happyscientist wrote:
Have fun. It is beautiful country, and if you have never been there before, Yellowstone will blow your mind (unless you are one of those people who gets cranky without TV and internet).
I think if you're going to have one national park, yellowstone is absolutely it(or maybe nationalize one of the big thru hiking trails, as an underdog contender). But otherwise, I wasn't terribly impressed. Olypmic Peninsula(and other areas in the PNW are comparable, I'm sure) has better forests(as do some areas of the east coast), Northern Nevada and Southern Arizona/NM have better deserts, the Rockies are more impressive, etc etc. That area is so varied, it should absolutely be a destination and preserved so it can
be a destination. But I think that's it's strength-the variety of the environment, not the strength of the the environment. Lots of places are prettier, but not so varied.
happyscientist wrote:
Have fun. It is beautiful country, and if you have never been there before, Yellowstone will blow your mind (unless you are one of those people who gets cranky without TV and internet).
I think if you're going to have one national park, yellowstone&the grand tetons should be combined for it. Absolutely(or maybe nationalize one of the big thru hiking trails, as an underdog contender). But otherwise, I wasn't terribly impressed. Olypmic Peninsula(and other areas in the PNW are comparable, I'm sure) has better forests(as do some areas of the east coast), Northern Nevada and Southern Arizona/NM have better deserts, the Rockies are more impressive, It doesn't have the best prairies. etc etc. That area is so varied, it should absolutely be a destination and preserved so it can
be a destination. But I think that's it's strength-the variety of the environment, not the strength of the the environment. Lots of places are prettier, but not so varied.