Salmon Steve wrote:
Kay Serrar wrote:
As mentioned, many will have alternative forms of income. For example, Tim Don, who was 2nd at the 70.3 World Championship, coaches:
http://www.timdon.com/coaching.html If a pro at the pinnacle of long course triathlon needs to supplement his/her income with coaching, that tells the story of how much money is(n't) in triathlon.
I think this is a little unfair on Tim (and I do realise you prob didn't intend it that way but comes across)
Tim was at the 'pinnacle' of his career at ITU, when he was the best of the best, a World Champion.
As an educated guess, the whole long course career you're referring to is an exit strategy (I actually hate that term we refer to it as transition strategy) toward life after racing, which it would seem is coaching for him. And it makes good sense for him to get involved in some long course racing for experience as that will be the majority of his clients I'd think.
I agree with your last part. But I don't think I was at all unfair on Tim. Quite the opposite. I never said he was at the pinnacle of his
career now. I said he was at the pinnacle of long course triathlon (2nd at Worlds 70.3 is pretty close to the pinnacle). I agree the pinnacle of his career was his ITU racing and winning the World Duathlon Championship in 2002 and World Triathlon Champion in 2006, but even in the 'twilight' of his career he is still at the top of the sport in long course, which is impressive! The point still stands though - which is that there is so little money in the sport that the pros must supplement their income elsewhere.
I've met Tim and he's a super guy and have enjoyed a couple of beers with him. I would certainly never say anything disrespectful towards him!