windschatten wrote:
If the rest of the bike is the same as the rim brake version, we finally get an answer to which set-up is faster ;-).
First off I'd love to know whether the 'shift technology' is effective against a rear disc brake. If it moves most of the air beyond the disc on the non-drive side then they're on to a winner. What the Andean tries to achieve by building the frame around the wheels, seems to make more sense.
Second, you have to compare rim-wheels against disc-wheels, Zipp and HED offer options optimised for both and that is what we need to see. Whether disc braking allows more exotic rim shapes in the future to emerge is something I have no understanding of, but as a potential buyer I'd like to know how future proof my purchase is.
If the disc-brake option is close in aerodynamics to the rim-wheeled version then the issue of 'effective braking' comes into play. On the one hand the mechanical disc brake would be a good coupling for the USE Tula aerobars but you wouldn't be getting much in terms of improved braking compared to rim based options, as far as I understand. So we're left with hydraulic brakes versus rim brakes and there is no doubt that in the dry the benefits are minimal but on wet and technical courses the hydraulic option wins. Finally, this is all new applications of disc braking tchnology and I feel we're a long way off from having the best solutions for time trial purposes. Obviously if we're talking about what you can buy today then the disc option seems a bit contrived, like the bike industry is forcing us into a new standard. However, what is the potential five years down the road?
SteveMc