IT wrote:
If this was a forum by inactive people, we would reading about how everything that we are doing now is bad for our health.
Again there are too few draft legal races in this country to say if this is a good idea or not. Why not have some more and let the market place decide. I don't think there will be mass carnage or I would not have proposed it.
The people who consider themselves the best athletes can start in the first wave and will probably never be seen again by the rest of us. Unless they overestimated their ability.
The rest of us can choose how close to draft, pace off each other, or not draft. People who aren't comfortable drafting probably won't. Those who are comfortable drafting probably will. While there will always be a learning curve going on, and that's precisely what is needed, most people back off riding on someone's wheel that does not look promising.
Perhaps this could encourage triathletes to go on some group rides with experienced cyclists to learn the ropes before embarrassing themselves. IMHO anyone who buys a tri-bike before a road bike is asking for trouble. I don't think this will hurt the bike industry. In fact, it would probably create demand to maintain two bikes. Most people who have a tri-bike probably have their road bike too. Given what I see in these posts and the forums about what poor swimmers, cyclists, and runners we are, perhaps there is not more interest in skill development. Much of the comments have me thinking that there would be more support for fins and training wheels to accommodate the poor swimmers and cyclists amongst us. I thought the allure of racing was the challenge that develops during the race and not just how much suffering you can put yourself through. Or maybe the challenge is gizmo racing through purchases of equipment to make up for what we lack.
I think if we tried a few of these, then we would like them more than the time trial set up that we currently have. Time trials can become boring and too predictable.
Triathletes who love to ride (like myself) DO own a road bike and DO go on group rides. Still, I've only been riding for a few years and consider myself an average bike handler. The idea of doing a crit does not sound fun to me. There are a lot of triathletes like myself out there who do this for fun and recreation. In fact probably 95% or more of triathletes do this for fun and recreation without any aspirations of Olympic-level performance. That doesn't mean we don't challenge ourselves. And while I bought my road bike first there are plenty of triathletes that only have a tri bike and will only ever use it to ride lone or in a non-draft legal triathlon. Nothing wrong with that, and they certainly aren't embarrassing themselves. Many of them are really strong riders. There aren't a lot of people out there that can afford to go out and get a second competition level bike. If you suddenly change the rules and people find themselves with really expensive non-legal bikes, you can bet they'll become disenfranchised from the sport really fast.
I'm still not sure what making shorter races draft-legal would do and what the idea is trying to solve. There are plenty of draft-legal events out there.
Pete Githens
Reading, PA