Nope. Those are for "naked" wheels with the "best" yaw data I could find at the time (which was over a year ago.) You should de-rate any time savings by...oh, say...50% for a rear wheel.
My sim has many flaws. I never intended to publish any results. I just built it to guide my race wheel purchase decisions last season -- which is why it's all tuned to a 21.5 MPH baseline. (I ended up with a Jet 60 C2 front and Jet Disk rear.)
What is really startling is how small the differences are among the various aero wheels (with a disk being the big standout). The non-disk differences are, IMO, so small that they are lost in the noise of external factors and simulation limitations.
EDIT: The sim is really a line integral around an ideal flat circular course at constant power and under constant wind velocity vector. I was curious what kind of yaw angles I would really experience at different wind speeds, given my baseline speed and power. (Yes, in any crowd other than ST, my engineering geekiness would be subject to much ridicule.) ;)
"100% of the people who confuse correlation and causation end up dying."