xeon wrote:
Grant.Reuter wrote:
Yeah to cutting down the number eligible not necessarily 1000 vs 2000 but increasing the qualification requirements. If it's harder to go, my view is, faster athletes would be more likely to show up as it's seen as bigger achievement.
I just don't see qualifying as a big achievement with how easy it is to get in. It should be difficult since it's nationals. But if it does cut down their participant numbers then it's a whole different scenario when USAT has to pitch it to cities to host with less people.
I just don't think the everyone gets to go to nationals methodology is the best way to move AG racing forward.
I agree with you about it being easy... but I race with some people that don't qualify and their perspective is different. They'd love to qualify and even then, they "might" go to Nationals.
I try to remember that we all have different perceptions... my reality is that I've qualified for Nationals in all but the first two races when I got into triathlon back in 2009.
Me qualifying at this point means me finishing a race without getting a flat. Some of my tri friends, them qualifying means they had the race of their lives sometimes.
They need the numbers and honestly I feel the spread is there with those that are competitive and those that are in the 2:20 plus crowd. I do think numbers are down this year due to a few things... 70.3 Worlds in the US coming up, Omaha isn't super exciting for many, Worlds next year is Australia.
I like Omaha and I'm excited the weather is looking cool, maybe even wetsuit legal!
I qualified at a race where I got a flat......
As for the West Coast / East Coat discussion. The races need to be where its "easy" to get to and it doesn't conflict with "Major Events". For example - They hit Du Nats perfectly for 2018. Easy airport for lots of people and drive-able distance for a TON of people. Weekend is perfect as it aligns with a lot of school spring breaks, cheap, but "decent chain hotels". Doesn't conflict with races such as AZ DU or Fly-by-Night.
Cleveland also seems good. Easy airport, drivable for lots of people, plenty of hotels, low cost city, early enough to not conflict with kids school (other than a very few in the south), not to many conflicting events.