Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss?
Quote | Reply
I have had a powertap for a while and then also got a set of Vectors (and a Wahoo Kickr...). However, I felt power numbers were off on the vectors so this am i did a comparison riding with the powertap and the vectors. Average power for a couple of minutes: vector 120 watts, pt 150 watts...

Started working on the vectors:
-- rechecked the torque so it is at 35 newton meters
-- did a static calibration
-- took out the batteries

All that seemed to help and the 2 powermeters were at 152 and 151 watts for the next short test. Now, I do not know if the powertap is measuring correctly but at least the difference was almost eliminated. I will try w the vectors on the kickr tonight and see if there is any difference.

Anything else I have missed in terms of calibrating the vectors?

Think crank length is set correctly but might need to reset angles? Also, I cannot figure out how to do the dynamic calibration where I am spposed to pedal backwards for some time. I do it but nothing seems to happen.

Thanks.

A
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
andreasjs wrote:
I have had a powertap for a while and then also got a set of Vectors (and a Wahoo Kickr...). However, I felt power numbers were off on the vectors so this am i did a comparison riding with the powertap and the vectors. Average power for a couple of minutes: vector 120 watts, pt 150 watts...

Started working on the vectors:
-- rechecked the torque so it is at 35 newton meters
-- did a static calibration
-- took out the batteries

All that seemed to help and the 2 powermeters were at 152 and 151 watts for the next short test. Now, I do not know if the powertap is measuring correctly but at least the difference was almost eliminated. I will try w the vectors on the kickr tonight and see if there is any difference.

Anything else I have missed in terms of calibrating the vectors?

Think crank length is set correctly but might need to reset angles? Also, I cannot figure out how to do the dynamic calibration where I am spposed to pedal backwards for some time. I do it but nothing seems to happen.

Thanks.

A

The dynamic calibration is simply pedaling backwards when up to speed, after about 5 rotations, the head unit will say power calibration successful. That's it, you can do it any time during the ride as well, but suggested as soon as you get enough speed to not fall over.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
andreasjs wrote:
Also, I cannot figure out how to do the dynamic calibration where I am spposed to pedal backwards for some time. I do it but nothing seems to happen.

Thanks.

A

https://forums.garmin.com/...-Dynamic-Calibration

You may find a few answers over on the Garmin Vector Forum.

Genetics load the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [huskertko] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thx

I never get that message though :(
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I just went through all this mess with my vectors. I couldn't get them to work until I realized a tiny piece of plastic residue from the stickers was stopping everything from working. Whenever you take out the batteries, you have to reset the angles (aka pedal up to 80rpms or whatever the range is). Then do another static calibration with pedals in the 3 & 9 o'clock positions (without being clipped in). Once your all calibrated, your good to go. You shouldn't have to reset the angles again unless you take the batteries out. You already rechecked the torque so you should be good there. The dynamic calibration is fairly simple, just randomly back pedal when you're out riding for 5-8rpms. I'm still using my 310xt at the moment, which doesn't tell me if the dynamic calibration was successful or not. If you have better head unit (510, 810, & I think the 910 works at well?) it should tell you if that calibration was successful.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Torqued to 25 Newton Meters...not 35. DC Rainmaker suggests this is the most critical installation step in order to get accurate watt readings.

"Wait.....and Hope" -Edmond Dantes
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [BambooKing] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
BambooKing wrote:
Torqued to 25 Newton Meters...not 35. DC Rainmaker suggests this is the most critical installation step in order to get accurate watt readings.

Bamboo King,

You're confusing Newton meters with foot pounds. DC says 25 foot pounds which is pretty darn close to 35 Newton meters.

Genetics load the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
andreasjs wrote:


All that seemed to help and the 2 powermeters were at 152 and 151 watts for the next short test. Now, I do not know if the powertap is measuring correctly but at least the difference was almost eliminated. I will try w the vectors on the kickr tonight and see if there is any difference.

Anything else I have missed in terms of calibrating the vectors?

Think crank length is set correctly but might need to reset angles? Also, I cannot figure out how to do the dynamic calibration where I am spposed to pedal backwards for some time. I do it but nothing seems to happen.

Thanks.

A

The power meters will never read exactly the same. If anything the vector should be slightly higher because with the powertap you get some drive train loss.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [b.will] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [b.will] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Damn powermeters, both of them measuring too low :-)
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
andreasjs wrote:
I have had a powertap for a while and then also got a set of Vectors (and a Wahoo Kickr...). However, I felt power numbers were off on the vectors so this am i did a comparison riding with the powertap and the vectors. Average power for a couple of minutes: vector 120 watts, pt 150 watts...

Started working on the vectors:
-- rechecked the torque so it is at 35 newton meters
-- did a static calibration
-- took out the batteries

All that seemed to help and the 2 powermeters were at 152 and 151 watts for the next short test. Now, I do not know if the powertap is measuring correctly but at least the difference was almost eliminated. I will try w the vectors on the kickr tonight and see if there is any difference.

Anything else I have missed in terms of calibrating the vectors?

Think crank length is set correctly but might need to reset angles? Also, I cannot figure out how to do the dynamic calibration where I am spposed to pedal backwards for some time. I do it but nothing seems to happen.

Thanks.

A


For the dynamic calibration, pedal backwards approximately 10-20 times. It should notify you when calibration is complete.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [davee] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Per Garmin, the ability to do a dynamic calibration (pedaling backwards) has been removed. I guess now you just do the static calibration and that should do for the whole ride? I liked the ability to re-calibrate while on the ride, always nice to confirm the numbers you are seeing. I don't know why they would have removed that option.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [mfisch69] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mfisch69 wrote:
Per Garmin, the ability to do a dynamic calibration (pedaling backwards) has been removed. I guess now you just do the static calibration and that should do for the whole ride? I liked the ability to re-calibrate while on the ride, always nice to confirm the numbers you are seeing. I don't know why they would have removed that option.

Correct.

The only thing I see missing from the list is that I'd recommend doing a short 2-4 sprints (just 10-20sec is fine), just to settle in. Then pop batteries and re-calibrate. To be clear, this is roughly in line with what you'd do with a Quarq as well (just a bit more settle time). Fwiw, I do these sprints on a trainer, since it's easier to just do all the calibration there in one shot.


-
My tiny little slice of the internets: dcrainmaker.com
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You are missing nothing. The Vector pedal power meter system is the most frustrating piece of garbage I have ever owned. I have been trying to get mine working for a year with no luck. Garmin support wants me to keep repeating the same steps over and over. I am so turned off that I want to junk all the Garmin equipment I own and start over with ANYTHING else. I'm sorry, but you wasted your money.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [mfisch69] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mfisch69 wrote:
Per Garmin, the ability to do a dynamic calibration (pedaling backwards) has been removed. I guess now you just do the static calibration and that should do for the whole ride? I liked the ability to re-calibrate while on the ride, always nice to confirm the numbers you are seeing. I don't know why they would have removed that option.

Possibly because pedaling backwards exerts a small reverse-torque, not zero torque. This has the potential to cause errors (as, e.g., occur when you set the zero offset of a Quarq by back-pedaling against a stickier/stiffer-than-assumed freehub).
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [atgnat] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
And, I've had a pair of pedals for over a year and have had absolutely no issues. Funny.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [James Haycraft] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
James Haycraft wrote:
And, I've had a pair of pedals for over a year and have had absolutely no issues. Funny.

Ditto (well, there was one occasion when the left pedal seemed to refuse to 'wake up' and pair w/ the 810...don't know if it was the cold, rain, the fact that I was around a dozen other powermeter-using cyclists, or user-error on my part).

I will admit, though, that I haven't swapped the pedals around that much...maybe half-a-dozen times in total?
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
andreasjs wrote:
Damn powermeters, both of them measuring too low :-)

Reminds me of a refridgerator magnet I saw recently:

"According to this BMI chart...

<picture of grumpy fat cat>

...I'm too short."
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [andreasjs] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There is no more dynamic calibration available nor needed with SW update. Pedaling backwards no longer calibrates the Vector. You can stop doing it. If you go over to Garmin forum, you will instantly find all the answers.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [dcrainmaker] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dcrainmaker wrote:
mfisch69 wrote:
Per Garmin, the ability to do a dynamic calibration (pedaling backwards) has been removed. I guess now you just do the static calibration and that should do for the whole ride? I liked the ability to re-calibrate while on the ride, always nice to confirm the numbers you are seeing. I don't know why they would have removed that option.


Correct.

The only thing I see missing from the list is that I'd recommend doing a short 2-4 sprints (just 10-20sec is fine), just to settle in. Then pop batteries and re-calibrate. To be clear, this is roughly in line with what you'd do with a Quarq as well (just a bit more settle time). Fwiw, I do these sprints on a trainer, since it's easier to just do all the calibration there in one shot.

I don't have these pedals, but have a friend asking me about calibrating them (v1 garmin vector pedals) since he feels they're reading especially low since the bike swap. He's taken them off one bike and put them on another bike. I see later in this thread that pedaling backwards is no longer required...? Steps for calibrating?

Need to use a torque wrench when installing? torque value?

Related question: on paper, if the bikes have different cranks of the same length but the cranks flex at differing rates, this shouldn't affect the pedals power reading. But in reality, does it?

wovebike.com | Wove on instagram
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [milesthedog] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
milesthedog wrote:
I don't have these pedals, but have a friend asking me about calibrating them (v1 garmin vector pedals) since he feels they're reading especially low since the bike swap. He's taken them off one bike and put them on another bike. I see later in this thread that pedaling backwards is no longer required...? Steps for calibrating?

Need to use a torque wrench when installing? torque value?

Related question: on paper, if the bikes have different cranks of the same length but the cranks flex at differing rates, this shouldn't affect the pedals power reading. But in reality, does it?

Yes, pedaling backwards is no longer required.

After the initial install, your head unit will ask you to spin at around 80 to 90 cadence for it to set the angles. Once that is done, you have to manually enter the crank length. That's it. After that, before each ride, put your pedals horizontal to the ground and once the powermeter has paired, pull down from top and tap Calibrate. Wait until some number close to zero shows up on the screen and you are done.

Yes you need a torque wrench. Torque it to around 40 N/m.

Vectors read power at the pedal. Whatever flex you have in your cranks affects the power transferred past that point.
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [mkserge] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thank you, will pass on to the friend.

So say the pedal is attached to a wet noodle and the rider's PE is high as they are trying to put out high power, but the noodle for a crank arm is just preventing the rider from producing as high torque as they were able to produce with a stiff crank arm. Power would read low while PE is high.... ?? If the garmin is measuring flex in the spindle, that's a minuscule amount of flex to measure, so at what point is a minuscule amount of crank flex equivalent to the visually obvious flex of the wet noodle for the purpose of the PE vs power production question?

wovebike.com | Wove on instagram
Last edited by: milesthedog: Jul 20, 17 12:36
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [milesthedog] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
milesthedog wrote:
Thank you, will pass on to the friend.

So say the pedal is attached to a wet noodle and the rider's PE is high as they are trying to put out high power, but the noodle for a crank arm is just preventing the rider from producing as high torque as they were able to produce with a stiff crank arm. Power would read low while PE is high.... ??

What's PE?
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [mkserge] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
perceived exertion

the engineers are about to take a sh!t on my wet noodle question

wovebike.com | Wove on instagram
Quote Reply
Re: Garmin Vector Calibration - what did I miss? [milesthedog] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If power is low then perceived exertion is low.

Bottom line is, you will lose some of the work you do on the bending energy of your "wet noodles" instead of using that energy to propel yourself forward. Your power meter will still read the power you are exerting because it is reading it at the pedals, before some of the work is expended on bending the cranks. If you measured the power at the hub, and at the pedals, then you would see a discrepancy proportional to the wetness of your noodles (this is a simplified model).
Quote Reply

Prev Next