Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance)
Quote | Reply
I currently have the F5 and use it for all training; treadmill runs included. I'm trying to determine if a foot pod would be more accurate than the built-in accelerometer functionality of the Garmin. The F5 results seem a bit variable compared to treadmill. Not that the treadmills I generally use (health club, my basement) are super accurate, of course.

Thanks in advance for any insight or experiences.

Tinman
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes, footpod mo betta.

All you have to do with the watch is change your armswing to influence measured pace.
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The footpod is way more accurate, especially if you do a few runs outdoors to get it fully dialed in.

YMMV but for me the accelerometer is hilarious. The faster I put the treadmill the slower the watch says I'm going. I am not even kidding. I can set the treadmill at 6:00 mile and it will say I am doing 11:00 a mile but if I reverse it then the watch says I am doing 7:00 a mile.

Every garmin I've ever had with the accelerometer has been that way.

https://reluctantmultisport.wordpress.com
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [marklemcd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
marklemcd wrote:
The footpod is way more accurate, especially if you do a few runs outdoors to get it fully dialed in.

YMMV but for me the accelerometer is hilarious. The faster I put the treadmill the slower the watch says I'm going. I am not even kidding. I can set the treadmill at 6:00 mile and it will say I am doing 11:00 a mile but if I reverse it then the watch says I am doing 7:00 a mile.

Every garmin I've ever had with the accelerometer has been that way.


My old 920XT seems to be more accurate on treadmill than my new 935.
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I don't know how accurate the F5's accelerometer is, but the Garmin footpod is extremely accurate if you've done a few outdoor runs with it to get it calibrated. I can't imagine the wrist-based accelerometer would be more accurate than one that's measuring how far your foot moves.


<The Dew Abides>
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have found that the accelerometer is good for paces between 7:00 and up. Once I start doing more speed or intervals, the pace is 00:20 off at least from the treadmill.

I have found the footpod to be way more accurate at faster speeds, but the accelerometer was surprisingly accurate sometimes.
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I also have the Fenix 5. I tried several treadmill runs without the foot pod and because I have a long, loping stride the accelerometer measure me at close to 20 seconds per mile slower than my actual pace. I would highly recommend the foot pod as it helps increase data accuracy. Just make sure you have the right info in your athlete profile in the Fenix (e.g. stride length).
Last edited by: chicoxcrunner: Dec 7, 17 13:44
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Footpod indoors far better than the watch’s accelerometer, my 920 was 20-30 seconds off as well.
Tried this one a few months back and i think this will work with your f5
http://www.milestonepod.com/

"Pain is NOT temporary,you remember every bit of it"
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Agree with everyone else. I do recommend if you’re going to be using it a lot to take it outside every few weeks. If your running improves and you change cadence/leg speed for a certain it’ll start throwing the numbers off. But besides that it’s pretty remarkably on.

-----------------------------------------------------------
De Soto Sport Athlete
Formerly Draketriathlon
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Same issues as everyone else, and same (good) result when I use the foot pod instead.

I don't always remember the foot pod...and the 9:15 pace on the watch compared to the 8:20pace on the machine is why I'm not doing the 100/100 challenge. /Pink
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The accelerometer is pathetic. A run of the mill foot pod is much better, better even than GPS. A Stryd, though, is on another level.
Quote Reply
Re: Treadmill Running: Foot Pod vs. Fenix 5 (pace, distance) [tinman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I find treadmills much more accurate than my watch. I don't use a footpod so can't speak to that but I workout at 3 different gyms depending on where I am working that day and use maybe 25 (I am guessing) different treadmills from about 5-7 different companies...and they are all pretty consistent with one another for pace/time/distance. No way all of them are off by the exact same amount - meaning its would appear they are reliable indicators of my time, distance, and pace (and most of what I have read says this same thing). This leads me to believe that most treadmills are probably more accurate than the 'treadmills are way off' comments I see a lot. But sure, if only use one you can't compare and see that difference like someone that uses multiple. Having said that, my workouts on my watch are always off on the treadmill and its so easy to trick the watch on the treadmill. I would assume pods are way more accurate but personally I just record the distance the treadmill says at the end and call it a day.
Last edited by: surferdude: Dec 9, 17 6:14
Quote Reply