BDoughtie wrote:
No offense but seeing how you have done nothing to identify yourself in the forum, whether you think he is a risk or not a risk, does it really mean much? Now if you want to identify yourself and how you are relevant to this particular issue, then your view would atleast hold some validity. Until then not so much.
ETA: and my view means very little, but if we can have an discussion on the topic then if you are willing to say he isn't a risk without identifying how you can verify that, then it's really an non point.
Does anything all the chest thumpers say on this forum mean very much? Identified or not?
Just because I have a different point of view to the lynch mob you expect me to identify and justify myself? Why don't you ask these who would burn him at the stake for something he did 30 years ago to justify their stance? Sutton is obviously not a life long paedophile. They leave a trail in their wake. It was a one off. The group think here wont accept that, but it's the bare cold truth.
Last edited by:
avagoyamug: Jan 13, 13 13:25