If you fit on a speed concept that would be my choice. If I remember correctly the BMCs are not particularly good in a cross wind. Trek, Cervelo and Canyon pretty much seem to have an edge over everyone else, but the Canyon isn't available here and seems to have some limited fit options.

Canada has lots of P2...... Ottawa, Toronto and Montréal I know for a fact.....

Prob between a M and L on speed concept and could make the M work, but just looking to buy a frame based on optimum fit. Boardman TT air would be another option, but would have to drive 6hrs just to see one and have not seen any wind tunnel data on it.

Might have to make the drive up with a stop at Cheetah's in Windsor on the way.

Surprised no TM01 owners have chimed in with their impression of the bike.

Run a BMC TM01 in Med-Long.
Handles well, while shopping I test-rode a 1st gen Speed Concept and it didn't come close. Haven't been on a Shiv to compare.
Flexibility of fit with the stem set-up is amazing, incremental gains are very easy to achieve without any recabling or additional purchases.
Aero-wise there's the comparison charts from that german magazine floating around somewhere that showed a wide variety of bikes, without riders. From memory, the TM01 came out behind some of the competition, by approximately a bee's dick depending on where in the yaw angles it was. Improved fit would be more than enough to offset that. The stock base bar that was used in the comparison I think was fairly average, so that may also come into your consideration.
And I haven't had any issues with wind when running appropriate depth rims.

Glad to hear some positive feedback. I decided to go ahead with the TM01 build in the M-L. Should be set up and dialed in by the end of next week. Will post a pic when its finished.

I own both bikes. To me, the Time Machine feels like it wants to go in a straight line a lot more than the Shiv, climbs better, and accelerates better. The shiv handles much better, stops better (I have the Magura brakes, which I adore) and feels like it has less flex when you are pedaling hard. It feels slightly less stable on fast descents, but that could be my selection of bars as much as anything else. I think the Shiv moves around less in crosswinds, which confounds me. The Shiv is easier to travel with and service (those were the things that made me get it). They are both really fast bikes. My fit on both is identical, probably a little easier to do on the Shiv.

Interested. I have a Shiv. However, I have always had bike envy of the BMC TM. I have heard that the BMC bikes are more temperamental than others....sounds like this is the case. Given my lack of mechanical skills, sounds like the BMC would not be the way to go!

I am not the most mechanically gifted person out there and own a TM01. The only challenge I have ever had with it is the rear brake that may require removing the crank to adjust, but not for all adjustments. My racing and training wheels are same width, same pad type so this is a non issue for me.

Other than that, I can take it apart for travel in less than 5 minutes. My bag requires cockpit, seat, pedal and derailleur removal.

With the right set of tools (mostly a small torque wrench) it's pretty easy.

I would not say the TM01 is temperamental in any way.

Agree with this. Rear brake can be a little fiddly, but I've only ever needed to take the crank off once. Recabling the bike and brakes takes a little precision and patience, but I'd have no concerns traveling with it.