KingMidas wrote:
Hi Chad,
I am doing your full triathlon mid volume plan. I am following the bike workouts but doing my own swim and run workouts.
Currently I am in week 10 of the base mid volume and I was looking ahead into the build mid volume and specialty and I have a few concerns and was wondering if you could clarify.
In the base plan, weeks 9,10, 11 are 483,442, 511 TSS respectively where as the highest TSS in the mid volume build is 474 with most of the weeks being in the upper 300's and low 400's.
Furthermore the base is a Tue - VO2max, Thu-high tempo, Fri-sweet spot, and Sat-long format. In the build, Tue stays VO2max, Thur becomes over/under's, but the Fri workout becomes a recovery and saturday stays long. It just seems to me that the base is tougher than the build or the specialty. I am really liking the tough base plan right now and don't want to decondition over the build and specialty phase.
Can you please explain why the build seems easier (especially the Fri workouts) than the base and if this is intentional?
Thanks in advance.
Sure thing, happy to clarify.
First off, TSS can't escalate from the beginning of a training season through to the end as there's more to the composition of each training phase than simply lifting TSS. The Build phase starts to incorporate differing types of stress that take different, and often enough, higher tolls on an athlete's body thereby requiring more thorough recovery either in the form of full rest or, in the case of higher-volume plans, lighter workouts following harder ones.
Additionally, the TSS metrics aren't always completely telling since we only report the bike TSS and the swim & run TSS's were estimated during my design process such that each overall weekly load escalates appropriately (and de-escalates during recovery and taper weeks).
I can assure you that if you follow the plan consistently that there won't be any deconditioning
unless you recognize a focus that addresses one of your strengths when that time could be better spent targeting a limiter better served by this additional focus. But, as always, this is one limitation of broad plans delivered to individual athletes.
With that said, far and away most athletes who are new to structured training, or perhaps more effectively structured training, will see steady improvement as long as they don't over-commit (i.e. pick a plan that's too high in volume for their experience level, stress level, adaptability, etc.) and respect the stress-recovery balance.
Then, as athletes learn more about their capabilities and needs, the onus shifts more toward their own ability to make small modifications and a little away from feeling bound by a coach's plan design.
So yes, everything you'll see in these plans is intentional (except the occasional typos ;-) but you're not limited by the structure if you have a better grasp on what you require as an individual.
Head Coach at TrainerRoad
Co-host of the Ask a Cycling Coach Podcast