Thomas Gerlach wrote:
Dan Funk wrote:
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
Saundo wrote:
Raced Mt. Tremblant last year and loved it, well marshalled and no draft packs and pretty good swim conditions.
For next year, which is better? And how fast does each sell-out?
I prefer Louisville. It is really a great race, very under-rated IMO.
A bit tangential... but how would Nooga run match up to Madison?
Taking my bias out of the hometown race, I have to say that Madison is a fantastic race, venue, and town. The crowd support on State Street is the most impressive I have seen at any race and you can't beat the backdrop of the Nation's second largest capital building. The run course is quite difficult IMO.
Louisville was difficult because of the heat when the race was in August. Now I have to imagine it is one of the easier courses out there in October. Chatt didn't seem to have quite the support of Madison. I prefer the Louisville finish line to the Chatt, but it doesn't beat MOO.
Thanks...sorry, wasn't quite clear in my question. I've raced MOO twice and love the course.
From reading this thread, sounds like Nooga's run course is "tough" - which is fine with me. Don't have a lot to personally compare with as I've only raced two other Ironman-distance races: Copenhagen (run is... not tough). And Norseman (run is...well...ridiculous).
I've always felt Madison's run course is tough, but doable (ran a 3:36 and 3:50 something in my two times there).
So interested in how you would compare difficulty level of Nooga and MOO runs. Thanks!