Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of)
Quote | Reply
There is not much is talked about the Ultimate Sports Engineering R1’s so I though I would share my thoughts. I have been testing/trying different bars for years in a search for one that is highly adjustable, fast and UCI legal. Those three things typically don’t mix well. In my quest to find that unicorn I have a new favorite. The R1’s are adjustable, and UCI legal. I didn’t get to test them earlier this year at the tunnel but I have no dough they are super slick. In many of the latest hour record attempts where people aren’t bound by sponsorship a familiar sight is the USE Bars. This prompted me to give them a try. I typically don’t buy products without lots of reviews and or independent data, but the use of them by pro’s who have done testing and solely want the fastest products was compelling.


Background -I am not a Triguy but a TTer looking for every ounce of speed. I got the R1 bars for my Track TT bike with the goal of making the fastest rig I can.

When I got the bars they can in a fancy zipper molded soft case. It’s nicer than my laptop case. While its sexy, I see little use for it as once you install the bars, it’s tossed into a closet and forgotten. Give me a cardboard box and a lower price.


Once you unzip the case the beauty is exposed. The first thing I noticed is how thin the bars are and how little surface area they have. They have the Bomb shape handles on the ends which are large but the shape is very aero and I suspect much more aero than just the typical round shape. The bar is very thin, at the end it is approximately one inch wide, and at the stem area it’s approximately one and a half inches. With being so thin one would wonder if they are stiff? After riding them for several weeks, I say they are on the stiffer side.


Adjustably- They came with a boat load of spacers to raise the pad to preferred height but my concern was how low can they get. With the bars setup with the pads on top of the extensions and the extensions on the base bar they are about the same stack as my current 3T’s slammed. I was really hoping to get lower by putting the extensions under the base bar but there was no hardware for this. After contacting USE, I was able to get the hardware to put the extensions under the base bar. I don’t know if my bars were missing this hardware or if it’s a special order/request item. This situation caused me not to be able to test the bar in the tunnel. (A side note, the lower pad height and extensions under the bars looks like it saving me about 10w, with my testing at the track). The pads have significance adjustablity to go super narrow or wide. The reach of the pads is limited to a few cm but it fell into my sweetspot.


Integrated Stem- The base bars are not round in the center stem area but maintain the narrow profile so you need a special shim to use a regular stem which was provided or you can use the R1 integrated stem. I went with the integrated because typically stems and bars that are integrated have lower drag numbers. The integrated stem is one fancy stem and maybe too fancy, it has 9 bolts,. It can be very frustrating and time consuming when you are wrenching on it. But when all together it is a very aero looking and sleek design.


Pads- The pads are small and not very plush. Coming off my 3T pads that are large and soft, the R1 pads took some getting use to. Some riders may need to add additional padding to get comfortable but their small form function has a purpose in reducing drag, and I will take that trade off. Now that I am use to them, they don’t really bother me much and especially when I am at race pace and nothing is comfortable.


My thoughts:
  • Expensive, but what top bars are not?
  • Very adjustable
  • UCI legal
  • Not the most comfortable pads, more of a (911 and not a Cadillac)
  • I think they are fast but have no hard data comparing them against other bars but I know the lower position I can get on them is faster.
  • I think they are sexified and am saving my coins to put them on my road TT.
  • If speed is your thing, you should put these on your short list.



PS- Since there has been little discussion about the R1 bars I want to give the good people of this forum a DC rainmaker review but because of my lack of time and inattention it turned out to be more like a Cliff Note to Cat In The Hat.

[/url]


[/url]


[[/url]

BoulderCyclingCoach.com
Last edited by: rockdude: Apr 29, 16 16:58
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nice write up, even if it is the cliff notes version. ;)

The R1 is probably the only other bar I would have gone with had I not scored the Bayonet 3 Devox. However, the price to play had me second guessing every time I looked to pull the trigger on it. I'm sure they can, but are the pads able to be run narrower?

My YouTubes

Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [Stalkan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The pads on the current setup are about 4/5 cm apart but that is misleading because of the size and the steep up turn angle on the outside of the pad. My forearms are near touching. There is one more closer position I could have used which would almost make the pads touch each other.

BoulderCyclingCoach.com
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I figured as much. I run pads almost touching right now and my arms/elbows kind of push against each other due to the angle I am running the pads at. Below is my setup, do you think the R1s would run that narrow? I think so, by what you are describing. It's mostly academic as I doubt I would change, but it would be good information to have.

by 4 to 5cm do you mean the center to center measurement?



My YouTubes

Last edited by: Stalkan: Apr 29, 16 9:00
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
USE stuff is nice, and British :-) Not sure if everything is still made in the UK ?

They have been around years, with most of the retro MTB stuff still going strong.

They have always tried to be a bit off the wall / out of the ordinary - it seems to have worked well for them :-)

Retro titanium on my retro (1990) MTB :



I was admiring those bars at Tri Expo a few weeks ago - very nice they are too :-)

WD :-)
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [Stalkan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wow, that is tight. I haven't put them in the closet position yet but I think the inside edge of the pad would tough or be like one cm apart. My setup is 4/5 cm apart from inside edge to inside edge of the pads.

BoulderCyclingCoach.com
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks again for the write up and the info....oh, and props on the bike, that sucker looks very fast!

My YouTubes

Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [WD Pro] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have used the U.S.E stuff since I started riding. I loved the Alien post, it was a WW favorite and their exposure lights are super. I have an older model that I have been using for years. I have always been impressed with the quality of their products.

BoulderCyclingCoach.com
Last edited by: rockdude: Apr 29, 16 9:25
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am currently recycling dads carbon alien into a upfront computer mount ! Their stuff lives forever ... lol
Last edited by: WD Pro: Apr 29, 16 9:37
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
looks sweet, nice write up.

I've been interested in comparing some USE against my Nano's. Looks like there's a lot less stack that 3T's stuff.

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [leegoocrap] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was using the Nano's before I got the R1's. When you install the extensions under the bars you can get a lower stack height which is one of the reasons I wanted the R1's. Here are some more pix it took yesterday. Looks like everything is in order for my Hour Record Attempt on May 8th.















BoulderCyclingCoach.com
Last edited by: rockdude: May 2, 16 6:40
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
very slick, where are you running on the 8th?

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [leegoocrap] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
At the Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs under the dome before they take it down next week.

BoulderCyclingCoach.com
Quote Reply
Re: U.S.E. R1 Bar Review (sort of) [rockdude] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wow, that's epic! Good luck, will be following.

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply