M~ wrote:
Was her article an op-ed or was it written as direct report on the even itself? I couldn't tell.
i don't know. but if you look at her twitter feed it seems to me she made up her mind how the conference was going to be in advance of the conference.
i think if she would have attended the conference she'd have found that her stats were either false or misleading. the awards won, the speakers, the moderators, the planners, the content, was largely influenced or populated by or championed women (from what i saw and from the feedback i've received). in erin's defense, you couldn't have known that without going to the conference.
still, the older i get the bigger my world gets, and the more i see that i just didn't see before. we "older white men", to user erin's term to describe those who put on this conference (tho in fact it's probably 60/40 women who put on this conference), have suffered from narrow viewports. we were literally "thoughtless" on many fronts - well meaning, poor seeing. your world will get bigger if you let it. in most cases, each of our worlds got bigger. i doubt any of us pictured a woman winning the ron smith award when we conceived it, but this year we unanimously agreed that one woman outshone all the men.
but, i still allow for the blind spot i might have, which is why i'm not the judge of this. women and those of color, those of different morphologies, geographies, cultures, economic situations, are best able to determine whether the plans, the atmosphere, the direction was correct or veered from the mark.
Dan Empfield
aka Slowman