I PM'd you with the link to this topic, not sure how that is misconstrued as trolling............ But your statement was that (in case you missed the quotation) was that the evade wasn't cheap or fast...........do I need to link up your quote again?
And they would be wrong. I published my findings on that helmet last september. 5w slower than the McLaren, which is pretty amazing.
hardly cheap or fast. pretty much ultimate fail.
1. Stop PMing stupid comments, troll.
2. The McLaren is 5w faster than the Evade.
3. The Giro A2 often tests faster than the McLaren.
"I would definitely smell her seat after a century ride"
Nick_Barkley wrote:
shivermetimbers wrote:
Rappstar wrote:
shivermetimbers wrote:
any tunnel data on the evade? There are several twitchers in here who don't think it's aero.............And they would be wrong. I published my findings on that helmet last september. 5w slower than the McLaren, which is pretty amazing.
Nick_Barkley wrote:
shivermetimbers wrote:
/Evadehardly cheap or fast. pretty much ultimate fail.
1. Stop PMing stupid comments, troll.
2. The McLaren is 5w faster than the Evade.
3. The Giro A2 often tests faster than the McLaren.
"I would definitely smell her seat after a century ride"
Rappstar wrote:
That might be the post of the year right there.
Last edited by:
shivermetimbers: Jun 12, 14 9:21