Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Cervelo P2 vs BMC TM02 [ballisticpb]
ballisticpb wrote:
I've done a bunch of lurking and reading on this forum and I understand that fit is everything and the better bike will be the one that fits best.


Like a lot of bogus statements that are often repeated... ;)

Fit is important, but there is a huge range of adjustment if you get a bike that is highly adjustable. Which bikes are you actually comparing? Links?

EDIT: I was wondering because when I looked up TM02 on the BMC site it had Ultegra and was more expensive. So:

https://www.racycles.com/product/detail/12543
https://www.cervelo.com/...riathlon/p-series/p2

I wouldn't necessarily say the P2 is more aero. The P2 has a more expensive pad/extension clamp, but unfortunately it limits adjustability. The BMC has the bar with independent pad clamps which is a plus IMO. I like the M-long of the BMC if you are 6' or so. It's long-low for modern tri bike, and you can get a riser kit for the bars if you want more height.
Last edited by: rruff: Jun 12, 18 17:59

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by rruff (Dawson Saddle) on Jun 12, 18 17:59