As I was running this morning, I was reflecting on a race that's coming up for me that has a ton of climbing on the bike. I've always, and I mean ALWAYS blown myself up on my bike legs, in all but maybe one race. I've finally been training with virtual power, and will have a power meter by the time this race rolls around. That being said, when I come upon the aforementioned hills, is there a generally accepted rule to climb based on effort, output or speed?
Again, trying my best to not kill myself on the bike again. I think my fitness is an order of magnitude better than prior years, but I still want to make sure I've enough to run a solid 10K. My opinion is constant effort, based on a relative heart rate zone, with an overall power number in mind for the ride based on my current training, which, frankly, doesn't include much in the way of hills.
Any help or confirmation of my instinct would be greatly appreciated.
As a brief aside, it seems the more informed I become about the training and racing aspects of this sport, the less I know about the training and racing aspects of this sport.
Cheers,
Robert
Again, trying my best to not kill myself on the bike again. I think my fitness is an order of magnitude better than prior years, but I still want to make sure I've enough to run a solid 10K. My opinion is constant effort, based on a relative heart rate zone, with an overall power number in mind for the ride based on my current training, which, frankly, doesn't include much in the way of hills.
Any help or confirmation of my instinct would be greatly appreciated.
As a brief aside, it seems the more informed I become about the training and racing aspects of this sport, the less I know about the training and racing aspects of this sport.
Cheers,
Robert