The only debate is Sweetland vs Findlay for 3rd women IMO. Otherwise Yorke & Tyler far higher ranking than Kyle on men's side, top 2 women a lock leaving Sweetland and Findlay to be decided. Should be Sweetland as higher ranked. There is no domestique debate on either side for medals. Interesting times for ITU racing in Canada.
Clearly we are well into the post-Whitfield era. Although, Findlay, Sweetland, and Jones could be considered transitional. Others, in contention, really are the legacy, of inspiration from Simon Whitfield - Kretz, Mislachuk etc . . .
Tough call on what TriCan should do. With all due respect, none of this crowd will be contending for medals (I'd happily be proven wrong) - a top-10 place from a man and/or woman, would be considered a, "win"!
There is a good case to let the younger ones go, "for the experience". Or do you give a Kyle Jones, a one-last-time-round chance?
With all due respect, Findlay and Sweetland, have never been able to get back the the flashes of brilliance and true greatness they showed when they were younger. Might they come up big again?
I like what I see in the youngsters, Kretz and Mislachuk - they have the ability on a great day to be in the top-10 in a WC race - but so do 20 other triathletes in a given WC race.
It's interesting and ironic that while our ITU fortunes have waned to a significant degree, our Long-Course(Ironman & 70.3), athletes are crushing it right now!
Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog