This past week I ran into a workout buddy in the gym. We both got there at the same time and were both doing weights that day, but we decided to get on the eliptical trainer for about 10 minutes to warm up first.
About 6-7 minutes into the warmup he tells me he's going to go light that day because his HR indicates that he hasn't recovered from the previosu day's workout. I look over, expecting to see a pretty high HR indicated on his display, but his HR is only around 103 or 104.
I asked what he meant, because it looked to me like he was fine (maybe he needed to warm up a little harder). His reply was that a low heart rate during the warmup meant that his system wasn't ready to supply the energy/oxygen/whatever that he'd need for a hard workout, so he was going to take it easy.
The reason I'm asking is that I thought the exact *opposite* was true -- that is, if your HR doesn't come up very much under a light load that means you're ready to do more work, and if your HR spikes under light load you should probably take it easy. I thought that was the reason why people wore HR monitors for several hours after a hard workout to see how quickly they recovered, and the reason we look for a *low* resting HR as an indication of fitness, not a high resting HR.
Am I wrong here? Is there anything to indicate that a lack of "responsiveness" in HR is an indication of lack of recovery? It makes sense if you think in terms of a car: when you step on the gas and it doesn't go, that's an indication something's wrong. But I diddn't think the body worked that way.
Thanks,
Lee
About 6-7 minutes into the warmup he tells me he's going to go light that day because his HR indicates that he hasn't recovered from the previosu day's workout. I look over, expecting to see a pretty high HR indicated on his display, but his HR is only around 103 or 104.
I asked what he meant, because it looked to me like he was fine (maybe he needed to warm up a little harder). His reply was that a low heart rate during the warmup meant that his system wasn't ready to supply the energy/oxygen/whatever that he'd need for a hard workout, so he was going to take it easy.
The reason I'm asking is that I thought the exact *opposite* was true -- that is, if your HR doesn't come up very much under a light load that means you're ready to do more work, and if your HR spikes under light load you should probably take it easy. I thought that was the reason why people wore HR monitors for several hours after a hard workout to see how quickly they recovered, and the reason we look for a *low* resting HR as an indication of fitness, not a high resting HR.
Am I wrong here? Is there anything to indicate that a lack of "responsiveness" in HR is an indication of lack of recovery? It makes sense if you think in terms of a car: when you step on the gas and it doesn't go, that's an indication something's wrong. But I diddn't think the body worked that way.
Thanks,
Lee