Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Hal Higdon's training plans, are they wrong?? [sabot]
A lot of the 'beginner' marathon plans are designed to just get the athlete to the finish. So basically you do some running during the week, then a crazy ass long run on the weekend that probably takes a beginner runner up to 3+ hours to do.


This is pretty contradictory to standard distance running training. Conventional wisdom has the long run usually equal to 20-25% of the weekly mileage. So your typical distance runner may be hitting 15-20 miles on their long run. If you're putting in solid mileage the rest of the week, a 2 hr long run every week (some weeks slow, some weeks fast, some weeks progression) is as long as you need to go. I don't know any runners who go longer than 2:30. If the rest of your training is at an appropriate volume, the long run is really just the icing on the cake. It's the foundation (cake) you really need to worry about. Icing by itself is pretty gross.

So in a sense, yes it's 'wrong' from an ideal training standpoint, but since very few people are doing the mileage necessary to really prepare for a marathon, it may be acceptable or appropriate for a person's needs/background/fitness/goals.


Also.... isn't that race this weekend???????

___________________
Twitter | Kancman | Blog
Last edited by: snackchair: Sep 9, 11 7:00

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by snackchair (Dawson Saddle) on Sep 9, 11 7:00