Jctriguy wrote:
lightheir wrote:
Watown wrote:
I haven't read the whole thread, but the idea that a 4:45 mile is fast for a high-school kid is ridiculous. Last spring alone, there were 8,459 different high-school kids that ran 4:45 or better in the 1600 in the United States. It simply is not that rare to run into someone that ran sub 4:45 in high-school.
http://www.athletic.net/...ender=M&Event=52 For the umpteenth time, see threads above of why this thread is NOT a post about '4:45 is fast for a high school runner'.
If you're one of the many who feel compelled to repeat '4:45 is not fast for a high school runner', find a different thread to chest-thump on - it's really old already and off-topic!
Sorry, but your first post was definitely about 4:45 being a crazy fast time that very few people could accomplish. Fact is that a large number of high school runners can run sub 4:45. You don't need to know anything about training techniques to run that fast as a 17yr old, you just need some talent and a group of guys that worked hard.
My question is how did you know their age was exactly 35-42?
Kindergarten event. I can tell just from looking that that's the age of the men there.
And again, for the umpteenth time, re-read my original post. Where did I say that 4:45/mi was an crazy fast x-country time?
The point of the post was that for 5 RANDOM GUYS who clearly had LITTLE CLUE ABOUT RUNNING during the conversation, 4:45/mi in HS was highly, highly, unlikely. Which I completely stand by.