Has anyone tested a single front ring with ERO, alphamantis, or in a tunnel? I know about the claim from cervelo, and acknowledge there a lot of other things that can vary from tester to tester ... But given the spike in interest over the last year, I hoped someone has given this a few runs in a test setting.
Triathlon Forum
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: Has anyone tested a 1x11 single front ring @ wind tunnel or alphamantis? [davetallo]
[ In reply to ]
Yes, tested at A2, removing the FD had no measurable difference at 0 yaw. But
Quote:
At -7.5°, no FD resulted in exactly 2 watts less. Bike only, NP3, 30MPh, A2 tunnel, April 1st 2015.
Re: Has anyone tested a 1x11 single front ring @ wind tunnel or alphamantis? [nickwhite]
[ In reply to ]
I'm surprised that there was no difference at 0deg yaw
I could understand no gain when the wind was coming from the non drive side, but from head on you are removing a pretty un-aero shape from the wind's path.
It just goes to show that the eyeball is a poor wind tunnel.
I could understand no gain when the wind was coming from the non drive side, but from head on you are removing a pretty un-aero shape from the wind's path.
It just goes to show that the eyeball is a poor wind tunnel.
Re: Has anyone tested a 1x11 single front ring @ wind tunnel or alphamantis? [davetallo]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Has anyone tested a 1x11 single front ring @ wind tunnel or alphamantis? [rockdude]
[ In reply to ]
That is a correct statement (that's what Cervelo said iirc) but the trick is that the downtube contributes less drag than you'd think to the whole system
Re: Has anyone tested a 1x11 single front ring @ wind tunnel or alphamantis? [davetallo]
[ In reply to ]
Hey Dave, I would say that the real advantage to a 1X system is that it's so much simpler and more convenient. Our team has been riding Sram 1X all year and love it. The fact that it is slightly lighter, and might be slightly faster, is icing on the cake! But yeah I'm sure Rapp would agree that convenience and functional simplicity are by far and the best aspects