hey folks, solid advice. i'll answer this as best as i can. not to say what any of you suggested is crap, but to give you more info about me, so you can better help me.
MadTownTRI wrote:
Run the half for all the reasons others have listed. My $.02, I did the full last year, the strip at night stuff is cool. Like really freaking cool, especially because it was my first time to Vegas. But you get all of that in the half course, and the half is flat and fast. The full you run for 15 miles thru boring commercial areas, foothills, and pretty meh residential areas up in north Vegas. The full RnR course kinda sucks.
100% running the full. there is no question about that. i'm there to tick nevada off, then climb for a few days. it just happened to work out that i could kill 2 birds with 1 stone. no way i'm going back to vegas until i can climb into the much higher grades and do some of the iconic red rock climbs (another 3-4 years away)
slbva wrote:
Like you I thought I was in the shape of my life during my tri season last year. I trained for a 70.3 and had a great race and wanted to do something else before completely ending the season. Decided to run a marathon since I had PRed every run distance during the tri season and thought with my cross training I could run a decent marathon. Due to a few different commitments I only had 3 weeks to train for the marathon (allowing for a 2 week rest period before the race). Had done a 15 and 16 mile long run during 70.3 training so started marathon training with a 15 mile long run and 30 miles for week 1 of the train up, 20 mile long run and 42 miles for week 2, and 20 mile long run and 40 miles for week 3. Weekly totals were between 19 and 27 miles for the previous 8 weeks (plus swimming and biking). Weather was perfect for the marathon and I ended up running a 3.15. My half marathon PR before the marathon was a 1.36 that I did in my 70.3. I did run a 1.32 on a semi hilly course a month after the marathon so our half marathon PRs are similar. My first 20 miles of the marathon felt great. Last 6 a bit of a struggle but not too awful (was running 7.20s for first 20 and last 6 were around 8 flats). Good luck and listen to your body during training but with a short run focused build (with your cross training background) you can definitely PR your race. Have a great run and enjoy!
thanks man. i'm not worried about long runs. after my first marathon, i gave up long runs. i've run 8 marathons since my first one and most of it has been on 7-10 weeks of 30mpw training. i hit my first 40mpw last winter when i decided to train for savannah marathon and ended up with a PR.
i'm also not really that tired from the ironman efforts. immt was a training day. i purposely walked jogged the run. i even stopped to stretch 10 or so times. i have been more sore after half ironmans..
imchoo, though a rough day, was not physically too bad on my body. of the marathon, i probably walked 12 of it. again, i was a little sore, but even less so than mont tremblant.
mstange22 wrote:
I'd get some Dr. Scholl's "ball of foot" met pads to help with the met pain. They've been a lifesaver for me.
Then think about a 10 day taper. 7 days isn't enough IMO.
I don't think all of the cross-training is that big of a deal. It'll probably help. Like you said, you're not trying to break 3 hours and your half PR projects out to about what you're trying to run. You just need to be sure you do whatever you can to boost your run endurance, which is the most important element of marathoning.
I would make sure to get in a long run of 16-22 every week and a mid-week med-long run of 12-15.
Tempo is more important than VO2max, so if you want to get in speedwork, do something between mile reps at LT up to 4-5 miles at LT in the middle of an 8-10 mile run. Do these at 7min pace or better (goal MP-25 sec).
i'm a believer of long runs up to 13-14 miles. after that. i just don't see the benefits. it takes me longer to recover. i would rather run 13 in the am, then 3-5 in the evening. i'm also a believe of total volume over the week.. ie: 6 miles 5 days a week, then 10 on sat and sunday is better than a long run on sat or sunday followed by a bunch of 3-8 mile runs. a
i do like the tempo work though. yesterday was my first run. i got home really late from work and just wanted to see if i had any speed in my legs. first mile i went out at 6:48, felt fine. 2nd mile i picked up the tempo (ran to the track) and ran 2 laps at 5:01 and 5:03 pace, then slowed it down to finish the 2nd mile at 6:43. i jogged home at 8:30 pace. total of 2.8ish miles?
today i hit the treadmill for 30 miles and banged out 4 miles. did a short 1 min walk, ramped pace to 8 for first mile, then to 7:30, then to 6:40, then finished with a 3 minute walk as well. felt fine (i run 30 mins on treadmill before i climb)
ziggie204 wrote:
ahhchon wrote:
all interesting info guys. thanks. i'll digest and respond when i'm home.
i'm surprised so many people don't incorporate more cross training into their marathon prep. it's not like i'm aiming for a sub 3 marathon. we're talking a 3:15 here. it seems pretty pedestrian for most people.
3:15 pedestrian?
1:33 on a hard half course means you're probably in the ballpark speed wise, but for that half to translate over to a marry you need muscular endurance and I don't see that happening with 25 mpw running plus a few weeks at 40mpw. Mile 22 is going to be ugly, those last few miles will be absolutely miserable. If you want to hit 3:15, you'll probably have to run with the 3:05-ish group and then pray you don't fade too bad at the end. If you go out with the 3:15 group I don't see you holding that pace for 26, sorry. But maybe you'll pull it off, let us know how it turns out, sounds like you're committed. Ditch all the other sports, run as much as you can, and I'd taper off 10 days out, not 7. You're not getting enough incremental bump day in those extra few days that makes it worth it imo.
cool. never really thought of it that way. i've never run a 3:15. by pedestrian, i mean a lot of friends i know who can't run as fast as i can on a track, or have slower 5k pr and 10k pr's than i do can run that. most of my friends who can run a 3:15 open marry can't run a 1:40 off the bike.. a close friend who is physically (pretty much) my identical twin, runs a 2:40 open marry, but at the HIM he runs the same split as i do. not that it means much in open marathon... i just "feel" my potential is faster than 3:15, have nothing to prove it, ha ha.
alex_korr wrote:
I tend to agree. Shoot for maybe 45-ish miles per week, quit cycling and swimming for now. Run more and run slow. Zone 2 max. For longer runs, take a couple of 1 min break here and there if the HR gets too high.
Gtjojo189 wrote:
My perspective. You are doing too much. I did two IM's this year, faired way better than you, and am already back running faster than what you are saying you are running, but there's no way I'd risk a marathon right now with how I feel and I don't have any nagging stuff (just feeling fatigued) that you claim you do. It's time to regroup and prep for crushing next year.
Personal experience. In 2012 I did Augusta 70.3 and MCM within 4-5 weeks of each other. I went run heavy on my Augusta training and ended up having a PR for that time and course that day at Augusta. I was also knocking 18+ mile long runs out around a 7 flat pace. Went up to MCM and ended up running 6:55-7 for the first 18 then wheels came off the bus and I ran right under 3:20. I really think an earlier poster summed it up talking about speedwork and not just training long. I really think to be in the shape to PR a marathon you need to be running 50+ miles a week.
I can only think of one instance in the past 5-6 years of watching this forum where someone has received a bunch of advice and proved everyone wrong and that was the guy who called his shot for KQ'ing at Texas. I'd say that that means the forum generally has a good track record with advice.
not trying to prove anyone right or wrong. but i guess it would be great to prove everyone wrong.
i do believe someone above hit it on the head. the muscular endurance is def going to be my biggest issue.
i guess it doesn't hurt to shoot for 3:15. if i end up with anything in the 3:25 and under region, i'm going to be pretty stoked. PR is a PR, right?
i'm going to do an easy 5 on the tmill tomorrow. thursday i'll be able to do a bit more tempo, friday i was going to go a bit longer and easier (8:30 pace, 8 miles). sat i'm at a wedding, so i'm going to try and squeeze in a 5k sometime during the day. sunday i'll do more tempo running?
that should put me around 40 for the week. good, right?