Halfcrazy wrote:
chadtimmerman wrote:
Murph333 wrote:
Hello TrainerRoad staff,
Thanks for the great program and awesome podcast. I don't think I would of been able to finish my first IM (Mont Tremblant) without the help of your program.
Now that I am done my A race, (while it didn't go anywhere as well as I had planned I still finished and the bike was the strongest portion) I have decided I am going to race another full again but this year it will be IMCA in Whistler
with the race being ~42 weeks away that gives plenty of time to sort out training and get a lot better, I am concerned with the bike on this course due to the large amount of climbs, so I want to be as strong of a cyclist as possible. (currently overweight and lower FTP, 2.4 W/kg goal would be to over 3w/Kg by winter time this year.
should I start with
Low Volume Full Base -> Low Volume Build then to Mid Volume Base -> Mid Volume Build -> Mid Volume Specialty
or
Sweet spot Base -> Sustained Power build -> (with my own swimming and running thrown in) -> then Mid Volume Base/Build/Specialty
Thanks again guys!!!!!!!
Hey Murph,
I still think you have enough room for improvement that the Traditional Base route isn't the best fit - Sweet Spot Base is (especially if you're doing low-volume). And if you aren't using the tri plans but instead relying on your own swim & run workouts, the Sustained Power Build or the 40k TT plans are excellent ways to increase your higher-end endurance/FTP.
Hi there Trainerroad experts!
Apologies if this question has been asked ad nauseum but here is my challenge. I'm 50 weeks out from IM Mt (lots of time to develop as a cyclist of which I am a poor one). My FTP is really quite poor ~ 180 ish Male 45 and about 145 lbs. Nothing stellar but a good position on a tri bike and the results are ok and I generally make up on the run the positions I lose on the bike over a HIM.
All of that aside, I really, really want to increase my FTP over the winter. My aerobics are good and I have an independent swim program and running program to follow. If 4% increase a month is possible, that's really what I want to target. Continual improvement in power.
Do I use the Base program (mid-volume) or Build program (mid-volume) or something else? Will there be significantly better and bigger returns on high-volume plans?
Your insight is greatly appreciated.
Hi, let's first address the higher volume/higher performance question since determining the volume of which plans you'll use is probably more important than the plans themselves.
'Greater stress' is a very relative term meaning that entry-level riders can see a low-volume plan as totally sufficient in pushing them outside of what they're accustomed to when it comes to training. As we become more experienced
and retain a high level of training consistency, high/er volumes are likely necessary in order to spur continued training adaptation and keep furthering the challenge.
The tough part is determining just how much additional stress is productive and doesn't cut into other facets of your lifestyle, keeps you motivated and healthy, keeps your performance on the upswing. This can come in so many forms though, and this makes it tough to just say "add more easy mileage" or "do a block of VO2max work" or "follow a bike-only plan for 8 weeks". But those are my three most common replies when I'm asked for recommendations on nudging up the workload with the intent of improving FTP.
I occasionally steer riders with a lot of time and a spotty history of aerobic base work - whether long/slow or short/intense - who will spend long durations on the bike in competition (typically full-distance or double-IM triathletes) toward a longer, slower base approach. This is in line with our Traditional Base plans but assumes you'll spend 10+ hours/week on the bike indoors (closer to 15+ outdoors) in order to see noticeable improvements in aerobic capabilities via the low-intensity route. Does it work? For most, but it requires a lot of time in the saddle which I've never been a big fan of.
The VO2max work is almost always a great way to realize a quick gain whether it's used to set the stage for future training, add some late-season power improvement or to create some room for subsequent FTP improvements. And for all these reasons, the VO2max Training Camp will be the first one we release, though it's still months from being available.
So for the time being, and with so much time ahead to prepare for an event that's nearly a full year out, I think dedicating 8 weeks of concentration to the bike is a really strong solution. You can either dive right into a Sustained Power Build for a couple months or mix things up a bit with the 40k TT plan - which, incidentally, contains a pretty healthy dose of VO2max work that you won't see in the Sustained Power Build plan.
The 40k TT Specialty plan is my recommendation for most triathletes looking to boost their cycling capabilities in a bike-focused manner, but I also recommend it whenever I hear "the bike is my weakest event", "I just want to raise my FTP" or something along those lines. Certainly don't fully neglect your run/swim training, but keep them on a back burner with just some easy aerobic maintenance/skills work while you chase bigger more recognizable improvements in sustainable power on the bike.
So to tie this all back to the volume dilemma (tri-lemma, tee hee), you'll have to compare what you've been doing to what you plan to do such that the increase in stress is subtle and on-paper-manageable. You'll have a good idea of whether or not you can
actually handle more work (or if you need
less stress) as the early weeks wind toward that first recovery week, but I caution against any more than 2 days of high-intensity work plus some added weekend intensity for those who are handling the weekday intensity well.
I recommend starting with the mid-volume plans and seeing how you feel coming out of week 4 before deciding to bump up to high-volume. Those first 3 weeks can be misleadingly manageable bringing riders to think that they can maintain that higher-volume trajectory only to leave them dragging ass when weeks 5 and 6 ramp things up even more.
So get through the first 4 weeks of mid-volume and
then you can start making decisions like toning down the Wednesday Tempo ride to Endurance levels or skipping any Monday or Friday workouts or toning down the intensity on Saturdays...or going to the high volume plans or even just picking high-volume interval workouts but maintaining the mid-volume structure.
In any case, play it cautiously and keep the increases realistic and mildly incremental - no big changes all at once.
Head Coach at TrainerRoad
Co-host of the Ask a Cycling Coach Podcast