I'm annoyed with the publicity that is given to age groupers who break records, prime example:
"Trent Chapman from Sydney Australia was the first age grouper home, finishing in eighth position overall in a time of 8:47:33, which is also a new course record for the 30-34 category which has stood since 1993."
Trent Chapman raced the ITU world cup series and made the world champs teams in the ealry part of this decade, he has the had the benefit of years training and racing as a Pro at the highest level of the sport. He also made sacrifices in terms of carreer and money, so its not all one way. He retires and goes into private life decides to give it a go again. Trains hard, shows up and posts 8:47 and then people bang on about how he broke the record most likely set by a guy who had a full time job and did not have the benfit of 10 plus years as an elite athelte.
Yes he is an age grouper by the rules of the sport, but he is an age grouper in name only, should he be allowed to race as an age grouper, well yes as the rules say he can, my own view, is that there needs to be a category for open male and female, for ex pros and age groupers who are age groupers in name only.
Is it fair to the people who balance work and life to have records broken and Kona slots gobbled up by ex pros who want another shot. Well yes it is in a world where you either put up or shut up, but surely the ex pro would rather be competing against a field of his peers as opposed to smashing the genuine age grouper. After all it is the age grouper who keeps this sport alive.
Maybe this is all bitterness as I can't go fast enough to get a Kona slot, once it was 10 hours, then 9;45 and now 9:30 then the ex pro comes along and takes it down to 9:15, yes he made the sacrifice that I did not (plus he had talent) but surely the creation of the open category makes sense.
"Trent Chapman from Sydney Australia was the first age grouper home, finishing in eighth position overall in a time of 8:47:33, which is also a new course record for the 30-34 category which has stood since 1993."
Trent Chapman raced the ITU world cup series and made the world champs teams in the ealry part of this decade, he has the had the benefit of years training and racing as a Pro at the highest level of the sport. He also made sacrifices in terms of carreer and money, so its not all one way. He retires and goes into private life decides to give it a go again. Trains hard, shows up and posts 8:47 and then people bang on about how he broke the record most likely set by a guy who had a full time job and did not have the benfit of 10 plus years as an elite athelte.
Yes he is an age grouper by the rules of the sport, but he is an age grouper in name only, should he be allowed to race as an age grouper, well yes as the rules say he can, my own view, is that there needs to be a category for open male and female, for ex pros and age groupers who are age groupers in name only.
Is it fair to the people who balance work and life to have records broken and Kona slots gobbled up by ex pros who want another shot. Well yes it is in a world where you either put up or shut up, but surely the ex pro would rather be competing against a field of his peers as opposed to smashing the genuine age grouper. After all it is the age grouper who keeps this sport alive.
Maybe this is all bitterness as I can't go fast enough to get a Kona slot, once it was 10 hours, then 9;45 and now 9:30 then the ex pro comes along and takes it down to 9:15, yes he made the sacrifice that I did not (plus he had talent) but surely the creation of the open category makes sense.