Andrewmc wrote:
There seems to be extensive virtue signalling, moral relativism and some cognitive dissonance knocking around here Apparently a clothing line from a doper is an outrage. Workouts scribed by a sexual predator are ok.........
I am going to have to seriously think this shit through.
Would I rather my daughter's wore a dopers clothes or be coached by Sutton..........
Edit. Cue the responses citing revisionist history, his mea culpa, how there is no moral equivalence blah blah blah
If I choose to exercise my right to be coached by Sutton i would also choose to keep my mouth shut about others exercising poor judgement
Bravo. Couldn't agree more. Moral relativism puzzles can be tough. But, in this case, not so much. If we're going to have a conversation about offences worthy of lifetime bans from the sport, crimes of pedophilia against young athletes placed in your care seem like a really good place to start.
Alan Couzens, M.Sc. (Sports Science)
Exercise Physiologist/Coach
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Alan_Couzens
Web: https://alancouzens.com
Last edited by:
Alan Couzens: May 31, 18 6:06