Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Tubular - what am I missing? [Rocket_racing]
Rocket_racing wrote:


Um... this is 2010 data. A lot has changed since the days of horse and buggy.


What hasn't changed since 2010 is physics. And a Crr of 0.0022 is FAF. The closest clincher is the CS, which tested at 0.00231 (according to BRR @ 120PSI).

If you see one, you wouldn't question them being faster. They're like condoms with a layer of tread painted on. Super fragile. As I mentioned above, I wouldn't use them off wood. It seems unlikely they'd survive even a single brake lock-up or skid.
Last edited by: trail: Feb 23, 19 13:49

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by trail (Dawson Saddle) on Feb 23, 19 13:49