There has been lots of discussion on this forum about the value of a pro race. This weekend I headed over to Galveston, and I tried to observe the values of the pros with an open mind. Below is a brief synopsis.
Personally, I knew there was a pro race. I knew this because I was seeking out a race with the requisite prize purse to qualify myself as elite (I failed, btw). The web site NEVER listed the pro field, facebook and twitter were mum on the pros too. During check in and bike check there was no mention of who the athletes were, what they were racing for, or any of that!! I was actively seeking a pro field list, and could not find it! I even posted on twitter, with no results.
On race morning I asked five athletes in transition the following two questions. 1) Is there a pro race today 2) Any idea who is racing? All five people I talked to knew there was a pro race, but not a single one had any clue who was racing. I believe the ONLY reason they even knew there was a pro race is because the swim start sheet had them listed as the first wave.
If I am a race director, and have already made the decision to sink $50K into a prize purse, I am damn well going to make SURE that I get some value out of that. I would proudly post lists of starters, have links to their bios. And just like the big marathons or track meets, I would introduce the favorites out at swim start, and build it up. I would take the advertising line of "The best athletes in the world choose our events (and therefore you should too)". Why does Ironman pay the money for a prize purse, and not utilize these athletes to make the entire event more "meaningful"?
I was very disappointed in the way that IM 70.3 Texas handled their pro race. After being there, I feel that there was ZERO value in even having a pro race. It is baffling to me why WTC spends their own hard earned money to put up a pro purse, but doesn't leverage the pros, or even let the AG athlete know who the pros are, and how incredible their athletic feats are.
Thoughts?
Austin Hardy -
Personally, I knew there was a pro race. I knew this because I was seeking out a race with the requisite prize purse to qualify myself as elite (I failed, btw). The web site NEVER listed the pro field, facebook and twitter were mum on the pros too. During check in and bike check there was no mention of who the athletes were, what they were racing for, or any of that!! I was actively seeking a pro field list, and could not find it! I even posted on twitter, with no results.
On race morning I asked five athletes in transition the following two questions. 1) Is there a pro race today 2) Any idea who is racing? All five people I talked to knew there was a pro race, but not a single one had any clue who was racing. I believe the ONLY reason they even knew there was a pro race is because the swim start sheet had them listed as the first wave.
If I am a race director, and have already made the decision to sink $50K into a prize purse, I am damn well going to make SURE that I get some value out of that. I would proudly post lists of starters, have links to their bios. And just like the big marathons or track meets, I would introduce the favorites out at swim start, and build it up. I would take the advertising line of "The best athletes in the world choose our events (and therefore you should too)". Why does Ironman pay the money for a prize purse, and not utilize these athletes to make the entire event more "meaningful"?
I was very disappointed in the way that IM 70.3 Texas handled their pro race. After being there, I feel that there was ZERO value in even having a pro race. It is baffling to me why WTC spends their own hard earned money to put up a pro purse, but doesn't leverage the pros, or even let the AG athlete know who the pros are, and how incredible their athletic feats are.
Thoughts?
Austin Hardy -