Triathlon Forum
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
there is a whole website devoted to this with actual weights, not advertised
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/listings.php
Ride Scoozy Electric Bicycles
http://www.RideScoozy.com
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/listings.php
Ride Scoozy Electric Bicycles
http://www.RideScoozy.com
Re: component weight comparison chart [msuguy512]
[ In reply to ]
Yea. Been there, but they didn't have it in the format I wanted, ie: side by side easy to compare.
However, that is an excellent resource.
However, that is an excellent resource.
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Yea it is not the most organized, Feel free to keep posting more tables :)
Ride Scoozy Electric Bicycles
http://www.RideScoozy.com
Ride Scoozy Electric Bicycles
http://www.RideScoozy.com
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Could be interesting to add the price for each component and then calculate the $ per gram of weight savings between different grouppos. Could compare where $s are best spent to lighten up the ride (for example, you spend $x/gram to upgrade from Ultegra front derailleur to DA vs $y/gram to upgrade from Ultegra shifter to DA). I did a few of these calcs when I was building a bike just for shits, but I don't think I saved the spreadsheet. Problem is that price varies so much from MSRP, that you need to search out best price for every component.
Purely intellectual though because we all know that weight doesnt matter on Slowtwitch.
Purely intellectual though because we all know that weight doesnt matter on Slowtwitch.
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Unfortunately you didn't include a single group I would consider putting on my road bike :) I want to see how they compare to Record and Super-Record (though I love Campy more for the fact that they work, less for their weight).
Re: component weight comparison chart [slimfast]
[ In reply to ]
SavageHouck wrote:
I want to see how they compare to Record and Super-RecordLet's try this again. Here is a chart depicting the weight of each of the major components for the top two groups for Sram, Shimano and Campagnolo. **Rival is included for reference to where "budget" groups fall.
The next image is the pricing of each component. I grabbed most of these from Competitive Cyclist. They are all MSRP. As slimfast pointed out, you can get them much cheaper than this, but the discount by which *could* attain them is probably relatively even across the board.
And the final comparison is $/gram.
Clearly, there is no performance chart which ultimately changes everything and will truly determine what is the best group for the money.
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Can you make a 3D plot with x,y,and z being weight, price, and price/gram?
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
I'll throw my $0.02 since I happen to have bikes with Red, Force, Record and Dura Ace (yes, really).
The best groupset out there (for the money) IMHO is SRAM Force. I save my campy for the cross bike since I can rebuild it, but road race Shimano/SRAM for wheel sharing issues (PT, etc.) Or, as a lot of savy builders will do, the mismash (Red Brifters, Force deraillers/brakes, Rival Cassette, etc.)
edit: the above for road bikes of course, for a TT/Tri bike, Ultegra is the way to go
____________________________________
Fatigue is biochemical, not biomechanical.
- Andrew Coggan, PhD
The best groupset out there (for the money) IMHO is SRAM Force. I save my campy for the cross bike since I can rebuild it, but road race Shimano/SRAM for wheel sharing issues (PT, etc.) Or, as a lot of savy builders will do, the mismash (Red Brifters, Force deraillers/brakes, Rival Cassette, etc.)
edit: the above for road bikes of course, for a TT/Tri bike, Ultegra is the way to go
____________________________________
Fatigue is biochemical, not biomechanical.
- Andrew Coggan, PhD
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Good info, and helpful that you aggregated it all. This is the analysis that I was trying to explain:
(Price Delta between Group A and Group B) / (weight delta between Group A and Group B)
I ran it for DA / Ultegra using your numbers, but unfortunately I can't figure out how to post it. Performance increases aside, the most economical places to spend money to lighten the bike (in order) are: chain ($1.00/g), Shifters ($2.21/g), Front D ($3.59/g), Cassette ($4.35/g), Crank ($4.62/g), Rear D ($7.57/g), Brakes ($10.00/g). Total upgrade costs $4.34/g.
(Price Delta between Group A and Group B) / (weight delta between Group A and Group B)
I ran it for DA / Ultegra using your numbers, but unfortunately I can't figure out how to post it. Performance increases aside, the most economical places to spend money to lighten the bike (in order) are: chain ($1.00/g), Shifters ($2.21/g), Front D ($3.59/g), Cassette ($4.35/g), Crank ($4.62/g), Rear D ($7.57/g), Brakes ($10.00/g). Total upgrade costs $4.34/g.
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Re: component weight comparison chart [rroof]
[ In reply to ]
why ultegra and not force for the tri bike? I have dura ace on my P3, but i'd love to have the sram rtc shifters ...
Re: component weight comparison chart [TomNYC]
[ In reply to ]
mostly because the shifter cost so much more - they are nicer though!
____________________________________
Fatigue is biochemical, not biomechanical.
- Andrew Coggan, PhD
____________________________________
Fatigue is biochemical, not biomechanical.
- Andrew Coggan, PhD
Re: component weight comparison chart [JoeO]
[ In reply to ]
Because I'm lazy and already had Rival, so I left it in.
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Weird that the 105 chain is actually lighter than the Ultegra one.
Re: component weight comparison chart [slimfast]
[ In reply to ]
Interestingly (although maybe not surprising), the cost/gram to upgrade from one level of components to another is very similar across the board (comparing a full gruppo upgrade).
Force>Red = $4.52/g
Rival>Force = $4.34/g
Ultegra>DA = $4.34/g
More interestingly, individual component upgrades are all across the map (using crank as an example, $4.62/g to upgrade to DA from Ult, $2.97/g to upgrade from Rival to Force, and $7.42/g to upgrade from Force to Red).
I am actually not much of a weight weenie, but looking into these numbers is interesting (sort of).
Force>Red = $4.52/g
Rival>Force = $4.34/g
Ultegra>DA = $4.34/g
More interestingly, individual component upgrades are all across the map (using crank as an example, $4.62/g to upgrade to DA from Ult, $2.97/g to upgrade from Rival to Force, and $7.42/g to upgrade from Force to Red).
I am actually not much of a weight weenie, but looking into these numbers is interesting (sort of).
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
Just due to a quirk in the way the grams/dollars are spread, the Red and Record groups are actually the same cost/gram if you look at the group as a whole ($1.11/g), but noticeably different when you just add them up as you did.
-Andrew Saar
It is better to do the right thing and be paid poorly,
than to do the wrong thing and be rewarded richly.
-Andrew Saar
It is better to do the right thing and be paid poorly,
than to do the wrong thing and be rewarded richly.
Re: component weight comparison chart [AndrewSaar]
[ In reply to ]
i wanted to point this out earlier but $/gram is a useless metric.
you need to take some heavy gruppo as a standard and express the other gruppos in terms of grams *saved* per dollar
Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
you need to take some heavy gruppo as a standard and express the other gruppos in terms of grams *saved* per dollar
Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Re: component weight comparison chart [jackmott]
[ In reply to ]
That's how slimfast wanted to see it. Feel free to use the numbers and post the more useful metric!
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
it would be fun to express it in terms of seconds per hour long crit per dollar or something =)
Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
That makes SRAM Rival look pretty compelling from a weight perspective.
Tom Demerly
The Tri Shop.com
Tom Demerly
The Tri Shop.com
Re: component weight comparison chart [%FTP]
[ In reply to ]
No, it was not what I was looking for. I was interested in INCREMENTAL $/g between gruppos, which shows where the cheapest decreases in grams can be had. I may have done a poor job of explaining this in the initial post.
See my additional posts.
See my additional posts.
Re: component weight comparison chart [Tom Demerly]
[ In reply to ]
Not when you remember how utterly meaningless 100 grams really are as a determiner of performance.
Re: component weight comparison chart [JoeO]
[ In reply to ]
How about including the BB with the crank weight? It's pretty much an essential part, and my weight savings in my BB30 crank isn't in the crank alone, a lot of it is not having to use 1/4 lb bottom brackets.
<--------- Weight weenie.
That is why when I went for drivetrain for my lightweight weenie build I used Red. (Brakes, cranks and such were aftermarket even lighter stuff).
There are guys out there who have their Red rear derrailleurs even lighter than stock. But I didn't want to sacrifice durability.
I ordered my new roadie yesterday and it had to have Red stock. TCR Advanced SL 2. Then it will be time to drop the weight on it. ;)
_____________________________________________
Rick, "Retired" hobbyist athlete
Trying to come back slowly from acute A-Fib
That is why when I went for drivetrain for my lightweight weenie build I used Red. (Brakes, cranks and such were aftermarket even lighter stuff).
There are guys out there who have their Red rear derrailleurs even lighter than stock. But I didn't want to sacrifice durability.
I ordered my new roadie yesterday and it had to have Red stock. TCR Advanced SL 2. Then it will be time to drop the weight on it. ;)
_____________________________________________
Rick, "Retired" hobbyist athlete
Trying to come back slowly from acute A-Fib