Have you read the "things to know about this forum" thread?

I actually have not read that, and I apologize for the posting.

I will take it down immediately.
Mike.

---

Michael Rosenblat

http://www.evidencebasedcoaching.ca
Evidence-Based Coaching: Making science work for athletes.

I was just trying to save the link before it was taken down.

Ah, it was saved automatically in the browse history.

Stephen Seiler is referencing a lot of research in this video
http://www.canal-insep.fr/...r_stephen_seiler-mov


And of course, more research has to be done :-)

Can you pm me the link please? I skimmed it earlier but it's not in my history.m

---

who's smarter than you're? i'm!

You know. It's perfectly acceptable to start a thread here about the topic in the blog post... I clicked the link initially because it sounded interesting, but I'd prefer to have the info here so that people will scrutinize it to death. Then when you do your next blog post, you'll have more to write. Just put the link to your blog in your signature or something.

---

Dtyrrell

I think you should put the link back in. That topic is very relevant to this forum and could make for a very interesting discussion.

---

Simplify, Train, Live

Yes, please put the link back. If it is an issue, let Dan remove it

.

---

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep

usually the way you can make it semi-acceptable is put a bunch of useful info directly in the text of the post

and then a link to the full article

---

---

Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter

Good point, but I still would let Dan do the enforcement.

.

---

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep

This post seems relevant to this thread: http://www.evidencebasedcoaching.ca/...ng-intensity_72.html

I think that's what he did originally? He posted a large section of what he wrote and then the link in sig line, no? I saw he posted it on another site and then noticed it here. When I opened the thread I gave him credit for following protocol.

---

"I think I've cracked the code. double letters are cheaters except for perfect squares (a, d, i, p and y). So Leddy isn't a cheater... "

Below is the summary from the article that I initially posted a link to. I feel that this is most appropriate way to provide the results of the study without re-directing anyone to my website. Again, I apologize for the initial posting, as I should have read the rules.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

There are a number of variables to consider when designing an endurance-training program in order to limit fatigue and optimize performance. Training-intensity is a key variable that can be manipulated in such a way that it can lead to either an improvement or a deterioration in performance.

There are three physiological training zones that can be used to determine training-intensity when designing an endurance-training program. Zone 1 (Z1) is below the lactate threshold (LT1) or aerobic threshold. Zone 2 (Z2) falls between LT1 and LT2 (anaerobic threshold), and zone 3 (Z3) is above LT2. An ideal training program will include an appropriate distribution across these training zones.

The two common training distribution models include a polarized training model (POL) and a threshold training model (THR). POL involves approximately 80%, 5%, and 15% of training in Z1, Z2, and Z3 respectively. THR involves 45%, 35%, and 20% of training in Z1, Z2, and Z3. The purpose of this review is to systematically review the available evidence on the effects of different training-intensity distribution models on markers of endurance performance.

There is moderate level evidence demonstrating that a POL model leads to greater improvements in 10 km running time performance than a THR model in recreational and sub-elite runners.

There is low level evidence demonstrating that a POL model leads to improvements in running economy in competitive endurance athletes (cross-country skiing, cycling, triathlon, middle- or long-distance runners).

There is low level evidence demonstrating that a POL model leads to greater improvements in VO2peak than a THR or HVT model in competitive endurance athletes (cross-country skiing, cycling, triathlon, middle- or long-distance runners)

More research is necessary to accurately assess the mechanisms for which altering training distribution improves performance. Studies of greater methodological design are required to provide more conclusive results on the effects of different training models on endurance performance.

---

Michael Rosenblat

http://www.evidencebasedcoaching.ca
Evidence-Based Coaching: Making science work for athletes.