Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Different Shoes For Different Uses? - Who Knew?
Quote | Reply
We seem to be in deep recycling mode these days.

What else to think after seeing articles like this - http://triathlete-europe.competitor.com/...utm_medium=whats-hot

Different shoes for different uses? Who knew?

For those of us who've been around for a few years, this is nothing new. In fact, I had to laugh when the whole "minimalist" shoe thing started to take off - weren't these just the same as the road racing flats and spiked track shoes that we ran in over 30 years ago?

Back then we had 4 - 5 different shoes - our regular trainers. Perhaps a lighter weight trainer for tempo runs and longer road races. An ultra-light racing flat for shorter road races and cross-country courses, you could not use spikes on. An then our track spikes for racing on the track and for full-on grass xc running.

Even the currently popular thick soled Hoka's, while fundamentally different, were likely sprung in an idea from the Nike LD-1000's from the late 70's - an ultra thick( for the time) soled trainer for the high mileage runner!


Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Different Shoes For Different Uses? - Who Knew? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It is interesting. There's a clear dichotomy between some styles like minimalist vs. Hoka's or most trail running shoes from ~5 years ago that were built up for protection vs. the trail "glove" type shoes. It's hard to tell if the market is driving this or the companies are.


Dtyrrell
Quote Reply