Ex-cyclist wrote:
wsrobert wrote:
So they've released a single chart detailing the aero data? No testing details/protocol. That's disappointing.
I wanted to like this bike. But I just see a giant headache.
Yeah, if you look at the chart, it looks like the s5 is really only has a bit more drag on the non-drive side at yaw over about 7.5. Otherwise they are basically about the same. The S5, except for the stupid BBright standard, would be infinitely easier to live with.
Praxis and Wheels Mfg make such great adapters at this point for most of the wonky standards that I dont get too bent out of shape about that stuff.
Here sits the S5, 4 years old (3 years?) and still arguably at the top of the heap - or in the same conversation. Aero wise at least.
Curious to me is that Trek has explicitly called out that they tested an AR2 - which would be mechanical. And with what bar? What bar was used with all other bikes tested? SO MANY QUESTIONS.
"One Line Robert"