing/sales/cs person, but you can't just find another Carl.

Fwiw, as I mentioned in another thread. My own casual observation of a trip Tim Reed/Holly Lawrence took to Trek this summer seemed rather illogical in regards to some activities they were asked to do. I was not at all surprised by the result at Worlds. It was clear whoever is in charge of activating their sponsorship doesn't really understand how much time and effort is required to be a World Champion in triathlon. I get that you want to get some value out of the athletes but the way they did it was invaluable in the first place which means you are just wasting their time.

I'm just glad he was still there to give my daughter and me a "personal" factory tour last March. We showed up for the normal public tour hours, and I had mentioned to Carl in an PM that we were coming and I just wanted to say "Hi". Carl met us in the lobby and tagged along on the tour, adding additional insights that even the regular tour guide didn't know. It was pretty cool having the tour guide ask Carl questions about some of the equipment and products. One thing not generally known here is that Carl started at Trek as a manufacturing engineer before getting into product design, so he not only designed some of the bikes, but also designed (and installed) a lot of equipment used to MAKE the bikes.

Thanks again Carl!

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wsrobert wrote:
Maybe direct to consumer isnt the right model for bikes that rival the space shuttle in complexity? Or at least not the model that exists today.

You mention DB asks for Pad X-Y to ensure its built as close to those numbers as possible upon arrival. But people travel with their bikes. They swap out parts. Thats not really a solution.

Maybe it'll take the industry going from one end of the spectrum (B&M) to the other (online) - failing - and then back to a completely rethought version of the OG model. Or some more successful hybrid of the two.

spot on! altho i don't think there is anything wrong with techie products being sold consumer direct. to me, the andean is a moonshot. whether it's consumer direct or thru an IBD anybody who is an early adopter is going to have to expect the attendant issue. people here forget what it was like to be a speed concept early adopter in 2011.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A. wrote:
One thing not generally known here is that Carl started at Trek as a manufacturing engineer before getting into product design, so he not only designed some of the bikes, but also designed (and installed) a lot of equipment used to MAKE the bikes.

Thanks again Carl!

I regularly chide(d) Dan for overstating my role/impact/whatever...so I'm not going to let you off the hook either. I was the ME for only one of several mfg departments involved in making the bikes.

And you're still very welcome :-) It was great to meet you.

Carl Matson
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [Pun_Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Here are some pics I snapped today:

Junction mounted to the rail:


"Invisible" to the wind:

Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [davews09] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Gotcha. I see the box is off to the side enough that it doesn't get in the way of the cage

Matt
Quote Reply
Re: Caveat emptor with Diamondback: Andean purchase experience worst ever in my tri/cycling consumerism history [JustinPB] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JustinPB wrote:
because no one on this godforsaken website knows how to use the quote feature. Dev Paul, who's been on here since dinosaurs roamed the earth still puts his reply inside the quote half the damn time.

I'm glad I'm not the only one that is often irked over people screwing up the very basic and easy use of the quote function.

You hit the button and start typing below it. It's not rocket surgery. One basically needs to go out of their way to actually do it incorrectly.

Favorite Gear: Dimond | Cadex | Desoto Sport | Hoka One One
Quote Reply