stevej wrote:
How are you seeing cadence from the GSC-10 and quarq? Are you using two computers that are paired to each independently?Yep, exactly. I had the Quarq paired to my Edge computer displaying power & cadence and then paired just the GSC-10 to my fenix 3 to compare the values. Held the two side-by-side and could see in real-time that whilst holding a fairly consistent spin, the GSC-10 was fluctuating +/- 1 rpm, whilst the Quarq was more like +/- 4 or 5 rpm.
I did this on a few occasions whilst troubleshooting it, but this is what convinced me that it was the Quarq's cadence values that were noisy and not just my inability to hold a constant spin! I appreciate that the two sensors might smooth their reported values to different degrees, but the fact that the Quarq managed to fix itself suggests something else.
stevej wrote:
I'm pretty sure the quarq d-zero still supports the cadence magnet.You might be right on that, I vaguely recall reading somewhere that it wasn't but I could be wrong; it's not something I've looked into because it's not a route I think I need to go down at the moment.