monty wrote:
Now that it's been shown that woman can foot it with men I can sympathize to some extent with people who think there should be just one group in races.//
Where has that been shown? What i see is that no matter what the distance, or the event, elite women will always be behind the elite men. Don't confuse the fact that a woman beats you, or your friends, or me even, that they have somehow caught up with men in sport. As Jonnyo pointed out, there was no good men at that race of her standing in sports. Seems like no matter what the distance, you will have about a 10% gap in top performances, +/- a % or two.
I don't think you are going to get any agreement from women to merge the genders in sport either. I'm just amazed at how many of you actually believe there is some parity in performance, it is not even close... Where is it shown? In the race report of the original poster that's where. Sure, it's a one off, unless you see that it's happened a few other times. Sure they might be against weak men's field in that or those cases, but it still happened. So that's where it's shown
As I noted earlier, my mother pointed out to me that we are not all
created equally, but we all deserve to be
treated equally. To me (but not most others apparently) that means in the case of triathlon etc, we should all just race open division and let the chips fall where they may. To me also, the other option is for everyone to have a separate division so we can all feel like winners. At the moment we currently have gender and AG divisions. And of course there is the sometimes Clydesdale division also.
I have raced in races with gender and AG splits and once even raced Clydesdale. That said, I only ever look at how I finished overall. I do appreciate that others prefer to see how they did in their division. I see one open division as fair. Others see multiple divisions. Some people justify EPO or T supplementation. If we kept it simple, there would be less crying about what should constitute a division.
I do however agree that generally women are 10% behind men overall, most/all other things being equal. People with other conditions (can't think of a better term just now) can also call for a division. We have a local dwarf that rides his bike (surprisingly quickly too). Females are born females (forget the Caitlyn thing for now) and they get a division. Dwarfs are born dwarfs and they too are arguably limited in how fast they can do a tri, just like a women is essentially limited to going 90% as fast as men. Playing devils advocate, I think we should have dwarf divisions, with AG's of course, and a lighter limit for dwarf Clydesdale division, female, 40-44.
Hopefully my point hasn't been lost, but I suspect it has. Oh well, back to work, my boss is coming :-)
TriDork
"Happiness is a myth. All you can hope for is to get laid once in a while, drunk once in a while and to eat chocolate every day"