lutzman wrote:
Hey, no argument on personal responsibility.
Running out of water on the bike course is total BS. Ditto running out of ice on the run. It's not like anyone was surprised by the heat. WTC just basically went cheapo and tried to save money on ice and water at the expense of athletes on a very difficult day. You can beat up the OP all you want...his decisions hurt only him. WTC's decisions potentially hurt every athlete on the course.
So at what point is there "enough?" How do they judge how much to get? Do you ask that they send out a survey and ask competitors "approximately how many bottles of water do you think you'll take in the increased heat?" or "how many times do you think you'll apply ice?"
I agree that they should be prepared, but at a certain point, human behavior is unpredictable. They didn't run out of water on the bike course. OP states that they didn't have water at one aid station. Did the OP notice the aid station after that? Or the van that was mentioned a bit above? Were the volunteers just reloading their water and didn't have one for his blazing fast bike? We don't know. He experienced something that has not been well confirmed as being present on the whole course. He then cites this as being extremely unprepared. There is no evidence for that, and absolutely no evidence for your claim of WTC going "cheapo."
IM is all about personal responsibility. OP made a number of decisions (no wet suit, rented road bike v. tri bike) that made his race harder than it needed to be. He also made decisions to put himself in a potentially hazardous health situation. He then cites his lack of decision-making prowess as a reason to call out WTC.
OP, it tells you something that 22% of the field DNFd (according to your numbers). They were the smart racers. Sorry you didn't make decisions to support a smart race.